harmony wrote:I am not hostile towards the church.
Yes you are.
How do apologists explain the 1835 editon of the D&C 101:4?
-
_The Nehor
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 11832
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am
Re: How do apologists explain the 1835 editon of the D&C 101:4?
Yes you are.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
-
_The Nehor
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 11832
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am
Re: How do apologists explain the 1835 editon of the D&C 101:4?
Polygamy-Porter wrote:Am I hostile toward your church?
Yes.
No.
lol
I just call b***s*** when I see it.
Do you yell at the mirror a lot then?
The Mormon missionaries seem to have me blacklisted as I see them actually skip my home on the rare occasion I see them tracting in my 'hood
I know I would blacklist you.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
-
_beefcalf
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1232
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 6:40 pm
Re: How do apologists explain the 1835 editon of the D&C 101:4?
Simon Belmont wrote:You're really asking this question, here, where almost everyone is hostile toward the Church?
I ASK YOU, SIMON BELMONT:
"Were all of the polygamists breaking their own rules as per D&C 101:4 until 1876 when it was removed from the canon?"
eschew obfuscation
"I'll let you believers in on a little secret: not only is the LDS church not really true, it's obviously not true." -Sethbag
"I'll let you believers in on a little secret: not only is the LDS church not really true, it's obviously not true." -Sethbag
-
_thews
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 3053
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 2:26 pm
Re: How do apologists explain the 1835 editon of the D&C 101:4?
Simon Belmont wrote:You're really asking this question, here, where almost everyone is hostile toward the Church?
Answering questions with questions is a common Mormon tactic to divert. In this case, Simon is attempting to negate the question asked by implying bias. The diversion is necessary, because he has no rational answer.
2 Tim 4:3 For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine.
2 Tim 4:4 They will turn their ears away from the truth & turn aside to myths
2 Tim 4:4 They will turn their ears away from the truth & turn aside to myths
-
_Doctor CamNC4Me
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 21663
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am
Re: How do apologists explain the 1835 editon of the D&C 101:4?
Hello,
Mr. Simon never has an answer. C'est pourquoi il est ignoré.
V/R
Dr. Cam
Mr. Simon never has an answer. C'est pourquoi il est ignoré.
V/R
Dr. Cam
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.
Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
-
_Doctor CamNC4Me
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 21663
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am
Re: How do apologists explain the 1835 editon of the D&C 101:4?
Hello,
Mr. Simon never has an answer. C'est pourquoi il est ignoré.
V/R
Dr. Cam
Mr. Simon never has an answer. C'est pourquoi il est ignoré.
V/R
Dr. Cam
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.
Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
-
_Joseph
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 3517
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 11:00 pm
Re: How do apologists explain the 1835 editon of the D&C 101:4?
kneewhore, Harmony is one LDS member who actually seems to care about the truth. Why she is still in is a mystery but she has her reasons.
It is lds-inc members like you and the slimeboy and bs that make so many of us glad we don't live near you.
Harmony is more a Christian person and not an automaton and shrill fanatic like you guys are.
It is lds-inc members like you and the slimeboy and bs that make so many of us glad we don't live near you.
Harmony is more a Christian person and not an automaton and shrill fanatic like you guys are.
"This is how INGORNAT these fools are!" - darricktevenson
Bow your head and mutter, what in hell am I doing here?
infaymos wrote: "Peterson is the defacto king ping of the Mormon Apologetic world."
Bow your head and mutter, what in hell am I doing here?
infaymos wrote: "Peterson is the defacto king ping of the Mormon Apologetic world."
-
_Joey
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 717
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 1:34 am
Re: How do apologists explain the 1835 editon of the D&C 101:4?
Simon Belmont wrote:Joseph wrote:Lies, damn lies and LDS 'revelations'.
You have outstanding questions in the threads you actually start. Why don't you answer them?
http://www.mormondiscussions.com/phpBB3 ... =1&t=18172
Nice Millett!
"It's not so much that FARMS scholarship in the area Book of Mormon historicity is "rejected' by the secular academic community as it is they are "ignored". [Daniel Peterson, May, 2004]
-
_Simon Belmont
Re: How do apologists explain the 1835 editon of the D&C 101:4?
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:Hello,
Mr. Simon never has an answer. C'est pourquoi il est ignoré.
V/R
Dr. Cam
Actually, I'm ignored because you don't like what I have to say. You shun the truth, because it doesn't fit your hateful paradigm.
And don't try to pretend you speak French.
-
_The Nehor
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 11832
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am
Re: How do apologists explain the 1835 editon of the D&C 101:4?
Joseph wrote:kneewhore, Harmony is one LDS member who actually seems to care about the truth.
I don't think so.
Why she is still in is a mystery but she has her reasons.
I'm as befuddled by this as you are.
It is lds-inc members like you and the slimeboy and bs that make so many of us glad we don't live near you.
The feeling is mutual.
Harmony is more a Christian person and not an automaton and shrill fanatic like you guys are.
You know this how exactly? Because she attacks the leaders of the Church? lol
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo