Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by **_moksha** » Wed May 11, 2011 5:35 am

asbestosman wrote:
moksha wrote:How about a thread on which apologist has the best butt?

Wade has my vote.

What methodology does Wade employ when it comes to butts? Does he do sweet and tangy or fully smoked?

Post by **_Polygamy-Porter** » Wed May 11, 2011 5:36 am

May I ask what is the selection criteria?

None of them present arguments against the truth, so that one is out.

It is very hard thing to do; hiding the truth.

I think a better poll might be "Which defenders on MDB have the most bizzare defenses?"

Post by **_Themis** » Wed May 11, 2011 2:31 pm

The Nehor wrote:
I'm glad you believe that. After mentioning it I worried you and others might try to find it and pollute it for a while. I'm sure Scratch will run a few google searches but that should be it and the fun place will stay fun.

Why would I waste my time looking for something that does not exist as described by you?

Post by **_The Nehor** » Wed May 11, 2011 2:33 pm

Themis wrote:
The Nehor wrote:
I'm glad you believe that. After mentioning it I worried you and others might try to find it and pollute it for a while. I'm sure Scratch will run a few google searches but that should be it and the fun place will stay fun.

Why would I waste my time looking for something that does not exist as described by you?

You wouldn't so go ahead and don't. Everyone is a winner that way....especially me.

Post by **_Themis** » Wed May 11, 2011 2:39 pm

The Nehor wrote:
There is no 'blame'.

Of course there is. You specifically say it was others postings that made you change your own. That is blaming them for your change in posting.

Post by **_The Nehor** » Wed May 11, 2011 3:11 pm

Themis wrote:
The Nehor wrote:
There is no 'blame'.

Of course there is. You specifically say it was others postings that made you change your own. That is blaming them for your change in posting.

No, "blame" has a negative connotation that suggests there was a misdeed involved. I deny that there was a misdeed.

If you were to argue that the culture of the board made me change how I acted on said board I would not argue with you. If you argued that the dead hooker in my trunk would be alive if she didn't try to raise her rates at the end of our meeting I would not argue with you.

See the difference?

Post by **_Morley** » Wed May 11, 2011 3:28 pm

The Nehor wrote:
If you argued that the dead hooker in my trunk would be alive if she didn't try to raise her rates at the end of our meeting I would not argue with you.

Wow. No wonder you seem so angry this morning.

Post by **_Doctor Scratch** » Wed May 11, 2011 3:57 pm

Themis wrote:
The Nehor wrote:
Because I'm not interested in the morons here doing what they have done after being banned from another board. Holding massive meta-commentary sessions about it here and back-slapping each other over how superior this board is and how much courage was shown by those who were banned.

I knew you would not back it up, because you can't. LOL

The Nehor tends not to back up anything. Here he is on this thread, claiming to have posted "substance" at some point during his career on this board, and yet if you ask him to supply a single link to an old thread where he's done this, he won't do it. (Maybe Liz can do it for him? It was Liz, after all, who tried to engage him on the issue of one of BY's plural wives, and Nehor bailed out after Liz made mincemeat out of his sloppy reading comprehension and his tendentious and misogynist analysis. I mean, she absolutely demolished him. Perhaps he's still angry about that? About getting pwned by a woman?) For me, the "last straw" with Nehor was the post where he said that he'd be glad to "sacrifice" two airplanes a year just so he wouldn't be inconvenienced and forced to wait in longer lines due to increased security. He said this back in 2007 or thereabouts, so his idiocy and lack of substance extends at least as far back as that.

I mean, seriously: who says stuff like that?

Post by **_asbestosman** » Wed May 11, 2011 4:55 pm

asbestosman wrote:
The Nehor wrote:I have no interest in you or anyone else here following me there so I will say it's in the Land of Mordor where the shadows lie.
Facebook?

4chan?

Post by **_Themis** » Wed May 11, 2011 11:20 pm

The Nehor wrote:
No, "blame" has a negative connotation that suggests there was a misdeed involved. I deny that there was a misdeed.

If you were to argue that the culture of the board made me change how I acted on said board I would not argue with you. If you argued that the dead hooker in my trunk would be alive if she didn't try to raise her rates at the end of our meeting I would not argue with you.

See the difference?

Not really since the culture of the board has everything to do with deeds. Your remarks sure seemed to suggest you thought that they were negative so I still see it as blaming. Not that hard to understand.

DiscussMormonism.com