Can we ban joseph, Loran, and Simon?

[_Droopy]

Simon, quit being an idiot.

Have you just outed Kish as a purveyor of slander before he's had a change to do so himself? At least let Kish trip over his own shoelaces. He's a big boy.

[_Chap]

What's more stunning is you can't point out what you believe to be dishonesty.

Simon, I have so many times now that it is entirely unnecessary. Most people here know what I am talking about. I am doing you a favor by not proving the fact yet again. It gives you a little more breathing space, so to speak.

So, your dishonesty about your dishonesty really is stunning, and abundantly proves my point.

Translation: Uhh, well...there was...you know, that time when...uh...uh...oh yeah, that time you, uh...who do you think you are asking me for evidence? Did MsJack need evidence for her 'c' word charge? Of course not. Don't you know how things work around here?

Oh, you must have missed this while you were dodging the sharks:

The Simon Belmont terminological inexactitude thread, that he attempted (six months later) to explain away by a 'typo'.

Stak summed up the general reaction at that time, and ever since then:

And, by the way, as a techie, I have your IP address, along with everyone else's here. I could easily use it to determine who each of you are in real life -- but will I? No. Because I am honorable and would never stoop to the level you bring yourself to.

Liar.

[_Droopy]

Simon, you complete and utter moron,

Soon, I may have to do a thread for Kish similar to my Psychological Analysis of Kevin Graham's Posts thread, so we can begin keeping tabs on how many times he uses the terms "stupid," "moron," and his favorite four letter groin kicks in lieu of substantive discourse.

[_Buffalo]

buffalo wrote: "Every forum on the internet uses copyrighted images all the time. Including MAD."
****************************

Some of them even get permission to use the images.

So why are so many trying the old criminal cry 'everyone does it'?

The worst part here is that the site was shut down by someone who probably does not even have a legal copyright complaint.

That does not excuse theft on the part of others.

Because literally everyone does it. Who cares?

[_Droopy]

Oh, you must have missed this while you were dodging the sharks:

The Simon Belmont terminological inexactitude thread, that he attempted (six months later) to explain away by a 'typo'.

After looking at some of that thread, it appears to be just the same MDB posse goin' to a lynchin'. Nothing to see here. Scratch, for one example, has pursued me and others here over typo's or unclear or poorly phrased sentences (usually as a derailing tactic) on many occasion.

The real problem here, Chap, is that you guys think you're all very clever, very smooth, and very smart, and that all your techniques and tactics of character assassination and blackballing (which tells an acute observer a great deal about the void of intellectual substance found within so much of the anti-Mormon and ex-Mormon critical world) have any other affect then to...make you look like character assassins and yellow polemicists.

Even the few among you who really do have some advanced education and intellectual heft can't break out of this mold and into the arena of ideas with serious apologists.

When are you folks going to take your training wheels off and engage us apologists in serious, civil, rational discussion of our differences, and cut out the High School in-group giggling and finger pointing?

[_Kishkumen]

"Are you now, or have you ever been an apologist?"

Droopy, don't project your ideological fantasies onto me.

[_Doctor Scratch]

Hey, Droopy:

How did it feel to get kicked off of The Foyer? Were you angry?

[_Droopy]

"Are you now, or have you ever been an apologist?"

Droopy, don't project your ideological fantasies onto me.

I'm not projecting mine, just reflecting PP's intellectual Stalinism, which I found in full bloom at the Further Light and Knowledge board, a forum that makes the terms "Trailerpark" and "cesspool" seem like terms of endearment.

[_schreech]

When are you folks going to take your training wheels off and engage us apologists in serious, civil, rational discussion of our differences, and cut out the the High School in-group giggling and finger pointing?

lol...are now calling yourself an "apologist"? For what organization? The teabaggers? I have yet to see you actually engage in Mormon apologetics (I don't know a single Mormon that would support any of your looney political nonsense so who are you defending?).......didn't you get kicked off the main LDS apologetic forum?

[_Kishkumen]

I'm not projecting mine, just reflecting PP's intellectual Stalinism, which I found in full bloom at the Further Light and Knowledge board, a forum that makes the terms "Trailerpark" and "cesspool" seem like terms of endearment.

Well, you were responding to me, not PP. And that board punted your butt for violating the etiquette of their board. It was fun to watch. At the same time, I would not advocate punting you from this board for your usual Droopy behavior. You may irritate me to no end, but I like you in an odd way. I would really miss you if I didn't see you around.