The MDB Schryver Jihad: How to Smear Your Opponent

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Re: The MDB Schryver Jihad: How to Smear Your Opponent

Post by _Some Schmo »

Ceeboo wrote: Did you ever consider the mere possibility that the "lost sheep" might be you?

Wade? Honest self-reflection?

ROTFLMAO

Ahhhh, Ceeboo. (*wipes tears from eyes*) You made my day.
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
_wenglund
_Emeritus
Posts: 4947
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:25 pm

Re: The MDB Schryver Jihad: How to Smear Your Opponent

Post by _wenglund »

Some Schmo wrote: Liar. You dare to do it all the time. (Hell, you want to convince us that credibility can somehow be derived from someone's alias, ffs. Obviously, you'll try just about any BS on for size).

Just because we aren't fooled doesn't mean you're not trying.

Thanks, -Some Schmo-


Let's see...I am being called a liar by someone using a fake ID, and somehow I am the one that is supposedly trying to fool people all the time. You know, you can be quite funny even when you aren't trying.

Thanks -Wade Englund-
"Why should I care about being consistent?" --Mister Scratch (MD, '08)
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: The MDB Schryver Jihad: How to Smear Your Opponent

Post by _Buffalo »

wenglund wrote:
Buffalo wrote:I can see now that you weren't serious about "reaching out to lost sheep."


An understandable, though no less mistaken conclusion, from someone not only seriously metaphor-challenged, but also selectively humor impaired, and yet who ironically presumes that anything said by someone posting anonymously under the name of "Buffalo" could be taken seriously. What a joke. LOL

Thanks, -Wade Englund-


As usual, you fail to make any points. Strained insults and posturing combined with an inability to express a complete thought are the hallmarks of a wenglund post.

Of course we all know that the best way to reach out to lost sheep is to insult them, and then insult their intelligence, as you and Will are fond of doing.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_wenglund
_Emeritus
Posts: 4947
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:25 pm

Re: The MDB Schryver Jihad: How to Smear Your Opponent

Post by _wenglund »

Runtu wrote: Maybe it's just that I'm feeling even worse than usual today, but I'm not seeing humor in your posts. That I have to resist the urge to return your snarkiness in kind suggests that it's time for a break for me. So, I'm off to take a pain pill, and I may be back sometime in the future. Just not today, and most likely not this week.


You are a very wise man. If snarkyness is not your thing, then it is best to avoid the snark-infested waters of this board.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-
"Why should I care about being consistent?" --Mister Scratch (MD, '08)
_wenglund
_Emeritus
Posts: 4947
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:25 pm

Re: The MDB Schryver Jihad: How to Smear Your Opponent

Post by _wenglund »

Ceeboo wrote: Hi Wade,

I was going to, then decided against it, then decided to go ahead and post.

Soooo, with great caution and respect, I will offer this simple question to you (I hope it comes across as I intend it)

Did you ever consider the mere possibility that the "lost sheep" might be you?

So that I am clear, that was not meant to offend and it was a very serious question.

Peace,
Ceeboo


No offense taken. (To be honest, I could find nothing in your post that I would view as the least bit offensive.)

In answer to your question, I have not only considered the possibility that I might be a l"lost sheep," but I freely accept that from the perspective of other Christian denominations, I am a "lost sheep."

Now, I don't know what my answer supposedly says about my capacity for "honest self reflection," but evidently the person en-nobly calling himself "Some Schmo" has prejudged it a joke. So, of course I should take him seriously. LOL

Thanks, -Wade Englund-
"Why should I care about being consistent?" --Mister Scratch (MD, '08)
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Re: The MDB Schryver Jihad: How to Smear Your Opponent

Post by _Some Schmo »

wenglund wrote: Let's see...I am being called a liar by someone using a fake ID, and somehow I am the one that is supposedly trying to fool people all the time. You know, you can be quite funny even when you aren't trying.

Thanks -Wade Englund-

And, as if we didn't have enough evidence in this thread alone, Wade comes along with more BS, expecting us all to go along with him and equivocate a screen name with a piece of legal identification. I guess Wade would have us believe that anyone using a message board alias is trying to fool everyone.

I don't remember ever claiming my actual name was Some Schmo. Is that what you're trying to say, Wade? Again... seriously?

Pro tip: When trying to convince people you're not full of crap, it's best to make your comments more, not less plausible. Also, even if you could diminish my credibility, it wouldn't in any way help since yours is pretty much beyond repair.

Thanks -Some Schmo-
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
_wenglund
_Emeritus
Posts: 4947
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:25 pm

Re: The MDB Schryver Jihad: How to Smear Your Opponent

Post by _wenglund »

Buffalo wrote:As usual, you fail to make any points. Strained insults and posturing combined with an inability to express a complete thought are the hallmarks of a wenglund post.

Of course we all know that the best way to reach out to lost sheep is to insult them, and then insult their intelligence, as you and Will are fond of doing.


A guy calling himself "Buffalo" feels himself insulted by me. Now, there is an unintended, though ready-made comedy sketch for SNL.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-
"Why should I care about being consistent?" --Mister Scratch (MD, '08)
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: The MDB Schryver Jihad: How to Smear Your Opponent

Post by _Jersey Girl »

wenglund wrote:
Some Schmo wrote: Liar. You dare to do it all the time. (Hell, you want to convince us that credibility can somehow be derived from someone's alias, ffs. Obviously, you'll try just about any BS on for size).

Just because we aren't fooled doesn't mean you're not trying.

Thanks, -Some Schmo-


Let's see...I am being called a liar by someone using a fake ID, and somehow I am the one that is supposedly trying to fool people all the time. You know, you can be quite funny even when you aren't trying.

Thanks -Wade Englund-


Are you saying that because a poster uses a screen name that they haven't the right to call someone a liar?
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: The MDB Schryver Jihad: How to Smear Your Opponent

Post by _Buffalo »

wenglund wrote:
Buffalo wrote:As usual, you fail to make any points. Strained insults and posturing combined with an inability to express a complete thought are the hallmarks of a wenglund post.

Of course we all know that the best way to reach out to lost sheep is to insult them, and then insult their intelligence, as you and Will are fond of doing.


A guy calling himself "Buffalo" feels himself insulted by me. Now, there is an unintended, though ready-made comedy sketch for SNL.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-


Apparently this is your first day posting on online forums. "Buffalo" is my moniker. Most people who post on forums do so using monikers rather than their real name. Sharing personal information with strangers on the internet isn't wise.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moniker

Buffalo, by the way, were highly regarded by the people you think of as "Lamanites."

http://www.kwintessential.co.uk/article ... Art--/2228

The Native Americans attached particular reverence to the buffalo. The buffalo was taken as a symbol of the many bounties that life has to offer. This was because the buffalo was a source of many benefits to the Native Americans.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: The MDB Schryver Jihad: How to Smear Your Opponent

Post by _Buffalo »

Jersey Girl wrote:
Are you saying that because a poster uses a screen name that they haven't the right to call someone a liar?


He should tell that to bcspace, Pahoran, Droopy, Nomad (Will), etc.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
Post Reply