Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply

Top 5 Defenders

 
Total votes: 0

_Simon Belmont

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Simon Belmont »

Doctor Scratch wrote:Come on now, Simon---there's a substantial difference between making a statement and then changing one's mind, vs. willfully doling out patently false information in the first place. I'm sure even you can distinguish the difference here.


Well, hey, Scratch, if you can be inconsistent then I see no reason why you believe it is your place to pass judgement on another for a perceived inconsistency.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Kishkumen »

Simon Belmont wrote:Well, hey, Scratch, if you can be inconsistent then I see no reason why you believe it is your place to pass judgement on another for a perceived inconsistency.


Does it somehow make it less true?
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

Simon Belmont wrote:
Doctor Scratch wrote:Come on now, Simon---there's a substantial difference between making a statement and then changing one's mind, vs. willfully doling out patently false information in the first place. I'm sure even you can distinguish the difference here.


Well, hey, Scratch, if you can be inconsistent then I see no reason why you believe it is your place to pass judgement on another for a perceived inconsistency.


So, are you a consultant for IBM Global Services, then?
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

The Nehor wrote:
Simon implicated you, and you denied any involvement...


And that denial was accurate. I considered it briefly after that situation arose. If you'll recall I thought it was a bad idea then.


But not now?

Are you and Simon friends in real life, Nehor?


I'll trade that information for your real name. Deal?


Just ask Simon.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _The Nehor »

Doctor Scratch wrote:But not now?


Undecided, the prices are much lower then I expected.

Just ask Simon.


Nah, rather trade with you.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_Molok
_Emeritus
Posts: 1832
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 4:31 am

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Molok »

So who posted Scratch's identity on the MAD board a while back?? Was that you Simon?
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Kishkumen »

Molok wrote:So who posted Scratch's identity on the MAD board a while back?? Was that you Simon?


I think it was old Slimy.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _asbestosman »

The Nehor wrote:
Just ask Simon.


Nah, rather trade with you.

You would trust Scratch's word?
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_Simon Belmont

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Simon Belmont »

Molok wrote:So who posted Scratch's identity on the MAD board a while back?? Was that you Simon?



Of course not. I wouldn't do that, and I've never posted on the MAD/MDD board.
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _The Nehor »

asbestosman wrote:You would trust Scratch's word?


No.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
Post Reply