The MAD Board, Promoting Frivolous Lawsuits or Just Crazy?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Everybody Wang Chung
_Emeritus
Posts: 4056
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 2:53 am

The MAD Board, Promoting Frivolous Lawsuits or Just Crazy?

Post by _Everybody Wang Chung »

Not that it really matters, but the MAD Board has updated its guidelines for Libel: http://www.mormondialogue.org/topic/54467-board-notice/

Julianne piped in right away with this gem (of course referring to MormonDiscussions.com):

It sets precedent for future rulings.
Anybody want to place bets on how long it will take someone to sue and identify everyone hiding out on a certain board known for libeling Mormons who defend the faith?


Julianne also took a pop shot at MsJack and believes that Will Schryver has a slam dunk case against MsJack:

Trouble is, you will have to prove money damages and you have to prove that something they said isn't true. I can only think of one person who would have a slam dunk lawsuit for libel right now because not everything that was published was true and the accuser actually published the damage she caused....either very brave or very stupid.



Weird, paranoid and utterly hilarious.
"I'm on paid sabbatical from BYU in exchange for my promise to use this time to finish two books."

Daniel C. Peterson, 2014
_Infymus
_Emeritus
Posts: 1584
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:10 pm

Re: The MAD Board, Promoting Frivolous Lawsuits or Just Crazy?

Post by _Infymus »

And it tends to work doesn't it? I think they've found that it scatters the critics. All Dan Peterson has to do is even mention litigation and everyone runs, the threads wither and die, and hundreds of threads disappear from online forums.

If you can't win with a testimony, win with a lawsuit.
_gramps
_Emeritus
Posts: 2485
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:43 pm

Re: The MAD Board, Promoting Frivolous Lawsuits or Just Crazy?

Post by _gramps »

Be scared. Really scared when Julianne (where is the transcript?)

starts talking out of her a##.

And this next threat should really cause fear in the hearts of all men:

mfbukowski:

Great idea- that sounds like a lot more fun than video games!

I have a few in the crosshairs already!


That bukowski is one funny guy, I tell you!
I detest my loose style and my libertine sentiments. I thank God, who has removed from my eyes the veil...
Adrian Beverland
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Re: The MAD Board, Promoting Frivolous Lawsuits or Just Crazy?

Post by _Some Schmo »

Just the latest in a long series of idiotic ramblings from julianne.

*shrug*
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
_Bond James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 2690
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:21 pm

Re: The MAD Board, Promoting Frivolous Lawsuits or Just Crazy?

Post by _Bond James Bond »

So every post should start with "in my opinion"?
Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded.-charity 3/7/07

MASH quotes
I peeked in the back [of the Bible] Frank, the Devil did it.
I avoid church religiously.
This isn't one of my sermons, I expect you to listen.
_Spurven Ten Sing
_Emeritus
Posts: 1284
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:01 am

Re: The MAD Board, Promoting Frivolous Lawsuits or Just Crazy?

Post by _Spurven Ten Sing »

mfbukowski molests stray cats and dogs.

Now sue me.
"The best website in prehistory." -Paid Actor www.cavemandiaries.com
_MsJack
_Emeritus
Posts: 4375
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 5:06 am

Re: The MAD Board, Promoting Frivolous Lawsuits or Just Crazy?

Post by _MsJack »

Everybody Wang Chung wrote:Julianne also took a pop shot at MsJack and believes that Will Schryver has a slam dunk case against MsJack

Mmm. Notice the response from Tim Tribe:
ttribe wrote:
juliann wrote:Trouble is, you will have to prove money damages and you have to prove that something they said isn't true. I can only think of one person who would have a slam dunk lawsuit for libel right now because not everything that was published was true and the accuser actually published the damage she caused....either very brave or very stupid.

You're way off base. Assembling a consolidation of links to the person's OWN WORDS in context, does not (under any circumstance I can imagine) constitute libel.

Thanks, ttribe.

EDIT: My post originally stated that Ttribe is a lawyer. He has just corrected me. He is a forensic accountant who does a lot of work in the law as an expert witness.

My apologies for the mistake and mix-up, ttribe.
Last edited by Guest on Tue May 31, 2011 6:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"It seems to me that these women were the head (κεφάλαιον) of the church which was at Philippi." ~ John Chrysostom, Homilies on Philippians 13

My Blogs: Weighted Glory | Worlds Without End: A Mormon Studies Roundtable | Twitter
_Bond James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 2690
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:21 pm

Re: The MAD Board, Promoting Frivolous Lawsuits or Just Crazy?

Post by _Bond James Bond »

Side note: has anyone ever actually read the MAD board rules? I'm not sure how they hold any discussion over. Well I know, the rules are unfairly followed only when LDS posters feel threatened, but if the rules were in fact followed and a poster were so inclined almost every topic worth discussing could be objected to. Read and quake in fear.

MDD RULES

Guidelines for Mormon Dialogue and Discussion Board:

Before posting on this board, read everything below. Don't gloss over it and attempt to claim later that you didn't know the rules. You agreed to follow the guidelines upon registration.
Failure to do so may result in a suspension, banning, or your posting ability being severely limited.

The Purpose of Mormon Dialogue

People of all faiths are welcome to engage in gentlemanly discussion about topics related to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Our two most important rules are:

1. Be respectful of the moderators. We don't expect you to agree with our decisions, but we do expect to be respected for the work we put into this board. Do not start threads to criticize moderators, complain
about thread closures, or backtalk when we intervene. Furthermore, do not send us insulting, threatening, or taunting private messages. Just because no one else sees it doesn't mean we won't discipline you for such behavior.

2. Be respectful of each other. This should be a matter of common sense, but we have a detailed list below of the kind of behavior that won't be tolerated.

Mocking each others' beliefs
Judging others
Personal attacks. You may dispute a member's opinion, but you may not label them for having that opinion.
Psychoanalyzing others
Attempting to provoke people
Posting in real life information about board members
Profanity and vulgarity
Pretending to be someone you aren't, namely, posing as an ex-Mormon when you clearly are not. This only leads to feelings of hostility. We will allow inconsistencies in your story to be pointed out for the purpose of protecting anyone here you are trying to deceive.
Altering members quotes on the board
Quoting members in your signature without obtaining their permission
Choosing offensive avatars or signatures
Copying and pasting material and claiming it as your own or posting anything copyrighted
Derailing threads with irrelevant or unwanted commentary (i.e. If a discussion is about the nature of the Godhead, don't inject comments like, "There
is no God." You can start your own thread about evidences of God's existence.)
Telling others how to behave. Anything you find objectionable should be reported using the button located in each post.
Refusing to provide appropriate references to support your statements
Badgering a participant for an answer when it has already been given
Creating another user name while you are suspended. This will result in being banned permanently
Creating another user name to send a private message to a member who has blocked you from doing so. You are not entitled to contact anyone who doesn't
want to be contacted.
Violating standard rules of debate such as extreme comparisons and hyperbole
Topics We Don't Allow
Personal topics such as "Why I Left the Church" threads. This is not a support group. If you are having a spiritual crisis and need help, contacting your local leaders would be the
appropriate action and of course, taking your problem to our Father in Heaven. We do care very much for struggling members, but we don't want to see you made a target for judgment and insults. Don't make yourself the subject.
Anything that resembles what you would find in The National Enquirer or other tabloids (i.e. LDS members accused of bad behavior. These discussions are not productive and only lead to
judgment and speculation involving people we don't know.)
Proselyting or "witnessing" from either side. Preaching doesn't create a discussion. It is one sided.
Personal Squabbles. If you have a bone to pick with someone else, this is not the place to do it.
Politics (unless directly related to the church).
Sexually themed threads. These tend to become distasteful and we have some
younger participants. Discussing sexual behavior of LDS leaders, past or present, will not be allowed.
Suicide threats. If you are suicidal, please seek professional help. We sincerely care about you, but we can't allow threads of this nature. Not everyone will have the sensitivity you need and they might actually make things worse.
This is not a free speech board. It's a respectful speech board. We want participation from LDS and non-LDS people. Mocking LDS beliefs will drive away LDS members. This means:
Do not use offensive terms for things we hold sacred.
Do not post temple content or links to temple content.
Do not use nicknames for LDS leaders. Example: Calling Joseph Smith "Joe" is not acceptable
Do not post anything else you know is meant to do nothing more than push others' buttons.
Libel is not tolerated and you may be held legally accountable.
LDS members: You are expected to show the same level of courtesy to other faiths as we want participation from non-LDS people.

Reporting Posts to Moderators

Report a post if it is spam or violates any of the above.

If there are a series of objectionable posts from one person in a single thread, you only need to report one post. It calls our attention to the whole thread.

Do not report the same post twice.

Do not report posts simply because you don't like someone's opinion. You may instead respectfully disagree with them.

Private messages that are harassing or violate other board rules may also be reported. When reported, the message appears in a report folder and when necessary, we can access all logs in our
database of private exchanges. We are telling you this for your security.

Your Personal Responsibility

Exercise good judgment. Don't give out too much personal information
about yourself and don't assume you know anyone well enough on this
message board to do so. Any reasonable person will understand if you
don't want to provide more details about yourself than you are
comfortable with.

Don't ask us to ban you. You are responsible for what you post and the amount of time you spend here.

Social Hall and The Chat room

These two areas are only for friendly discussion. If you use them to argue, you will lose your privileges.

We hope this will be a positive and friendly atmosphere for everyone to discuss topics of interest. Thank you for registering.

Digital Millennium Copyright Act

We respect your intellectual property, if you feel that this site is violating your copyrights please contact us (Board Administration) by using this LINK. With applicable information in accordance to the law which must include:

Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 512©, to be effective, the Notification must include the following:

(i)
A physical or electronic signature of a person authorized to act on
behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.

(ii)
Identification of the copyrighted work claimed to have been infringed,
or, if multiple copyrighted works at a single online site are covered by
a single notification, a representative list of such works at that
site.

(iii) Identification of the material that is claimed to be
infringing or to be the subject of infringing activity and that is to be
removed or access to which is to be disabled, and information
reasonably sufficient to permit Newport to locate the material.

(iv)
Information reasonably sufficient to permit Newport to contact the
complaining party, such as an address, telephone number, and, if
available, an email address.

(v) A statement that the complaining
party has a good faith belief that use of the material in the manner
complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or
the law.

(vi) A statement that the information in the
notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, that the
complaining party is authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an
exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.

Release for use:

As a poster on Mormon Dialogue and Discussion you are granting us permission to use any material posted on this site whether it is multimedia or print and that you are the rightful owner of said material.


Sincerely,

The Moderation Team

These guidelines can be updated with out notice.
Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded.-charity 3/7/07

MASH quotes
I peeked in the back [of the Bible] Frank, the Devil did it.
I avoid church religiously.
This isn't one of my sermons, I expect you to listen.
_bcspace
_Emeritus
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:48 pm

Re: The MAD Board, Promoting Frivolous Lawsuits or Just Crazy?

Post by _bcspace »

They're more of what you'd call guidelines than actual rules.....
Machina Sublime
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: The MAD Board, Promoting Frivolous Lawsuits or Just Crazy?

Post by _EAllusion »

MsJack -

She's probably referring to the c-word accusation, which in addition to probably being true, wasn't presented in a way that can constitute libel. You're allowed to present evidence that someone said something even if they deny it. Juliann probably just takes it as simple fact that the accusation was a trumped up lie, thus making you guilty of libel.

If you claim Juliann lied about having a court-like transcript by presenting a case that she did just that, you can't be shown to be guilty of libel simply because she denies lying.
Last edited by Guest on Tue May 31, 2011 6:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply