Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply

Top 5 Defenders

 
Total votes: 0

_Simon Belmont

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Simon Belmont »

Doctor Scratch wrote:Which means, of course, that all that's needed is a quick phone call or email. Your lies have been exposed yet again.



Your threats are ruining your credibility. How many times have you threatened to call my employer now? 10? How many times have you threatened to call the MI about Will Schryver?

Why do you make threats, Scratch? Is it because it makes you feel like a big tough guy or what?

Anyway, I'm unaffected.
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

Simon Belmont wrote:
Doctor Scratch wrote:Which means, of course, that all that's needed is a quick phone call or email. Your lies have been exposed yet again.



Your threats are ruining your credibility. How many times have you threatened to call my employer now? 10? How many times have you threatened to call the MI about Will Schryver?

Why do you make threats, Scratch? Is it because it makes you feel like a big tough guy or what?

Anyway, I'm unaffected.


Simon:

Maybe it's just me, but lying, generally speaking, is a bad thing. Right? So why do you lie? Does it make you feel like a big tough guy?
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_Simon Belmont

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Simon Belmont »

I didn't lie, but you did, when you said:

Scratch wrote:Let me say this loud and clear: I hereby promise to never start another DCP thread ever again.


Does lying make you feel like a real man/woman?
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Kishkumen »

Chap wrote:Yup, I get it: the suggestion is that the Director of the IT Department at Stamford Hospital (remember that's Simon Belmont, according to him) is not the guy with the apparently empty title “Department Director” of IT, whose identity is publicly available. It’s a ‘self-employed consultant’ who just spends most of his time there. And he is totally secret. Only the President knows his identity.


Who knows the truth, eh? My guess is that Simon proclaimed himself "Director" so he could look like a real Big Man on Campus. He pulled similar crap at Cassius, pretending he had a legitimate PhD, when he only possessed an MA. It was one of the many lapses in honesty and integrity that led to the unraveling of his relationship with Cassius. Simon is an inveterate fantasist and liar. Had he left his creativity in the realm of Cassius, it would be one thing. The fact is that he habitually lies about things that are very real and actually matter. I have lost most of the respect I once had for the guy.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Some Schmo »

Simon Belmont wrote: Does lying make you feel like a real man/woman?

Why would lying make him feel like a real hermaphrodite?
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Kishkumen »

Some Schmo wrote:
Simon Belmont wrote: Does lying make you feel like a real man/woman?

Why would lying make him feel like a real hermaphrodite?


Simon must be speaking from experience.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

Simon Belmont wrote:I didn't lie, but you did, when you said:

Scratch wrote:Let me say this loud and clear: I hereby promise to never start another DCP thread ever again.


Does lying make you feel like a real man/woman?


Come on now, Simon---there's a substantial difference between making a statement and then changing one's mind, vs. willfully doling out patently false information in the first place. I'm sure even you can distinguish the difference here.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

The Nehor wrote:This is the hypocritical nutjob who went crazy at the idea that someone would hire a PI to find his identity. Perhaps I should reconsider that course of action. The small dollop of money it would cost would be more then compensated for by the meltdown we'd get to see.

Something to think about anyway.


I thought you claimed to have nothing to do with that.... Simon implicated you, and you denied any involvement...

Are you and Simon friends in real life, Nehor?
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _The Nehor »

Doctor Scratch wrote:
The Nehor wrote:This is the hypocritical nutjob who went crazy at the idea that someone would hire a PI to find his identity. Perhaps I should reconsider that course of action. The small dollop of money it would cost would be more then compensated for by the meltdown we'd get to see.

Something to think about anyway.


I thought you claimed to have nothing to do with that....


I did and I had nothing to do with it.

Simon implicated you, and you denied any involvement...


And that denial was accurate. I considered it briefly after that situation arose. If you'll recall I thought it was a bad idea then.

Are you and Simon friends in real life, Nehor?


I'll trade that information for your real name. Deal?
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Kishkumen »

The Nehor wrote:I'll trade that information for your real name. Deal?


Why don't you just ask your buddy, Slimy? He claims to have figured it out.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
Post Reply