Blixa wrote:
My car must be so confused right now...
Then have a priesthood holder anoint it with some 10-30w.
by the way, is it of the tribe of Detroit?
Blixa wrote:
My car must be so confused right now...
Trouble is, you will have to prove money damages and you have to prove that something they said isn't true. I can only think of one person who would have a slam dunk lawsuit for libel right now because not everything that was published was true and the accuser actually published the damage she caused....either very brave or very stupid.
Just to be clear, I didn't mean "imagination" as in "making stuff up out of thin air". I meant it as "thinking creatively to see things in a new way".
For example, my theory of the Kinderhook Plates sprang from my imagination, but it is fully supported by the data; it isn't something I "made up" but instead it is a creative way of reinterpreting something that might not be faith promoting to make it more aligned with a faithful view of Church history.
Granted, my theory can be easily dismissed because of the tenuous nature and timing of Joseph's involvement with the plates. But had he actually produced a "Book of Ham" from the plates (with the subsequent canonization of said book), I can guarantee you my theory would be very popular and have it's own entry on the FairWiki.
Anytime someone thinks of a new explanation or theory, it's a good use of imagination, and the best apologetic arguments can start out this way. Obviously, the worst ones too.
MsJack wrote:krose wrote: ... Are manual and oral forms of stimulation (as practiced by lesbians) really considered fornication?LDS Guy 1986 wrote:Yes, regardless if they are performed by a same sex or opposite sex couple they are fornication. The only sexual act that is not fornication is vaginal intercourse between a man and a women who are married to each other.
This is a travesty.
LDS Guy 1986 left out the part about keeping your garments on during sex.
They can't, [respond] we have banned 90% of them. We are working on 100% but well you know it takes time and no one is perfect.
Nemesis
There is an inference here that is glaring. I laid it out very plainly. The reasons the lawyer wants a different venue is racial, religious, and inferred bigotry. To argue otherwise is to plug your ears and close your eyes.
I have kept silent all weekend to see where things went and give Shades time to think things over and perhaps come up with a good plan to change his board from a staging platform for attackings members of this board to a board that discusses issues. Instead he has used the time to deflect blame onto me making his boards assault on Juliann and this "Board War" my creation. I wish to remind him that all this drama has been created by posters of his board and himself promoting such behavior. Even in Liz's attempt at reconciliation we see how she places blame on us stating they will stop attacking us if we stop attacking them. We have never started nor would I let this board be used to attack them. I will give Liz a lot of credit at the attempt which has been drowned out by the minority once again. If she can continue to try to initiate change there I think it will be a huge benefit to the board and allow for some real reconciliation and perhaps healing will begin. However we will no longer sit quiet while Shade's board continues to be irresponsible and allows attacks on people that have no involvement with their board.
I will continue to hold Shades publicly accountable for any more attacks his board hosts on the posters or administration of this board and will continue documenting their antics. If he doesn't like that nor want be held personally accountable then he can make a very simple change that will improve his board and keep real people from being the targets of his participants. It is my hope they will initiate such change and that this will be my last post on the matter.
Nemesis
Robert F. Smith wrote: Yokels have indeed investigated the non-supernatural aspects of the Book of Mormon and found them contradicting everything they know about the history of the Americas, but only because they known next to nothing about the history of the Americas.
Most actual scholars or scientists (with advanced degrees and extensive experience in their fields) who have investigated the Book of Mormon have found a vast array of evidence confirming the naturalistic claims (explicit and implicit) made therein -- both in an Old World and New World context.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.