Doctor Scratch wrote:No, but you did say, in no uncertain terms, that it was a picture of your "employer" (If I recall correctly). You've also said definitively that you're the "IT Director" for Stamford Hospital. Well, if that's true, then you lied, right here on this thread, when you denied knowing any of the people that were named.
I could, of course, know them. Or I could not. That is not information that I'll allow you to have. Tough luck.
I don't think so, Simon. You can't scramble out of this without telling bald-faced lies. You've already "allowed" everyone on the board to have the information that you work in Stamford Hospital's IT department. You also said, w/ zero indication of equivocation, that a photo of your "work" was posted multiple times to the board. So playing dumb about the people listed on the Jigsaw page is, unarguably, a lie.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
Doctor Scratch wrote:Then you lied to the moderators, Simon, and to everyone else on the board.
This is certainly news to me.
Funny... I don't remember confirming or denying that I was the person in the picture.
You said you pressed the Report button. Then you must think that the pix contains in real life information about an MDB registrant, or else 'you cried wolf' (a lie). Which is it?
Doctor Scratch wrote:I don't think so, Simon. You can't scramble out of this without telling bald-faced lies. You've already "allowed" everyone on the board to have the information that you work in Stamford Hospital's IT department.
No. I said I was the IT director. You said that position doesn't exist, as far as you can tell. And you can't tell, because great pains have been taken to make sure that you and people like you don't know and that you never know. That must bother you deeply.
You also said, w/ zero indication of equivocation, that a photo of your "work" was posted multiple times to the board. So playing dumb about the people listed on the Jigsaw page is, unarguably, a lie.
A photo of my work was posted.
And hey, whatever happened to:
Scratch wrote:Let me say this loud and clear: I hereby promise to never start another DCP thread ever again.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
Have you ever relied on the work of conspiracy theorist apologists / filmmakers?
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
Have you ever relied on the work of conspiracy theorist apologists / filmmakers?
I don't know what you're talking about, and I don't think this is on topic.
You mean you've never relied on apologetic material from conspiracy-theorist Mormon filmmakers? Come on, Simon. Think.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
Doctor Scratch wrote:You mean you've never relied on apologetic material from conspiracy-theorist Mormon filmmakers? Come on, Simon. Think.
Get to the point, Scratch. I don't know any Mormon filmmakers, and I am not aware of any "conspiracy-theorist Mormon filmmakers."
Does the name "Thorpe" ring any bells?
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14