Aren't you glad Christ was not named Butts?

Post by **_beefcalf** » Wed May 25, 2011 1:05 am

Blasphemy is a victimless crime.

_Simon Belmont · Post by **_Simon Belmont** » Wed May 25, 2011 1:07 am

beefcalf wrote:Blasphemy is a victimless crime.

So is porno, I guess. Does that make it right?

Post by **_beefcalf** » Wed May 25, 2011 1:13 am

Simon Belmont wrote:
beefcalf wrote:Blasphemy is a victimless crime.

So is porno, I guess. Does that make it right?

It makes it not wrong.

Post by **_Joseph** » Wed May 25, 2011 1:15 am

blemish wrote: "So is porno, I guess. Does that make it right?"

Pornography in the US is legal. Obscenity is not.

_Simon Belmont · Post by **_Simon Belmont** » Wed May 25, 2011 1:17 am

Joseph wrote:blemish wrote: "So is porno, I guess. Does that make it right?"

Pornography in the US is legal. Obscenity is not.

Then you are illegal.

Post by **_Dr. Shades** » Wed May 25, 2011 4:34 am

Simon Belmont wrote:Why were Nightlion and my posts moved without this entire thread being moved? Are the moderators seriously of the opinion that the question "Aren't you glad Christ was not named Butts?" was not meant to enflame, to stir the water, to offend Christians here on this board? If you're going to move my posts, move the whole thread -- for it is a steaming pile of feces.

They were split off because they were born of a hostile derailment (i.e., purposely having nothing to do with the subject matter of the opening post of the thread).

The subject matter and/or offensiveness of a thread doesn't matter. Staying on topic does.

Post by **_Jersey Girl** » Wed May 25, 2011 4:45 am

Dr. Shades wrote:
Simon Belmont wrote:Why were Nightlion and my posts moved without this entire thread being moved? Are the moderators seriously of the opinion that the question "Aren't you glad Christ was not named Butts?" was not meant to enflame, to stir the water, to offend Christians here on this board? If you're going to move my posts, move the whole thread -- for it is a steaming pile of feces.

They were split off because they were born of a hostile derailment (i.e., purposely having nothing to do with the subject matter of the opening post of the thread).

The subject matter and/or offensiveness of a thread doesn't matter. Staying on topic does.

Like the topic isn't hostile? Come on...the Temple stuff goes into the Telestial...why isn't this one in the Telestial?

Post by **_asbestosman** » Wed May 25, 2011 5:20 am

Dr. Shades wrote:They were split off because they were born of a hostile derailment (i.e., purposely having nothing to do with the subject matter of the opening post of the thread).

The subject matter and/or offensiveness of a thread doesn't matter. Staying on topic does.

So, why did my silly Final Fantasy V picture remain?

Post by **_Dr. Shades** » Wed May 25, 2011 5:49 am

Jersey Girl wrote:Like the topic isn't hostile?

Topics are allowed to be hostile as long as they aren't personal attacks.

Come on...the Temple stuff goes into the Telestial...why isn't this one in the Telestial?

Because it has nothing to do with the temple and isn't a personal attack.

Post by **_Nightlion** » Wed May 25, 2011 8:10 am

Dr. Shades wrote:
Simon Belmont wrote:Why were Nightlion and my posts moved without this entire thread being moved? Are the moderators seriously of the opinion that the question "Aren't you glad Christ was not named Butts?" was not meant to enflame, to stir the water, to offend Christians here on this board? If you're going to move my posts, move the whole thread -- for it is a steaming pile of feces.

They were split off because they were born of a hostile derailment (i.e., purposely having nothing to do with the subject matter of the opening post of the thread).

The subject matter and/or offensiveness of a thread doesn't matter. Staying on topic does.

I guess then that you never peruse any threads I start. Not that I mind you sending the present consideration into oblivion. I don't care. This is bizarre, however, that you pick this particular thread to demand strict adherence to topic. GAWL! What was the real reason. Hmm?

DiscussMormonism.com

Aren't you glad Christ was not named Butts?

Re: Aren't you glad Christ was not named Butts?

Re: Aren't you glad Christ was not named Butts?

Re: Aren't you glad Christ was not named Butts?

Re: Aren't you glad Christ was not named Butts?

Re: Aren't you glad Christ was not named Butts?

Re: Aren't you glad Christ was not named Butts?

Re: Aren't you glad Christ was not named Butts?

Re: Aren't you glad Christ was not named Butts?

Re: Aren't you glad Christ was not named Butts?

Re: Aren't you glad Christ was not named Butts?