The MDB Schryver Jihad: How to Smear Your Opponent

[_Buffalo]

And when you find those lost sheep, be sure to bring them back into the fold with Christian compassion, by calling them bitches, sluts and buggerers. :)

I can see the point of communicating to people in their own culturally imbued language or idioms, that is except for those, like many here, who may be seriously, though selectively, metaphor-challenged (i.e. those who can't, in some cases, tell the difference between literal and figurative expressions).

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

I can see now that you weren't serious about "reaching out to lost sheep."

[_wenglund]

Nor would a person with even a modest grasp of logic extrapolate that Buffulo's desire was to turn specifically what you said into what he said, rather than the obvious point that every time you talk, you want to convince people that everything you say has a purpose rather than the fact that you regularly f*** up and stick you foot in your mouth (probably because you haven't managed to orally reach your dick yet, but that's another matter).

Honestly, do you think you're fooling anyone? Seriously?

...alrighty, then.

Thanks, -Some Schmo-

I wouldn't dare even pretend to fool the likes of someone posting so credibly under the name of "Some Schmo." That would be as ill-advise as attempting to pull the wool over the eyes of Chief Inspector Jacque Clouseau. LOL

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

[_Buffalo]

No rational person with even a modest grasp of logic would extrapolate that "lesson" from what I said--which explains why you did. Enjoy the fog.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

And yet it seems to be a constant theme with you. Everything proves your point. It's your favorite "argument." I guess it beats actually responding to specific criticisms.

[_Some Schmo]

I can see now that you weren't serious about "reaching out to lost sheep."

Wade has a very long history of try to push that tidbit of BS down people's throats. His "I'm on a christian mission" comments don't even inspire a chuckle any more (they certainly used to). It's just part of the tidal wave of meaningless, nonsensical crap coming from him keyboard these days.

[_Some Schmo]

I wouldn't dare even pretend to fool the likes of someone posting so credibly under the name of "Some Schmo." That would be as ill-advise as attempting to pull the wool over the eyes of Chief Inspector Jacque Clouseau. LOL

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

Liar. You dare to do it all the time. (Hell, you want to convince us that credibility can somehow be derived from someone's alias, ffs. Obviously, you'll try just about any BS on for size).

Just because we aren't fooled doesn't mean you're not trying.

Thanks, -Some Schmo-

[_Buffalo]

I can see now that you weren't serious about "reaching out to lost sheep."

Wade has a very long history of try to push that tidbit of BS down people's throats. His "I'm on a christian mission" comments don't even inspire a chuckle any more (they certainly used to). It's just part of the tidal wave of meaningless, nonsensical crap coming from him keyboard these days.

I think Wade's top concerns these days are:

1. Sticking up for Schryver, his man-crush
2. Trying to appear erudite through thesaurus abuse, ala Droopy. It's too bad there isn't an online "point" generator he could use in tandem with thesaurus.com

[_wenglund]

I can see now that you weren't serious about "reaching out to lost sheep."

An understandable, though no less mistaken conclusion, from someone not only seriously metaphor-challenged, but also selectively humor impaired, and yet who ironically presumes that anything said by someone posting anonymously under the name of "Buffalo" could be taken seriously. What a joke. LOL

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

[_Some Schmo]

...that anything said by someone posting anonymously under the name of "Buffalo" could be taken seriously. What a joke. LOL

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

Wade world logic: "It didn't fool anyone the first time, but maybe if I repeat it enough, some will start to form opinions about people's credibility based on their screen names. If repetition works with my testimony, it must work on other forms of BS! Yeah, that's the ticket!"

You're right about one thing, Wade:

What a joke. LOL

Thanks, -Some Schmo-

[_Runtu]

An understandable, though no less mistaken conclusion, from someone not only seriously metaphor-challenged, but also selectively humor impaired, and yet who ironically presumes that anything said by someone posting anonymously under the name of "Buffalo" could be taken seriously. What a joke. LOL

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

Maybe it's just that I'm feeling even worse than usual today, but I'm not seeing humor in your posts. That I have to resist the urge to return your snarkiness in kind suggests that it's time for a break for me. So, I'm off to take a pain pill, and I may be back sometime in the future. Just not today, and most likely not this week.

[_Ceeboo]

Perhaps you have forgotten, but we saints have a moral imperative to seek out the lost sheep, including those who have wandered into and taken up residence in the backwaters of insignificance.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

Hi Wade,

I was going to, then decided against it, then decided to go ahead and post.

Soooo, with great caution and respect, I will offer this simple question to you (I hope it comes across as I intend it)

Did you ever consider the mere possibility that the "lost sheep" might be you?

So that I am clear, that was not meant to offend and it was a very serious question.

Peace,
Ceeboo