My response to Juliann and Dan G

[_Yoda]

I posted this on the other forum.

I thought I would re-post it here:


This posted by Nemesis a few moments ago:

Hey juliann this is for you!

Those who live by the sword die by the sword, sweets. If you want to take on my attorneys, be my f***ing guest.

So if the tables were turned they would just sue you. But its ok cause they are not an apologist nor claimed to be, just an active member of the church.

I'll respond.

DanG, you're still the same slimy douche bag you've always been....with a minute ounce of reading comprehension.

Juliann was on her high horse stating that SGW was certainly within his rights to sue MDB, involve attorneys, and take the board down.

In the next breath, she threatens to post MY copyrighted material, and claims that I would not have grounds for suit.

What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

For the record, I was NOT supportive of SGW's images being published on MDB. I have been away from my computer on vacation and didn't even SEE the thread in question. Had I seen it, I probably would have had most of you folks here pissed at me because I would have removed them. Then again, we would still have a board up, if that were the case.

I have been one of the strongest advocates of keeping away from posting in real life images, and all of you guys KNOW that!

Of course, Juliann wouldn't...or if she does, she wouldn't care because she hates me.

This is a convenient way for her to twist the knife because she never could successfully do it before.

So, Juliann, if you're reading this....No, I don't think that any of this in real life stuff should have been posted. I think that everyone is entitled to his/her anonymity on website forums as a matter of safety.

So if you think I am crying double-standard, you are dead wrong.

My point is....if SGW can contact an attorney...you can damn well bet if you pull anything, I will do the same.

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

Hello,

Has anyone seen the Juliann meme generator. ******* pricelss. Priceless...

V/R
Dr. Cam

Post Script- I can't wait for someone to do a Mr. Peterson meme...

[_lostindc]

wow, I did not realize nemesis had such a potty mouth!

[_TrashcanMan79]

Has anyone seen the Juliann meme generator. ******* pricelss. Priceless...

That would be "Mad Juliann" at memegenerator.net for you kids following along at home. Current winner: "IF I HAD A BAN FOR EVERY BAN I BANNED, I'D BAN A BANNED BAN-BAN BANNING A BAN!"

[_Dr. Shades]

Liz:

I'm probably just stupid, but in your post I can't figure out who was replying to and quoting whom.

Who wrote, "Hey juliann this is for you!" . . . ?

Who said, "Those who live by the sword die by the sword, sweets. If you want to take on my attorneys, be my f***ing guest." . . . ? Also, to whom was he or she responding when he or she stated that?

In addition, who said, "So if the tables were turned they would just sue you. But its ok cause they are not an apologist nor claimed to be, just an active member of the church." . . . ? And in that statement, who is "you," and who is "they?"

Lastly, are DanG and Nemesis the same person?

Sorry to be a pain, but I'm being honest when I tell you that I can't figure it out.

[_harmony]

Liz:

I'm probably just stupid, but in your post I can't figure out who was replying to and quoting whom.

Who wrote, "Hey juliann this is for you!" . . . ?

Who said, "Those who live by the sword die by the sword, sweets. If you want to take on my attorneys, be my f***ing guest." . . . ? Also, to whom was he or she responding when he or she stated that?

In addition, who said, "So if the tables were turned they would just sue you. But its ok cause they are not an apologist nor claimed to be, just an active member of the church." . . . ? And in that statement, who is "you," and who is "they?"

Lastly, are DanG and Nemesis the same person?

Sorry to be a pain, but I'm being honest when I tell you that I can't figure it out.

Strange. I understood her perfectly.

[_Yoda]

Liz:

I'm probably just stupid, but in your post I can't figure out who was replying to and quoting whom.

Who wrote, "Hey juliann this is for you!" . . . ?

Nemesis wrote, "Hey Juliann this is for you!" and then quoted me.

Who said, "Those who live by the sword die by the sword, sweets. If you want to take on my attorneys, be my f***ing guest." . . . ? Also, to whom was he or she responding when he or she stated that?

I did. I was responding to Juliann, who was on her high horse, stating that she would publish my porn erotica for Church members to see.

In addition, who said, "So if the tables were turned they would just sue you. But its ok cause they are not an apologist nor claimed to be, just an active member of the church." . . . ? And in that statement, who is "you," and who is "they?"

Nemesis a.k.a. Dan G said the above. "They" was in reference to me. "You" was in reference to Juliann.

Lastly, are DanG and Nemesis the same person?

Yes.

Sorry to be a pain, but I'm being honest when I tell you that I can't figure it out.

It's OK. I probably should have used the quote feature, but was too lazy when I copy/pasted it over. I thought it was pretty clear the way things were spaced out.

Does it make sense now?

Let me see if I can adjust the original post.

[_Yoda]

Shades--

I adjusted it. Does this make more sense?

viewtopic.php?p=463006#p463006

[_Dr. Shades]

YES! I get it now (thanks to your explanations). I had no idea what Juliann had threatened you with, so the "take on my attorneys" thing seemed like it came from out of left field.

Harmony: I'm 100% serious about having not understood it until Liz explained it.

[_moksha]

We are a litigious and prophetic people.

I still have no idea what this is about. Is it based on some MAD thread, or have the spirits of Dan G and Juliann been channeled through new server updates?

Feuds based on having worn the same shades of leather straps at a MAD rave party, should not be of a long lasting variety. Best to tie both B23 and Nehor up and take turns with the whip.