Consiglieri BANNED from MAD!

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: Consiglieri BANNED from MAD!

Post by _EAllusion »

Odd that you posted that Nehor.

I was just about to point out that DCP sticks out in my mind as the one who complained the most and in the most hyperbolic ways about the UTLM message board's Orwellian tactics. That might not be technically correct, but he stands out the most in my memory. He loved making Nazi comparisons. He even called their equivalent of Juliann "Der Fuhrer" or something close. And to be fair to UTLM, I don't think they were as Orwellian as MADB is. DCP doesn't flip out about MADB's tactics though, but that is another story.

This is a perfectly postworthy topic. To get instabanned for bringing it up is just so blatantly manipulative massaging of the message that I don't know how you can stomach it.
Last edited by Guest on Sat May 21, 2011 7:49 pm, edited 2 times in total.
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: Consiglieri BANNED from MAD!

Post by _EAllusion »

Here's a thread where various personalities who still post on MADB flip out about UTLM's biased moderating tactics. See if the complaints ring familiar:

http://pacumenispages.yuku.com/topic/28 ... TLM?page=1
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: Consiglieri BANNED from MAD!

Post by _EAllusion »

I think I'll take a quote from that thread and say it just flat applies to the situation here. Just replace "the Tanners'" with "FAIR's" and you are golden:

I can't believe that anybody can defend der Webfhrer's behavior without embarrassment, or with a straight face. The situation here is so far removed from that on the Tanners' message board -- in terms of freedom, tolerance, and the absence of der Webfhrer's uniquely arbitrary form of virtual tyranny -- that we might as well be talking about different planets.
_MrStakhanovite
_Emeritus
Posts: 5269
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:32 am

Re: Consiglieri BANNED from MAD!

Post by _MrStakhanovite »

Anyone else lol when Nehor posted a magic card?
_why me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9589
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:19 pm

Re: Consiglieri BANNED from MAD!

Post by _why me »

TrashcanMan79 wrote:Anyone know the details? I was reading his now-locked "Heavenly Mother" thread over there and saw "Banned" underneath his avatar. When did this happen? And why?


Consig was mainly banned for his Racism thread. His comments to the posters who responded to him left much to be desired. So, his banning was an accumulation of many things and not anything in particular.
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world.
Joseph Smith


We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…”
Joseph Smith
_TrashcanMan79
_Emeritus
Posts: 832
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:18 pm

Re: Consiglieri BANNED from MAD!

Post by _TrashcanMan79 »

why me wrote:
TrashcanMan79 wrote:Anyone know the details? I was reading his now-locked "Heavenly Mother" thread over there and saw "Banned" underneath his avatar. When did this happen? And why?


Consig was mainly banned for his Racism thread. His comments to the posters who responded to him left much to be desired. So, his banning was an accumulation of many things and not anything in particular.

I'd probably be a bit more inclined to consider this explanation if not for the fact that RockSlider was also instabanned for starting a thread similar to Consig's. Both were banned without any kind of word of caution and their threads were deleted as opposed to just being locked. No, to me it would appear that the MAD moderators don't want the Schryver/MI thing mentioned, let alone discussed, on their so-called "discussion" board.

Be that as it may, do you have a link to that racism thread? Thanks.
_RockSlider
_Emeritus
Posts: 6752
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:02 am

Re: Consiglieri BANNED from MAD!

Post by _RockSlider »

why me wrote:Consig was mainly banned for his Racism thread. His comments to the posters who responded to him left much to be desired. So, his banning was an accumulation of many things and not anything in particular.


The justice of the whole matter is in the fact that why me is still a board member in good standing there.

edit:

why me
from the der Webfhrer Pahoran's own mouth:
viewtopic.php?p=456835#p456835

dang you are irritating.
_why me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9589
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:19 pm

Re: Consiglieri BANNED from MAD!

Post by _why me »

RockSlider wrote:
why me wrote:Consig was mainly banned for his Racism thread. His comments to the posters who responded to him left much to be desired. So, his banning was an accumulation of many things and not anything in particular.


The justice of the whole matter is in the fact that why me is still a board member in good standing there.

edit:

why me
from the der Webfhrer Pahoran's own mouth:
viewtopic.php?p=456835#p456835

dang you are irritating.


I did not get the impression that consig posted a thread from this board. However, he did mention this board not by name. But if one reads his comments on his racism thread, one can see that he was rather flippant in his responses. And I did say that it was not any one particular thing but a series of things that tired the moderators.

In the past, consig was a valuable member of the discussion board. But now, his bitterness shows in many posts. To see his digression is not a pretty site for the old timers who remember the good ol' days of his bull's eye posts. And we need to remember that the mods are mainly members of the old timers group.
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world.
Joseph Smith


We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…”
Joseph Smith
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Consiglieri BANNED from MAD!

Post by _harmony »

jskains wrote:They defiantly are inconsistent in their policy enforcement.

JMS


Actually, they are very consistent with their policy enforcement. It's the policy itself that is inconsistent. In other words, they are consistently inconsistent.

And every time they do something remarkably stupid, an angel applauds.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_why me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9589
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:19 pm

Re: Consiglieri BANNED from MAD!

Post by _why me »

TrashcanMan79 wrote:
Be that as it may, do you have a link to that racism thread? Thanks.


I don't think that the Will happening matters much over there for the mods. The mods are mainly posters from the board who have been members of the discussion board for quite some time. There are a couple of exceptions. We need to remember that there are many mods on MDD. It is not a cloning system.
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world.
Joseph Smith


We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…”
Joseph Smith
Post Reply