A brief look back and then some commentary

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_hatersinmyward
_Emeritus
Posts: 671
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 3:12 am

Re: A brief look back and then some commentary

Post by _hatersinmyward »

Dr. Shades wrote:
LDSToronto wrote:I'm being serious - no one who calls themselves a decent human being would ever talk the way [Will] does, or say the mean-spirited things he says. The fact that he is LDS has little to do with it.

I think it has EVERYTHING to do with it. William believes that his calling & election have been made sure, so he feels God has given him a golden ticket to do, say, and act any way he pleases without consequence.


read this

http://www.slugmag.com/issue.php?id=232&start=10

this magazine from salt lake confirms my statements.

Enjoy… make sure the nehor, 8-bit, dr. shades and abestosman read this. they all cut their legs off by denouncing me and now everyone who posts here will know it.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: A brief look back and then some commentary

Post by _harmony »

hatersinmyward wrote:read this

http://www.slugmag.com/issue.php?id=232&start=10

this magazine from salt lake confirms my statements.

Enjoy… make sure the nehor, 8-bit, dr. shades and abestosman read this. they all cut their legs off by denouncing me and now everyone who posts here will know it.


I don't see how this helps you. Perhaps I am missing something?
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_hatersinmyward
_Emeritus
Posts: 671
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 3:12 am

Re: A brief look back and then some commentary

Post by _hatersinmyward »

harmony wrote:
hatersinmyward wrote:read this

http://www.slugmag.com/issue.php?id=232&start=10

this magazine from salt lake confirms my statements.

Enjoy… make sure the nehor, 8-bit, dr. shades and abestosman read this. they all cut their legs off by denouncing me and now everyone who posts here will know it.


I don't see how this helps you. Perhaps I am missing something?



yeah but its cool.
_stemelbow
_Emeritus
Posts: 5872
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:40 pm

Re: A brief look back and then some commentary

Post by _stemelbow »

Some Schmo wrote:I don't know that too many people actually do this (if anyone). I certainly don't mock people just because they're LDS. I mock dumb beliefs. I mock intellectual dishonesty. I mock faith because it requires one be irrational. I mock hypocrisy. I mock BS.

There are several Mormons/religious people that have written on this board that I respect for one reason or another (liz, abs-man, Jason, Ceeboo, Jersey Girl, and ttribe come to mind). It doesn't mean I don't recognize that some of the swipes I've taken at religious belief haven't included portions of their world views.

I'm of the opinion, however, that the people I respect deserve my honesty rather than hedging what I think in the name of "religious tolerance." I can say with pride that I have no tolerance for intellectual dishonesty (even my own, when I catch it) and I don't intend to start. I don't think there's anything redeeming about that sort of tolerance, just like I don't tolerate injustices toward women, children, homosexuals, people of another color, etc. Why should I?

I will always speak out against what I consider poor reasoning. It doesn't mean I'm mocking people. It means I'm mocking bad thinking. That's it.

I've mocked your comments on several occasions, stem, when I thought it was appropriate. Lately, however, it seems you're showing us a different side of you, a more reasonable side, and I don't feel moved to mock what you've been saying recently. It doesn't deserve it. I suspect you're being more honest now, and I respect that (my biggest complaint about you when you first started posting was that you sounded like you were full of crap - remember "steaming bowl"?) These days, you aren't giving me the ammo to shoot yourself, so what's there to say?

It always has been and always will be about the ideas or communicated persona, not the people. I don't know the people, but I can see before my very eyes the words on the screen.


As it is, I’ve learned to appreciate your posts. Giving people chances seems to work afterall. And, I really appreciate it when people open up and explain themselves like you have done above. Thanks, Schmoe.
Love ya tons,
Stem


I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
_stemelbow
_Emeritus
Posts: 5872
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:40 pm

Re: A brief look back and then some commentary

Post by _stemelbow »

Dr. Shades wrote:I think it has EVERYTHING to do with it. William believes that his calling & election have been made sure, so he feels God has given him a golden ticket to do, say, and act any way he pleases without consequence.


This is absurd. There are plenty of LDS who don't act the same as Will, there are plenty of non-LDS who act far worse than Will.
Love ya tons,
Stem


I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
_Wisdom Seeker
_Emeritus
Posts: 991
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 3:55 am

Re: A brief look back and then some commentary

Post by _Wisdom Seeker »

Kishkumen wrote:
Wisdom Seeker wrote:We all wished you would have turned out and grown up like your younger brother.


What an amazing coincidence. I was thinking exactly the same thing just 5 minutes ago. I thought, "well, if Simon is a wash, at least this stem fellow is pretty cool." I'm totally serious. That is exactly what I thought. And this OP confirms it. Stem thinks about stuff. Even if I don't always agree, I respect that he reflects and weighs things. He gets big props for this.


I too have been more impressed with this brother of Simon. Keep up the good thoughtful commentary. Pep-Pep.
Post Reply