MsJack wrote:I can't even begin to say how tickled I am that the term "Willpologist" is catching on. That's just fabulous.
I think it works because the idea of being a Willpologist is so utterly pathetic. I mean, it is one thing to defend a religion, but Will's rancid behavior? Some people have no dignity.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
Kishkumen wrote:I think it works because the idea of being a Willpologist is so utterly pathetic. I mean, it is one thing to defend a religion, but Will's rancid behavior? Some people have no dignity.
Exactly why I've long referred to you and others as Scratchpologists.
Simon Belmont wrote:If I tell you the sky is falling, am I a skypologist?
As long as you are able to deny any evidence to the contrary then you are indeed a skypologist. Remember, your opponents have the burden of proof that the sky is not falling. In the meantime, let's rally around any charges against Foxy Locksy.
Simon Belmont wrote:Exactly why I've long referred to you and others as Scratchpologists.
Yeah, you clearly have a different sense of humor from mine. You think Will is funny, while I think Scratch is funny. To each his own, I suppose.
At the end of the day, I would rather have fun with a guy poking fun at apologists than side with a narcissist who uses apologetics as a cover for indulging his own ego. I am not saying I am innocent, but I do have some standards.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist