Romney/Palin in 2012?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Joseph
_Emeritus
Posts: 3517
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 11:00 pm

Romney/Palin in 2012?

Post by _Joseph »

http://www.deseretnews.com/article/7053 ... icial.html

Mitt the moronic priesthood type is running now. Maybe he will hook up with Palin so he has a women to boss around?

He can flip flop and she won't notice a thing.
Last edited by Guest on Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"This is how INGORNAT these fools are!" - darricktevenson

Bow your head and mutter, what in hell am I doing here?

infaymos wrote: "Peterson is the defacto king ping of the Mormon Apologetic world."
_Kevin Graham
_Emeritus
Posts: 13037
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm

Re: Romney/Palin ni 2012?

Post by _Kevin Graham »

God I hope so.... becauuse they'd lose.
_Jason Bourne
_Emeritus
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:00 pm

Re: Romney/Palin ni 2012?

Post by _Jason Bourne »

It will never happen.

Romney is not dumb enough to pick Palin as a running mate.

He also know that at least right now, he has a good shot especially if the economy continues to sputter.
_DarkHelmet
_Emeritus
Posts: 5422
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:38 pm

Re: Romney/Palin ni 2012?

Post by _DarkHelmet »

The country is in bad shape right now and Obama doesn't seem to have an answer. We need a strong leader at the top, but nobody in the GOP looks promising and Obama will get the Democrat nomination. Things are going to be tough for a while.
"We have taken up arms in defense of our liberty, our property, our wives, and our children; we are determined to preserve them, or die."
- Captain Moroni - 'Address to the Inhabitants of Canada' 1775
_honorentheos
_Emeritus
Posts: 11104
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 5:17 am

Re: Romney/Palin in 2012?

Post by _honorentheos »

Whenever I hear someone say they think the President doesn't matter, I am reminded of this.

The republican form of government that was envisioned by the founders and enfranchised in the constitution is based on a simple but profound truth - it is unreasonable to expect enough of the mass population to be more fully informed on an issue than an elected representative could become. The solution isn't in jumping wildly to a truly democratic national executive; certainly not before we can prove we are able to participate in a simple election without jingoism and bias politics (i.e. - how a person looks on camera, how nice they smile, etc.) becoming the tools of the trade. When the political machine can not assume that their only job is to get voters to "not vote for the other guy" then we may be working our way in the right direction. Until then, the idea is just a revamp of the French Revolution.
The world is always full of the sound of waves..but who knows the heart of the sea, a hundred feet down? Who knows it's depth?
~ Eiji Yoshikawa
_Polygamy-Porter
_Emeritus
Posts: 8091
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 1:07 am

Re: Romney/Palin ni 2012?

Post by _Polygamy-Porter »

Jason Bourne wrote:It will never happen.

Romney is not dumb enough to pick Palin as a running mate.

He also know that at least right now, he has a good shot especially if the economy continues to sputter.

Yeah and many of his supporters in Massachusetts said that he would always support a woman's choice on abortion and support gay marriage..

He will pick Palin as his running mate if his republican party leadership tells him to do so. He has no choice.
New name: Boaz
The most viewed "ignored" poster in Shady Acres® !
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Romney/Palin ni 2012?

Post by _harmony »

Polygamy-Porter wrote:He will pick Palin as his running mate if his republican party leadership tells him to do so. He has no choice.


Then he will lose.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
Post Reply