From My Informant: Did Brian Hauglid Betray Schryver?

[_Kishkumen]

More lame deflections. You know I am right about your imaginary informants, and all your banal game-playing will not change that.

Lame deflections from what? Seems to me that you are the one trying to deflect.

[_Droopy]

for what it's worth, I've had confirmation from a secondary source that this "intel" is correct.

The un-named secondary source in this case is Harvey the rabbit.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

I KNEW, I absolutely KNEW Scratch was consorting and fraternizing with Pookas. That explains a great deal regarding his, uh, posting history here.

[_Droopy]

More lame deflections. You know I am right about your imaginary informants, and all your banal game-playing will not change that.

Lame deflections from what? Seems to me that you are the one trying to deflect.

I think perhaps the most egregious deflection possible here would be taking seriously the implication in your previous post the you understand what it would mean for Book of Abraham apologetics to be "done well."

Leave that, Kish, to those who actually do comprehend the meaning of the concept "scholarship."

[_wenglund]

More lame deflections. You know I am right about your imaginary informants, and all your banal game-playing will not change that.

Lame deflections from what?

I clearly identified it in an earlier post. Read and learn.

Seems to me that you are the one trying to deflect.

Naturally, you would see it that way. Such is germane to the upside-down and imaginative view of the Scratch conspiratorial dream team.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

[_Kevin Graham]

Help him achieve cognition, wade. You can do it.

[_Droopy]

Help him achieve cognition, wade. You can do it.

Not possible. Scratch doesn't function upon the principles of cognition.

A characteristic shared by some others here in the GASTP, it should be mentioned.

[_sock puppet]

I am amazed that people that would interpret a warm feeling in their bosoms to be a message from god confirming the truth of Mormonism are so quick to question someone's sources identified as an unnamed, but real person. If that isn't irony, for you, I don't know what is.

[_wenglund]

I am amazed that people that would interpret a warm feeling in their bosoms to be a message from god confirming the truth of Mormonism are so quick to question someone's sources identified as an unnamed, but real person. If that isn't irony, for you, I don't know what is.

May I be one of the first to congratulate you on becoming a believing member of the Church of Scratchetology. I would not have guessed that anyone would believe that Scratch's informants were real, but evidently you do. And, with a screen name like "Sock Puppet," you should fit in well. From the looks of things, maybe you will soon be joined by Kish, if he hasn't joined already.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

[_Doctor Scratch]

Of course my informants are real, Wade. It just angers you that I protect them.

[_Simon Belmont]

Of course my informants are real, Wade.

CFR