MsJack wrote:I regard much of the behavior that I documented in the OP as just as serious, if not more serious than that one example, so I'm curious as to why you are less interested in that.
The c-word is much more vulgar and derogatory, in my opinion, than the b-word or other slurs. Do you disagree? It would surprise me if an active Mormon posting under his own name would use such a nasty word. Even Will.
I'm curious, too, about your use of another c-word: cad. I wonder why you would call someone that for doubting the truth claims of the incident in question. I'm offended by the implication that I don't treat women properly because I expressed my doubts. I'm sure my girlfriend would disagree. Is that what you were trying to imply, or am I reading you wrong?
Of course, there's no rule that says you have to address William's transgressions in order of seriousness; you're allowed to be as arbitrary as you like and you don't owe anyone any explanation. My question was just me being curious.
I don't feel like I need to address and condemn everything else that Will has done. I'm sure he doesn't count me as a friend, or a fan, or a supporter. Please don't mistake my comments about the c-word incident as anything other than me speaking my mind about the c-word incident.
You haven't demonstrated this, but please feel free to keep saying it. This is, after all, a free speech forum.
Rollo, the time stamps, and the conflicting testimonies.