Terrestrial comments from Will Schryver thread

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Droopy
_Emeritus
Posts: 9826
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:06 pm

Re: Terrestrial comments from Will Schryver thread

Post by _Droopy »

Trevor wrote:
Droopy wrote:This assertion does not appear to have been impregnated with a substantial degree of veracity Trevor. And while your at work impregnating your comments with a bit more veracity, I'll stick with the kind of writing that brought me a 3.8 grade point average at university and which expresses the kind of intellectual creativity and exploritoriness with the language I enjoy.

All writing, in other words, that is correct from a English teachers point of view, is not necessarily the best, from an intellectually stimulative point of view.


I have read your latest post and stand by my statement.


How can you "stand by" a "statement" Trevor?

Even in the Shaolin Temple, this would be considered a tall order, no matter how intense the training.
Nothing is going to startle us more when we pass through the veil to the other side than to realize how well we know our Father [in Heaven] and how familiar his face is to us

- President Ezra Taft Benson


I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.

- Thomas Sowell
_MrStakhanovite
_Emeritus
Posts: 5269
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:32 am

Re: Terrestrial comments from Will Schryver thread

Post by _MrStakhanovite »

That'll teach you to mess with a 3.8 GPA Trevor.
_Runtu
_Emeritus
Posts: 16721
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 5:06 am

Re: Terrestrial comments from Will Schryver thread

Post by _Runtu »

MrStakhanovite wrote:That'll teach you to mess with a 3.8 GPA Trevor.


Just think what his GPA might have been had he learned a little discipline and judgment in his writing. It might have approached mine. ;-)
Runtu's Rincón

If you just talk, I find that your mouth comes out with stuff. -- Karl Pilkington
_Droopy
_Emeritus
Posts: 9826
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:06 pm

Re: Terrestrial comments from Will Schryver thread

Post by _Droopy »

I've been bested yet again!


Its just the lack of veracity I place in your statements Stak. Nothing more.
Nothing is going to startle us more when we pass through the veil to the other side than to realize how well we know our Father [in Heaven] and how familiar his face is to us

- President Ezra Taft Benson


I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.

- Thomas Sowell
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: Terrestrial comments from Will Schryver thread

Post by _Chap »

Trevor wrote:Droopy, no one with any taste or talent for writing would say that you write better than Runtu. No one.


Droopy wrote:This assertion does not appear to have been impregnated with a substantial degree of veracity Trevor. And while your at work impregnating your comments with a bit more veracity, I'll stick with the kind of writing that brought me a 3.8 grade point average at university and which expresses the kind of intellectual creativity and exploritoriness with the language I enjoy.


Hi Carolyn! It was the otherwise unattested "exploritoriness" that enabled me to dig up your other cyber-identity!

I really like your diary, and admire the way you make up cool new words.
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_Droopy
_Emeritus
Posts: 9826
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:06 pm

Re: Terrestrial comments from Will Schryver thread

Post by _Droopy »

It doesn't really surprise me, Droopy, to learn that your "literary and intellectual pedigree" is based on your childhood reading of Science Fiction and Fantasy. Somethings never change, eh? Did you get your politics from Ayn Rand and Robert Heinlein?


I didn't come upon Rand until my mid-20s, and though she had a most definite value in certain areas, I never "got my politics" from her ideas. Most of my ideas, in early form, were received from Buckley, Firing Line, and exposure, intermittently to other seminal conservative intellectuals. My primary influence, however, was always the Church and the leaders who spoke most eloquently and deeply of its principles.

My full intellectual explorations blossomed in the mid-eighties, when my philosophical and political identity matured and I began a lifelong intellectual journey into philosophy, political philosophy, history, political economy, and related subjects.

What do you find wrong with science fiction and heroic fantasy?
Nothing is going to startle us more when we pass through the veil to the other side than to realize how well we know our Father [in Heaven] and how familiar his face is to us

- President Ezra Taft Benson


I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.

- Thomas Sowell
_Droopy
_Emeritus
Posts: 9826
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:06 pm

Re: Terrestrial comments from Will Schryver thread

Post by _Droopy »

Chap wrote:
Trevor wrote:Droopy, no one with any taste or talent for writing would say that you write better than Runtu. No one.


Droopy wrote:This assertion does not appear to have been impregnated with a substantial degree of veracity Trevor. And while your at work impregnating your comments with a bit more veracity, I'll stick with the kind of writing that brought me a 3.8 grade point average at university and which expresses the kind of intellectual creativity and exploritoriness with the language I enjoy.


Hi Carolyn! It was the otherwise unattested "exploritoriness" that enabled me to dig up your other cyber-identity!

I really like your diary, and admire the way you make up cool new words.



Huh?
Nothing is going to startle us more when we pass through the veil to the other side than to realize how well we know our Father [in Heaven] and how familiar his face is to us

- President Ezra Taft Benson


I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.

- Thomas Sowell
_MrStakhanovite
_Emeritus
Posts: 5269
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:32 am

Re: Terrestrial comments from Will Schryver thread

Post by _MrStakhanovite »

Droopy wrote:What do you find wrong with science fiction and heroic fantasy?


It’s amusing, given you have a serious case of unwarranted self importance.
_Trevor
_Emeritus
Posts: 7213
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: Terrestrial comments from Will Schryver thread

Post by _Trevor »

Eric wrote:I don't have time to go through and find my absolute favorites, but here is a recent post I truly enjoyed reading:

Droopy wrote:Eric is a thoroughgoing and unfazed retro-fellow traveler and useful idiot of the kind one might think had been shown the quickest route to the La Brea Tar Pits after the Berlin Wall came tumbling down in 1989.


That's good stuff right there.


OK, yes, that is good stuff. Droopy does have his moments. He truly excels at insults. I can't fault you for appreciating writing like this.
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: Terrestrial comments from Will Schryver thread

Post by _EAllusion »

Droopy wrote:Its odd, because the post BA level French philosophy class I took in 2008 required a great deal of writing, including a fairly large thesis paper for the final, which my philosophic teacher - a committed radical leftist and scholar of postmodern thought - saw fit to give As to at every possible opportunity.


Yeah, I don't care, but postmodern writing is notorious for being unnecessarily dense. So at least this made me chuckle.

You tend to use what appears to sound to you like sophisticated vocabulary poorly. You often use a lot of redundant words and phrases. Years ago you would misuse jargon and more complicated vocabulary so consistently that it was more sad than annoying. To your credit, you have improved this significantly. But you still err enough that it doesn't come across well. You also often will opt for the "fancy" word over a more plain one when the plain one would communicate your idea more clearly.

You frequently try to shoehorn in intellectual sounding references when they are awkward or irrelevant.

On top of that, most of your posts are far more bluster than they are content. You have a habit of being frequently wrong - really wrong - and tend to project your faults and the faults of those you support onto objects of criticism.

All this together makes you look like someone desperately trying to sound learned when you aren't. There are very good writers here. Look at how they write.

Others have also mentioned to me over time, regarding my talks (given in Church), things said in conversation (since I was very young, I might add), and writing, here and in other venues, that they appreciate the intellectual scope, philosophical depth, sophistication, and creativity of my thought and articulation of those thoughts...

...what you think of my thoughts or writing is, as one might conclude at first glance, little more than an artifact of your own intellectual temperament and internal psychological dynamics.


Case in point. I realize so nakedly criticizing you this way, especially when what I'm saying is true, is a rough thing for me to do. I wouldn't feel comfortable with it if not for your tendency to be a condescending jerk. I have no desire to get into a pissing match with you about our relative brain power.

PC! blah blah
[/quote]Will has a pattern of misogynist behavior. I think the case for that has been laid out in detail and I feel no need to repeat it.
Last edited by Guest on Thu May 05, 2011 12:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply