I agree. The posts are vulgar. What do you think of my explanation and apology? Would that have any bearing on the way you regard my contributions to this forum?
V/R Dr. Cam, NC
When you posted as "antishock8" the majority of your posts looked like this. Searching through the archives yields a very angry, misanthropic intellectual midget.
That's why you are now trying to overcorrect with your "Hello, V/R" thing.
Simon Belmont wrote:I should hope not. The hypocrisy coming from CamNC4Me is astounding.
Doc Cam,
Is it true that you are an active LDS male who is making a bid to publish your work with a scholarly outfit that is officially supported by an LDS university?
I mean, the way Simon Belmont is scrutinizing you here, you would definitely think that this must be the case. Otherwise, why the fuss?
Thanks,
K
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
Simon himself has said a number of remarkably vulgar and disgusting things. He may hold the record for having the highest percentage of his posts moved down to Telestial due to outright vulgarity and filthiness.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
Simon Belmont wrote:I should hope not. The hypocrisy coming from CamNC4Me is astounding.
Doc Cam,
Is it true that you are an active LDS male who is making a bid to publish your work with a scholarly outfit that is officially supported by an LDS university?
I mean, the way Simon Belmont is scrutinizing you here, you would definitely think that this must be the case. Otherwise, why the fuss?
Thanks,
K
So only those who make your cut of "active LDS male[s] who [are] making a bid to publish [their] work with a scholarly outfit that is officially supported by an LDS university" should refrain from making vulgar comments? The rest of us, well, have at it?
I mean, there would be no fuss is Cam didn't keep on Will about this. It's very hypocritical. He has no room to talk... at all.
Simon Belmont wrote:So only those who make your cut of "active LDS male[s] who [are] making a bid to publish [their] work with a scholarly outfit that is officially supported by an LDS university" should refrain from making vulgar comments? The rest of us, well, have at it?
Simon, you could use a little lesson in practicality here. How interested do you think NAMIRS is in Doc Cam's vulgarity?
Simon Belmont wrote:I mean, there would be no fuss is Cam didn't keep on Will about this. It's very hypocritical. He has no room to talk... at all.
Did Doc Cam start this thread?
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
Simon Belmont wrote:So, in order for you to speak out against nasty behavior, the offender must be in the process of being considered for publication by NAMIRS?
What?
So, in order for a person to bring forth evidence of the nasty behavior of the person under scrutiny in the OP, that person must be spotless from similar behavior?
And, surely anyone on his high horse about this kind of "hypocrisy" must also be free of taint, right Simon?
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist