CFR
The argument by Spurven was quite compelling. I read through the thread last night and he is right. What jumped out at me also was the fact that William was quick to attack Spurven as if he were his enemy. The fact that Spurven appears in the list provided by your "informant" is pretty strong evidence that William is he, since he is the only person on the planet that would mistake Spurven as one of Will's enemies. And of course, this is assuming you actually received an anonymous email to begin with. Frankly, I think you're just making this up.
And you know this how? (I am asking because I know for a fact that it is diametrically incorrect. I simply omitted mentioning that part of the email.)
Well I assumed you were being upfront by providing everything your "informant" said in the previous citation. So now you're saying your informant included Bokovoy in the group? Well that should be all the evidence we need to know it is complete BS since Bokovoy has stated on numerous occasions that he is not involved, nor does he have any interest in Will's apologetics. Do you two really want to challenge the integrity and credibility of David Bokovoy? Please, please, please, let that be your plan! LOL!
I am only pressing you on all these points because of your penchant for calling people idiotic, moronic, and behind, and to help boost the unwavering confidence several MDer's have recently expressed regarding your legendary research and analytical skills. LOL
No, you just like asking tons of questions because you think that gives you an edge in appearing to be scoring points. But you spend all your time asking questions so you won't have too spend any answering them.
Now just to summarize what we know:
1. It is a fact that NAMI was contacted by other LDS scholars, including Brian Hauglid.
2. It is a fact that Bokovoy has from day one, shown absolutely no interest in hindering Will's efforts in publication.
3. It is a fact that virtually everyone on this forum has expressed a desire to see William published by NAMI.
4. What I say is supported by one of the most respected LDS scholars there is. It is also supported by the folks at NAMI.
5. What you say is contradicted by several respected LDS scholars, and supported only by your anonymous informant. An informant who, for all you know, is in no more of a position to know the inside scoop on these matters, than the Pope.
Never come to a gunfight with a wiffle ball.