Some Schmo wrote:The "you don't know/understand everything I believe therefore your arguments are invalid" defense never fails to crack me up.
An argument is invalid if it never touches what someone believes, which is the problem.
Some Schmo wrote:The "you don't know/understand everything I believe therefore your arguments are invalid" defense never fails to crack me up.
68Cadillac wrote:Buffalo wrote:Most Christians believe in some sort of end times/second coming doctrine. It's all equally absurd.
This is exactly what I'm trying to say with that comic (which someone else made and I just linked to). I don't care that the 38,000+ christian denominations can't agree about what to call the mythical event End-Of-The-World-When-Jebus-Comes-Back. It's absurd no matter how you slice it. And it's sliced 38,000+ ways currently.
Did I hurt someone's feelings in pointing this out? So be it.
MrStakhanovite wrote:Buffalo wrote:Mark 14:62
61 Again the high priest asked him, “Are you the Messiah, the Son of the Blessed One?”
62 “I am,” said Jesus. “And you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Mighty One and coming on the clouds of heaven.”
And?
If a person is a preterist, historicist, or an idealist when it comes to eschatology, the ways of exegeting that passage are legion. The Son of Man is a loaded phrase with a lot of baggage, it could very well mean that the humble poor will be the ones sitting at the right hand of God (as per Matthew 5).
Giving one verse, devoid of context, and in English doesn’t establish much.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.