Boy, was I wrong
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 14216
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am
Re: Boy, was I wrong
All the mindless conspiracy theories aside, here's what I don't understand.
Isn't Bokovoy a valuable apologist? Why are these people willing to throw him under the bus for Will?
Is it because Bokovoy doesn't treat critics as if they're the spawn of satan?
Isn't Bokovoy a valuable apologist? Why are these people willing to throw him under the bus for Will?
Is it because Bokovoy doesn't treat critics as if they're the spawn of satan?
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.
Penn & Teller
http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
Penn & Teller
http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 4947
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:25 pm
Re: Boy, was I wrong
Kevin Graham wrote:CFR
The argument by Spurven was quite compelling. I read through the thread last night and he is right. What jumped out at me also was the fact that William was quick to attack Spurven as if he were his enemy. The fact that Spurven appears in the list provided by your "informant" is pretty strong evidence that William is he, since he is the only person on the planet that would mistake Spurven as one of Will's enemies. And of course, this is assuming you actually received an anonymous email to begin with. Frankly, I think you're just making this up.
Evidently, you lack sufficient intelligence to remember what the CFR was specifically in regards to. So, let me remind you. You said that I was duped by a Will pseudonym. Your argument above claims the evidence is strong that the email was from Will. You also express skepticism about me having received such an email. Nowhere in the above do you provide the least argument that the email was from a Will pseudonym. Care to try again Einstein?
Well I assumed you were being upfront by providing everything your "informant" said in the previous citation.
You obviously assumed incorrectly. Like Bokovoy, I excluded portions of the email that I though might inadvertently reveal the identity of the sender. Bokovoy's name was a part of the excluded portion.
So now you're saying your informant included Bokovoy in the group?
No, not the group I explicitly mentioned. I am saying his name was mentioned in the email, contrary to your false claim.
Well that should be all the evidence we need to know it is complete BS since Bokovoy has stated on numerous occasions that he is not involved, nor does he have any interest in Will's apologetics.
There you go, jumping to false conclusions again. Your rant above assumed my answer to your question would be Yes. Well, it wasn't. Don't you feel stupid now?
Do you two really want to challenge the integrity and credibility of David Bokovoy?
No. In fact, were you paying closer attention, and were really up to your faux legendary investigative skills, you would know that I most willingly took David at his word.
Thanks, -Wade Englund-
"Why should I care about being consistent?" --Mister Scratch (MD, '08)
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 21373
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm
Re: Boy, was I wrong
wenglund wrote:No. In fact, were you paying closer attention, and were really up to your faux legendary investigative skills, you would know that I most willingly took David at his word.
Thanks, -Wade Englund-
So your source is not reliable as far as David is concerned, but otherwise credible.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 14216
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am
Re: Boy, was I wrong
All I have to say to you, Wade, is that you should not trust the person who sent you the email at all. He/she lied.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.
Penn & Teller
http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
Penn & Teller
http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 21373
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm
Re: Boy, was I wrong
wenglund wrote:And, why is Kish writing to David for confirmation if, again, David lacked involvement?
Just curious.
Thanks, -Wade Englund-
Uh, didn't you claim that David received the same email you did? So, if that is true, then he should be able to confirm that.
?
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 4947
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:25 pm
Re: Boy, was I wrong
MrStakhanovite wrote:wenglund wrote:...like when you claimed to have seen Will use the "C" word?
Not really Wade.
Very believable, Stak. LOL
Thanks, -Wade Englund-
"Why should I care about being consistent?" --Mister Scratch (MD, '08)
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 4947
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:25 pm
Re: Boy, was I wrong
beastie wrote:All the mindless conspiracy theories aside, here's what I don't understand.
Isn't Bokovoy a valuable apologist? Why are these people willing to throw him under the bus for Will?
Is it because Bokovoy doesn't treat critics as if they're the spawn of satan?
Who is allegedly throwing Bokovoy under the buss? (CFR)
Thanks, -Wade Englund-
"Why should I care about being consistent?" --Mister Scratch (MD, '08)
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 4947
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:25 pm
Re: Boy, was I wrong
Kishkumen wrote:wenglund wrote:And, why is Kish writing to David for confirmation if, again, David lacked involvement?
Just curious.
Thanks, -Wade Englund-
Uh, didn't you claim that David received the same email you did?
No. I simply drew a few useful comparisons.
So, if that is true, then he should be able to confirm that.
It's not. You, like your beloved Kevin, jumped to a false conclusion.
Thanks, -Wade Englund-
"Why should I care about being consistent?" --Mister Scratch (MD, '08)
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 2690
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:21 pm
Re: Boy, was I wrong
MrStakhanovite wrote:B23 wrote:No it was me. I'm Spartacus! ;)
LOL
I gotta learn to make my B.S. less believable. I'm glad somebody caught on.
I was hoping for a chorus of "I'm Spartacus!" but no one apparently watches good movies anymore. :D
Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded.-charity 3/7/07
MASH quotes
I peeked in the back [of the Bible] Frank, the Devil did it.
I avoid church religiously.
This isn't one of my sermons, I expect you to listen.
MASH quotes
I peeked in the back [of the Bible] Frank, the Devil did it.
I avoid church religiously.
This isn't one of my sermons, I expect you to listen.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 5269
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:32 am
Re: Boy, was I wrong
wenglund wrote:Very believable, Stak. LOL
And I'm okay with that Wade, everyone has a different reason to believe me or not to believe me.