Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.

Top 5 Defenders

 
Total votes: 0

_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Kishkumen »

Simon Belmont wrote:Do you know what "take issue with" means?


Yes, I do Simon. Something that is important is worthy of criticism or dispute in regards to its flaws. Something that is not important probably isn't worthy of such critical attention or disagreement.

So, no, I don't think LDS apologetics is a "stupid thing" to take issue with.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

Simon Belmont wrote:
by the way: Just joined "The Guild of Guilds (TGoG)"


Are you a member of Nehor's guild, Simon?
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Kishkumen »

Doctor Scratch wrote:Are you a member of Nehor's guild, Simon?


Nehor and Simon aren't the kind to kiss and tell.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Simon Belmont

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Simon Belmont »

Doctor Scratch wrote:Are you a member of Nehor's guild, Simon?



It isn't Nehor's Guild! I started the "Let's go to Taco Bell at 2:00AM Guild (LgtTBa2G)."
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Kishkumen »

Simon Belmont wrote:It isn't Nehor's Guild! I started the "Let's go to Taco Bell at 2:00AM Guild (LgtTBa2G)."


Is that how you maintain your girlish figure?
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

Your smokescreen isn't fooling anybody, Simon.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_Simon Belmont

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Simon Belmont »

Doctor Scratch wrote:Your smokescreen isn't fooling anybody, Simon.


You're absolutely correct. It wasn't Taco Bell... it was Del Taco.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _Kishkumen »

Simon Belmont wrote:
Doctor Scratch wrote:Your smokescreen isn't fooling anybody, Simon.


You're absolutely correct. It wasn't Taco Bell... it was Del Taco.


Wow. You have no standards.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _The Nehor »

Doctor Scratch wrote:Nehor, come on, now. There's no need for yet another meltdown.


You're mistaking glee for a meltdown. A common mistake amongst the socially impaired such as yourself.

All I did was joke with you about posting very late at night. You've made a number of comments in the past that suggest you have a powerful affinity for WoW/D&D-style activities, and thus I felt it was reasonable to assume/joke about the possibility (or fact?) that you were up late playing games or whatever with your "guild." There's no need to flip out over this, Nehor.


I wasn't flipping out. I was pointing out the idiocy of you trying to trap me by pointing out I must play WoW because I know what a guild is.

What's weird about your responses (and Simon's, for that matter) is that you seem more intent on probing into what, exactly, I meant by "guild."


Only because you are trying to suggest that there are lots of different kinds of guilds you could have meant. I'm mostly doing it to make you squirm and try to explain it. It's funny.

If you have nothing whatsoever to do with any "guild" in any way, shape, or form, then I rather doubt you would have followed this line of inquiry.


Watching you humiliate yourself is reward enough.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: Defenders of the Faith on MDB who have the best arguments

Post by _The Nehor »

Doctor Scratch wrote:So, are you going to tell us about the guild you belong to, Nehor?


Sure, I don't belong to anything that is called a guild. Let us be fair now. Do you?

I do want to hear more of your lame 'Renn Fair' derails of how you didn't mean an MMO guild. Please continue.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
Post Reply