Other questions for William Schryver

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

Chalk this up to my current mooooooooood and then just ignore it.

Whatever works.

I wish that all I had to think about was the circumstances surrounding a guy getting his tooth knocked out and bagged up at age 17, who refers to women as "that" and also, being the guy who is responding to inquiry regarding said tooth being knocked out and bagged up at age 17....like anybody in the real world (there really is a real world) gives a damn about any of this for any reason.

But no. I am left looking at this thread (and others like it) wondering why in the hell anyone gives the most miniscule amount of air time to any of this, when there are real people in the real world in need of help and support or the car needs washing or the laundry needs doing or whatever the hell else could be accomplished in the time it has taken for people to examine and assess the account of some old guy addressing what happened to him at age 17 as if any of it actually mattered.

Okay I feel better. :-)

You may now return to your current exercise in futility and time wasting b***s***.

I mean it this time!
;-)

Hello,

Hypocrite!

I just finished detailing my car, buying dog food, running some errands, and now I'm watching a movie on TBS.

But “F” me if I decide to comment on a thread because Ms. Jersey Girl disapproves!

Oh me! Oh my! Whatever will I do??

That said, I apologize again for calling you names. It was rubbish.

V/R
Dr. Cam

[_Will Schryver]

I suspect the rumors are right, and Nomad is actually several different posters who share the handle. I think there is no doubt at times that it's you behind the Nomad mask. Other times, it may be someone else.

The things you suspect that are not so, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain all the books.

[_malkie]

Hello,

Mr. Schryver is a terrible liar.

1) I did not deny anything except that I did not lose a tooth in a fight.

2) I didn't.

He shoved his "never-met-a-bad-boy-she-didn't-like" girlfriend into me and then said something about "keep your hands off my girlfriend." To which I replied, after eyeing his girlfriend, "Believe me, I wouldn't want to lay my hands on that." *Note the perpetual insulting behavior toward women, in this case, an innocent girl who was shoved into him.

3) I then turned away from him... only to be blind-sided by a roundhouse right (complete with a large class ring protruding from its fist) which struck me in the mouth, completely knocking out my left front tooth, root and all. *Note, if your back is turned to your attacker, he hits you with his right fist, he's not knocking out your LEFT tooth. That's impossible.

4) Perhaps, then, this story from my youth was dredged up to demonstrate the kind of ultimate fate that awaits those who persecute me without cause. As such it constitutes a cautionary tale for the majority of The Great and Spacious Trailer Park©. *Note, Mr. Schryver refused my offer to spar at a gym.

Ah, Mr Smartypants - typical critic - you didn't think it all the way through. If your back is turned to your attacker, and he hits you with his right fist, he could knock out your LEFT tooth. He could have been suspended from the ceiling!

[_malkie]

PLEASE, let this post be the last one in the thread. DO NOT respond any further. Let it sink!

Sorry, STS, I responded to an earlier post, and didn't see your post till it was too late (;=(

[_Gadianton]

At any rate, I have no doubt that the mob here will continue to do as it always does: distort, misrepresent, and deliberately deceive in its incessant crusade of calumny against my person.

While I agree with you to the extent that I think your handlers should be the target of scrutiny more so than you, I have to wonder if you aren't seeking a backlash.

As EA mentioned, there is some question about your forthcomingness in general. I don't doubt your story here, and I have no problem believing that you were the victim, and that the fight went down more or less as you say. What I find interesting is that, exactly at the point where the minor role of the bully's girlfriend is concerned, you are compelled by honesty and integrity to not leave out even the slightest detail regarding her trashiness. I mean, you don't in general seem compelled to be so thorough in your disclosures. So if you were interested in avoiding more "distortion," or backlash from the "mob" here, why not tailor your lack of disclosure more judiciously, to better fit your needs? You could have told that same story and left out the girlfriend altogether.

Then again, if you were seeking the outrage, you played your hand perfectly.

[_Will Schryver]

At any rate, I have no doubt that the mob here will continue to do as it always does: distort, misrepresent, and deliberately deceive in its incessant crusade of calumny against my person.

While I agree with you to the extent that I think your handlers should be the target of scrutiny more so than you, I have to wonder if you aren't seeking a backlash.

As EA mentioned, there is some question about your forthcomingness in general. I don't doubt your story here, and I have no problem believing that you were the victim, and that the fight went down more or less as you say. What I find interesting is that, exactly at the point where the minor role of the bully's girlfriend is concerned, you are compelled by honesty and integrity to not leave out even the slightest detail regarding her trashiness. I mean, you don't in general seem compelled to be so thorough in your disclosures. So if you were interested in avoiding more "distortion," or backlash from the "mob" here, why not tailor your lack of disclosure more judiciously, to better fit your needs? You could have told that same story and left out the girlfriend altogether.

Then again, if you were seeking the outrage, you played your hand perfectly.

Of course it's not even in the realm of possibility that I was merely reciting the unadorned facts of the matter.

Right?

Nevertheless, in the interest of full disclosure, the girl in question was actually an active participant in the ambush. Using the same MO, they had already committed another assault outside the school--to a report of which the policemen previously mentioned were just arriving as the drunken pugilist and his teenage harlot were drawing their mark on me.

In a great many ways, they remind me of several individuals I know from the GSTP©. Funny, that.

[_Nightlion]

I suspect the rumors are right, and Nomad is actually several different posters who share the handle. I think there is no doubt at times that it's you behind the Nomad mask. Other times, it may be someone else.

The things you suspect that are not so, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain all the books.

Freakin' blasphemin' prick. Gawl. Tell us 'bout the tractor Will.

[_Gadianton]

Of course it's not even in the realm of possibility that I was merely reciting the unadorned facts of the matter.

I think you misunderstood me entirely, Will. I have no reason to doubt the "unadorned facts" of this particular matter. What I'm saying is that given your history of not always disclosing facts, you could have applied your powers of fact suppressing in this particular case in order to avoid the unhappy coincidence coming across as a woman hater, again.

Nevertheless, in the interest of full disclosure, the girl in question was actually an active participant in the ambush...

Indeed, if it comes to disparaging a woman, guilty though she may be, you're ready to step up to the plate in full disclosure, and then some. I'm saying that since avoiding the facts isn't beneath you anyway, and given you've built a major resume here as a chauvinist, it could have been to your advantage to lie -- or rather, stop short of the "full disclosure" -- about something that would never be held against you by anyone.

In a great many ways, they remind me of several individuals I know from the GSTP©. Funny, that.

In what ways, and what individuals are you referring to?