Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 18195
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am
Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver
can't
cent
cint
cont
cunt
It doesn't take a genius to figure out which word the program edits out, since it leaves all the others.
cent
cint
cont
cunt
It doesn't take a genius to figure out which word the program edits out, since it leaves all the others.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 13037
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm
Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver
Why does Will refuse to tell us what it was Harmony edited out?
Like we don't already know.
Like we don't already know.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:12 pm
Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver
harmony wrote:can't
cent
cint
cont
c***
It doesn't take a genius to figure out which word the program edits out, since it leaves all the others.
LOL!
It doesn't take a genius to figure out that your fabricated little story is unraveling.
Like any kid caught in a lie of complete manufacture (as opposed to a lie of minor embellishment), you've invested so much of your credibility in this tale that you're going to have to see it through to the bitter end, for better or worse.
I confess I'm looking forward to your continued public discomfiture.
We'll explore how this all reflects on "MsJack" in a subsequent post ...
I thought myself the wiser to have viewed the evidence left of such a great demise. I followed every step. But the only thing I ever learned before the journey's end was there was nothing there to learn, only something to forget.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:12 pm
Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver
Kevin Graham wrote:Why does Will refuse to tell us what it was Harmony edited out?
He doesn't.
He has done so.
Twice already.
viewtopic.php?p=449642#p449642
viewtopic.php?p=449684#p449684
I thought myself the wiser to have viewed the evidence left of such a great demise. I followed every step. But the only thing I ever learned before the journey's end was there was nothing there to learn, only something to forget.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 12064
- Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm
Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver
Will Schryver wrote:Eric wrote:Isn't the C-word already censored on this board when you type it out? So harmony supposedly edited a 'C' followed by three asterisks from Will's post and then threatened to suspend him for it? That seems a little strange to me...
Notwithstanding our differences on most things, Eric once again provides evidence for why I respect him more than just about any other man who posts on this message board. He will not be beholden to any kind of "group think" behavior. Maybe his resistance to that kind of thing arises out of his Boys Ranch experience. Maybe it's just part of who he is. But you have to tip your hat to a man who is willing to stand up and highlight the obvious, even as the prevailing mob atmosphere suppresses such impulses in everyone else around him. Here's a man who doesn't pause to count the cost before he stands to speak the truth as he sees it. That, in my book, is a man worthy of attention, and a man most likely destined to make his mark in life, while the spineless crowd from which he rises cowers in the smoldering shame of their own mediocrity.
At any rate, your trenchant observation had previously eluded me, but is 100% correct. Had I, in reality, used the "C" word in a sentence, the board software would have censored it, leaving a "c" followed by three asterisks--meaning, of course, that no one ever saw the "C" word in a post I made. This entire charade has been an exercise in the principle that:... it is no sin to lie that they may catch a man in a lie, that they may destroy him.
Anyway, in my absence from the board, I see several new pages have been produced. I can't hope to read it all, but I'll scan through the posts of Blair "More Holier Than Thou" Hodges*, MsJack, and perhaps even Doctor Scratch. I'm sure I can come up with a little something to say in their behalf.
* = Not a phrase of my own invention; I've merely adopted it. It has only temporarily replaced "Blair 'The Future of Mopologetics' Hodges" in popularity. You know, upon reflection, it occurs to me that it's far better to be mocked in public and respected in private than respected in public and mocked in private. But I'm kind of funny that way ...
Even without the C-word, we have you on record sexually harassing women. You've lost the war, but you're still trying to take this little hill.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver
harmony wrote:can't
cent
cint
cont
c***
It doesn't take a genius to figure out which word the program edits out, since it leaves all the others.
What if Will typed in the asterisks himself?
Edit: Will, you're a d***!
(that's dork, of course)
Last edited by _Simon Belmont on Tue May 03, 2011 2:07 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 12064
- Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm
Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver
Will Schryver wrote:Kevin Graham wrote:Why does Will refuse to tell us what it was Harmony edited out?
He doesn't.
He has done so.
Twice already.
viewtopic.php?p=449642#p449642
viewtopic.php?p=449684#p449684
Two conflicting stories. Which of them is true?
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:28 am
Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver
Will Schryver wrote:harmony wrote:can't
cent
cint
cont
c***
It doesn't take a genius to figure out which word the program edits out, since it leaves all the others.
LOL!
It doesn't take a genius to figure out that your fabricated little story is unraveling.
Like any kid caught in a lie of complete manufacture (as opposed to a lie of minor embellishment), you've invested so much of your credibility in this tale that you're going to have to see it through to the bitter end, for better or worse.
I confess I'm looking forward to your continued public discomfiture.
We'll explore how this all reflects on "MsJack" in a subsequent post ...
So is it now your claim that you actually typed c*** but intended some other word?
Yes, there is some definite unraveling going on here. On that I agree.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 13037
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm
Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver
So according to Will, instead of using the C-word, what he actually said to Harmony was that she was "A despicable hypocrite and a shame to the Saints."
Seriously?
We're supposed to believe this rather innocuous statement (by comparison to his other stuff) resulted in the numerous knee-jerk responses?
We're supposed to believe this rather innocuous statement (by comparison to his other stuff) prompted Harmony to immediately edit it out?
We're supposed to believe that Will actually remembers what he wrote back then, especially when every time we bring up an earlier citation he informs us that he totally forgot saying it? This is the same guy who just recently swore up and down that he never called Emma Smith a bitch. I mean that isn't quite something you forget, but Will denied saying it. Then he was forced to admit saying it after a link was provided. So he forgets one word profanities, but remembers a nine word phrase to the letter!?
As I have said before, Will is going to lie if he thinks he can get away with it. He does this every time. But just because the citation was removed, doesn't mean there is no smoking gun. All the evidence suggests rather strongly that he said something that was more disgusting than heis other comments, and "despicable hypocrite and a shame to the Saints" just make any sense. Harmony wouldn;t have edited that out, and I and the other folks certainly wouldn't have responded the way we did.
Seriously?
We're supposed to believe this rather innocuous statement (by comparison to his other stuff) resulted in the numerous knee-jerk responses?
We're supposed to believe this rather innocuous statement (by comparison to his other stuff) prompted Harmony to immediately edit it out?
We're supposed to believe that Will actually remembers what he wrote back then, especially when every time we bring up an earlier citation he informs us that he totally forgot saying it? This is the same guy who just recently swore up and down that he never called Emma Smith a bitch. I mean that isn't quite something you forget, but Will denied saying it. Then he was forced to admit saying it after a link was provided. So he forgets one word profanities, but remembers a nine word phrase to the letter!?
As I have said before, Will is going to lie if he thinks he can get away with it. He does this every time. But just because the citation was removed, doesn't mean there is no smoking gun. All the evidence suggests rather strongly that he said something that was more disgusting than heis other comments, and "despicable hypocrite and a shame to the Saints" just make any sense. Harmony wouldn;t have edited that out, and I and the other folks certainly wouldn't have responded the way we did.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:12 pm
Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver
Simon Belmont wrote:What if Will typed in the asterisks himself?
Will did nothing of the sort.
Will never even said anything remotely related to the allegations being leveled against him.
Will never even contemplated saying anything remotely related to the allegations being leveled against him.
As I have made perfectly clear several times in this thread:
I have never in my life used the "C" word, in public or private. I consider it one of the very few "taboo" words in the English language. I am offended by anyone who would use it, and would forcefully upbraid anyone using the word in my presence.
viewtopic.php?p=449929#p449929
harmony is lying through her teeth--and she knows it.
MsJack is complicit in this lie.
MrStakO'IntellectLite is a suborned witness.
Scurvy Ten Sing is a suborned witness.
Still waiting to hear (with ever decreasing expectation of it ever happening) from Rollo Tomasi and DarthJ, who were the most involved critics in the Hofmann thread in question, and who posted both immediately before and after the alleged incident. When and if they emerge from the shadows, will they or will they not join the suborned witness club? Or will they merely remain silent, for fear of offending the tribe?
I thought myself the wiser to have viewed the evidence left of such a great demise. I followed every step. But the only thing I ever learned before the journey's end was there was nothing there to learn, only something to forget.