No Homosexuals wanted

[_Joseph]

I niether want nor don't want homosexuals or any other kind of sexuals. Unless I am personally involved it is none of my damn business what others do in their private life.

Why should I be part of keeping two or more people who want to commit to a life together apart?

If they/anyone wants their shot at happiness, as long as it does hot harm children and those involved are consenting adults, it is their life to live and I wish them all the best.

[_hatersinmyward]

rule 1- never trust a fag.

[_beefcalf]

Homosexuality has been observed in countless animal species.

There are all-male species and all-female species. And even in many mammal species, there are frequent instances of homosexual behavior.

So, taking what we learned from Boyd K. Packer, that Heavenly Father would never make someone 'that way', how shall we view these aberrations in the animal kingdom?

Perhaps it is Satan influencing these animals to do these evil acts, knowing that humans will watch and some will be motivated to copy them, thereby ensnaring another human soul for himself?

Whatever you may say or not say about homosexuality, please don't try to pretend it's not 'natural'.

[Guest]

Homosexuality has been observed in countless animal species.

There are all-male species and all-female species. And even in many mammal species, there are frequent instances of homosexual behavior.

So, taking what we learned from Boyd K. Packer, that Heavenly Father would never make someone 'that way', how shall we view these aberrations in the animal kingdom?

Perhaps it is Satan influencing these animals to do these evil acts, knowing that humans will watch and some will be motivated to copy them, thereby ensnaring another human soul for himself?

Whatever you may say or not say about homosexuality, please don't try to pretend it's not 'natural'.

getting off is natural, but there are no 100% queer mammals. show me a male dog that takes it in the butt and gives only to other male dogs in the butt and the same dog would never consider going for a bitch in heat. all-male species don't have a choice to be queers they are just an 'all-male species'. animals don't know right from wrong.

[_hatersinmyward]

people are the only species on this planet capable of lying.

some animals for instance know if they display a certain behavior they may get rewarded somehow but that isn't bullshitting.

human queers are bullshitters so no accurate comparison can be made between a fag and some animal. the animal is not capable of lying.

[_just me]

Animals aren't capable of hate, either. Lucky them.

[_hatersinmyward]

Animals aren't capable of hate, either. Lucky them.

:P

on another note, exactly.

[_beefcalf]

Homosexuality has been observed in countless animal species.

There are all-male species and all-female species. And even in many mammal species, there are frequent instances of homosexual behavior.

So, taking what we learned from Boyd K. Packer, that Heavenly Father would never make someone 'that way', how shall we view these aberrations in the animal kingdom?

Perhaps it is Satan influencing these animals to do these evil acts, knowing that humans will watch and some will be motivated to copy them, thereby ensnaring another human soul for himself?

Whatever you may say or not say about homosexuality, please don't try to pretend it's not 'natural'.

getting off is natural, but there are no 100% queer mammals. show me a male dog that takes it in the butt and gives only to other male dogs in the butt and the same dog would never consider going for a bitch in heat. all-male species don't have a choice to be queers they are just an 'all-male species'.

I'm not sure what your point is...

My point is that homosexuality is found frequently in nature. Therefore, calling homosexuality 'unnatural' is not accurate.

You seem to be saying that there are no 100% homosexual dogs. Are there 100% homosexual men? If a homosexual man was highly aroused and was presented with the choice between nothing and a woman, how many would say 'nothing'? Dog homosexual behavior, often argued by homophobes as simply a dominance behavior, does appear to me, at least sometimes, to be purely sexual.

by the way: Animals ARE capable of deception.

[_hatersinmyward]

no dog introduces itself as gay.

if you were presented with a female... if a wolf in "the wild" were to be caught being gay it would be exiled from the pack. so the "exclusion of gays is also natural." humans have decided homosexuals are to be cast out of the group. that is our choice as a species.

key word choice.

[_Morley]

no dog introduces itself as gay.

if you were presented with a female... if a wolf in "the wild" were to be caught being gay it would be exiled from the pack. so the "exclusion of gays is also natural." humans have decided homosexuals are to be cast out of the group. that is our choice as a species.

key word choice.

Where are you getting this stuff? For example, I've never read that "if a wolf in 'the wild' were to be caught being gay it would be exiled from the pack." As I understand it, not all members of a wolf pack mate, even if they are heterosexual. And not all human societies (past or present) have decided that "homosexuals are to be cast out of the group." Are you just making stuff up to justify your own prejudices? If not, help me out here.