Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply

Top 5 Defenders

 
Total votes: 0

_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

Simon Belmont wrote:
Molok wrote:So who posted Scratch's identity on the MAD board a while back?? Was that you Simon?



Of course not. I wouldn't do that, and I've never posted on the MAD/MDD board.


Never posted as "Simon Belmont"? Or never posted at all? I happen to know for a fact that you communicate with some of the people who post there, so something about your statement here isn't quite right.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_Simon Belmont

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Simon Belmont »

Doctor Scratch wrote:Never posted as "Simon Belmont"? Or never posted at all? I happen to know for a fact that you communicate with some of the people who post there, so something about your statement here isn't quite right.



You know for a fact, huh? Well, I don't know who I've interacted with here who also post there, other than Dr. Peterson, Will Schryver, CaliforniaKid, and Mortal Man.

So yes, I have interacted with people who post here who also happen to post there.

Your point?
Last edited by _Simon Belmont on Fri May 13, 2011 6:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

Simon Belmont wrote:
Molok wrote:So who posted Scratch's identity on the MAD board a while back?? Was that you Simon?



Of course not. I wouldn't do that, and I've never posted on the MAD/MDD board.


Did you not post an image here at MDB that you claimed was me?
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_Simon Belmont

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Simon Belmont »

Here is my original statement:

Of course not. I wouldn't do that, and I've never posted on the MAD/MDD board.


This is neither MAD nor MDD.
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

Keep dodging, Simon.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _asbestosman »

The Nehor wrote:
asbestosman wrote:You would trust Scratch's word?


No.


You would be entertained by his deceptive answer as to his identity?
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_Simon Belmont

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Simon Belmont »

Doctor Scratch wrote:Keep dodging, Simon.



Right. It's okay if you are getting frustrated. It seems to be your lot in life to lose. Oh well.
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

Simon Belmont wrote:
Doctor Scratch wrote:Keep dodging, Simon.



Right. It's okay if you are getting frustrated. It seems to be your lot in life to lose. Oh well.


Simon,

It occurs to me that you never responded to my inquiries about you apparent affinity for a conspiracy-theorist LDS filmmaker named "Thorpe." You're a fan of this person's apologetics, aren't you, Simon?
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_Simon Belmont

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Simon Belmont »

Doctor Scratch wrote:Simon,

It occurs to me that you never responded to my inquiries about you apparent affinity for a conspiracy-theorist LDS filmmaker named "Thorpe." You're a fan of this person's apologetics, aren't you, Simon?



I don't know who that is.
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _The Nehor »

asbestosman wrote:You would be entertained by his deceptive answer as to his identity?


Hope springeth eternal.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
Post Reply