Terrestrial comments from Will Schryver thread

[_Buffalo]

Quoting Will's sexually harassing statements and disapproving of them is the same as personally attacking him. Good to know.

I am pleased to see that I could help you get past your nuance challenge on this matter. If it helps, remember that MsJack devoted an entire thread where she and a horde of other MD participants have piled on what you delicately refer to as disapproval (a lame play at semantic games).

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

No, a lame semantic game would be acting like Will was the victim of a public stoning/witch hunt/crucifixion, when it is in fact Will who is a victimizer (of women).

Defending a sexual harasser by pretending that strong disapproval of sexual harassment is as bad or worse than sexual harassment is beyond lame, you little lap dog you.

[_wenglund]

The time for me to be concerned with Schryver's Book of Abraham research will be when it is published.

There you go interjecting a bit of sense into the discussion. What's wrong with you?

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

[_wenglund]

No, a lame semantic game would be acting like Will was the victim of a public stoning/witch hunt/crucifixion, when it is in fact Will who is a victimizer (of women).

Okay, so metaphors ar lost on you. At least you have something besides nuance challeges to work on.

Defending a sexual harasser by pretending that strong disapproval of sexual harassment is as bad or worse than sexual harassment is beyond lame, you little lap dog you.

I understand that in your muddled state of mind there is the tendency to conflate two very distinct things: 1) my humorous condemnations of mobocracy and the wild abandonment of basic principles of jurisprudence, and 2) defense of the accused (which I have yet to do).

But, with my help, and your willing participation, I believe we will eventually straighten out your profound confusion.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

[_The Reaping]

No, labelling will as a misogynist would be personally attacking him. Something the entire thread did from the beginning.

I believe that MsJack labeled some of Will's words and behavior as misogynist, not Will himself. That Will's words/behavior were misogynist is beyond question.

Lmao. Assuming that even made sense, read the title of the thread.

[_Buffalo]

) my humorous

ERROR: humor not found

[_Buffalo]

Lmao. Assuming that even made sense, read the title of the thread.

Yes, I read it. Will is not called a misogynist in it. But the fact of the matter is that Will IS a misogynist, and his own words confirm that. It's not a personal attack to even state it blatantly, any more than it's a personal attack to say Willy Nelson is a drug user. These are ordinary facts.

[_The Reaping]

Lmao. Assuming that even made sense, read the title of the thread.

Yes, I read it. Will is not called a misogynist in it. But the fact of the matter is that Will IS a misogynist, and his own words confirm that. It's not a personal attack to even state it blatantly, any more than it's a personal attack to say Willy Nelson is a drug user. These are ordinary facts.

You seem to have some strange notion that if something is true it isn't an attack? Why do you think that?

[_wenglund]

) my humorous

ERROR: humor not found

Okay, I'll add your lack of a sense of humor to the other puliferating challenges I hope to help you overcome. Don't be discouraged. It can all be made right in time.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

[_wenglund]

You seem to have some strange notion that if something is true it isn't an attack? Why do you think that?

Please be patient with Buffalo. He is suffering from an enormous cognative deficite, and is doing his best, with my assistance, to unravel the knot of confusion that is his current state of mind. He is not ready, as yet, to rationally answer the insightful question you asked. So, don't be surprised if he comes up with something quite inane, if not deflective, in response.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

[_schreech]

He is suffering from an enormous cognative deficite, and is doing his best, with my assistance, to unravel the knot of confusion that is his current state of mind...

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

LoL - watch out buffalo, wade is trying to "unravel" your (balloon) knot...