Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Morley
_Emeritus
Posts: 3542
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:19 pm

Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

Post by _Morley »

wenglund wrote:Let me try this again:

A couple of questions:

1) There were three things that I was testing by changing Will's name to harmony in the quote from Consigs. Can you Identify one or more of them?

2) For those tossing around the Misogyny label, if posters here have some rather nasty things to say about Will, does that mean they are men haters? What if they also say many of the same nasty things about other men, like DCP, myself, Droopy, Nehor, etc? Does that make them men haters?

3) Finally, given what liz indicated about the extensive moderating of not only posts by Will, but Kevin Graham and others as well, what would you think if it were actually Kevin who used the "C" word, but in reference to Will, rather than Will in reference to harmony, which seems to me far more likely, and is what I recall (hint: this relates indirectly to question #1).

Thanks, -Wade Englund-


For Pete's sake, Wade, stop playing "three guesses as what I'm thinking" games. Speak plainly as to whatever it is you're trying to say. Please.
_Ceeboo
_Emeritus
Posts: 7625
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 1:58 am

Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

Post by _Ceeboo »

Hey Wade,

wenglund wrote:
Can you Identify one or more of them?



Thanks, -Wade Englund-


I found two.

1. On the bottom left side of the coloring book cover, there was a cupcake in the tree.

2. On the top of the page, the elephant had an apple on his head.

Were there more?


Peace,
Ceeboo
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Re: Other Incidents

Post by _beastie »

wenglund wrote:
Isn't this about the 13th post since beastie said she was done with this thread?

Thanks, -Wade Englund-


I said the thread had run its course for me, which means I've gotten everything I was looking for out of it. That doesn't mean I won't still post out of sheer entertainment.

If I didn't still check in, I'd miss gems like this one:

Wade
My concern here isn't with Will's conduct, but personal smear threads like this.


LOL. This thread is entirely about Will's conduct. In order to determine whether or not this thread is simply a bunch of malicious 'smears' or if it accurately represents Will's behavior would require someone to, you know....be concerned with, or at least willing to investigate, Will's conduct. Which you aren't.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

Post by _beastie »

Droopy wrote:Interesting. After nearly forty pages of sound and fury, the initial, staunchly held claim that Will did, in point of fact, call Harmony the C word, has now been plea bargained down to the charge that Will "for all intents and purposes" called Harmony the C word.

And this is why we call this place, for all intents and purposes, "The Trailerpark."


Do you actually think that this thread was entirely about whether or not Will used the C-word?
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

Post by _moksha »

Has anyone thought of analyzing Will's quotes by the column and then shouting "presentism"?
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_wenglund
_Emeritus
Posts: 4947
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:25 pm

Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

Post by _wenglund »

Morley wrote: For Pete's sake, Wade, stop playing "three guesses as what I'm thinking" games. Speak plainly as to whatever it is you're trying to say. Please.


This was a test of inductive skills. Sorry, but you failed.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-
"Why should I care about being consistent?" --Mister Scratch (MD, '08)
_wenglund
_Emeritus
Posts: 4947
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:25 pm

Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

Post by _wenglund »

Ceeboo wrote:Hey Wade,

wenglund wrote:I found two.

1. On the bottom left side of the coloring book cover, there was a cupcake in the tree.

2. On the top of the page, the elephant had an apple on his head.

Were there more?

Peace,
Ceeboo


For a pre-schooler, that was as good a response as could be expected. [Thumbs up]

Thanks, -Wade Englund-
"Why should I care about being consistent?" --Mister Scratch (MD, '08)
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

Post by _beastie »

Wade,

You have the most delightful case of unwarranted condescension that I've ever seen.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_Kevin Graham
_Emeritus
Posts: 13037
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm

Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

Post by _Kevin Graham »

Droopy wrote:Hmmm, sounds like the typical blue collar union Democrat voter snarling under his breath as he gets into his Toyota Corolla after a hard day's work at the plant as he watches his boss get into his Lincoln Towncar.

These things all kind of "hang together" don't they?


I work for a company in Atlanta that hires hundreds of non-union "blue collar" workers and I can assure you that they are overwhelmingly Republican. But it is nice to see your true colors come forth as you attack the working class and continue to worship the wealthy.


Why do you hate unions so much, aside from the fact that Rush Limbaugh says you should? I've yet to find a Right Winger make a rational argument against Unions.
Post Reply