Once again I've missed the fun...

[_Polygamy-Porter]

Red, I find it telling that Pah would respond to your inquiry.

If non of it were true he would have left it alone and not defiled your screen name.

Own up to it Pah, did you splash reading Bro Berman's erotica?

[_moksha]

... that this sty regularly spawns ...

Regards,
Pahoran

Just because those elsewhere prefer to eat from the same feedlot in unison, does not mean that they do not enjoy a good roll in the mud.

[_Bond James Bond]

Are you all guilty collectively?
Yes.

No.

[_Chap]

The crickets are chirping here. I'd really like to see the subsequent Pahoran post if someone made an allegation like the one below about a moderator on a board that he favored with his allegiance, and then did not fess up when asked to substantiate.

Checking to see if the Juliann picture is still there, I see that someone has been using the MAD-Juliann picture on meme generator to repeat the essence of Pahoran's assertion below.

Bizarre. Wonder who it is? I wonder too whether Juliann is happy about having that kind of thing written all over her image.

In the meantime, I have a question; two, actually:

Who was the MDB moderator (or "upper echelon someone" ) who offered drugs for sexual favours? And who orchestrated the cover-up?

Regards,
Pahoran

Dunno. You tell us.

Nobody has ever offered me drugs for sexual favors, on this board or in real life. I have never offered anyone drugs for sexual favors, on this board or in real life.

I have never, ever, heard any rumors that anyone did anything of the kind in association with activities on this board. I think you will get that answer from pretty well every other poster here, and it would be sincere.

So unless you are going to play the wenglund 'You all have to deny doing anything bad before I say anything' game (yawn ...), how about cutting to the chase and telling us all:


1. What exactly it is that you believe happened on this board, and when.

2. What grounds you have for thinking that such a thing occurred.

3, What relevance the alleged event has to discussions about Mormonism. We never, after all, said that the posters are perfect, to coin a phrase.

[_beastie]

You've gotta admit it Beastie, Pahoran has a point there. Last I checked, the board rules prohibit linking to in real life information of any board members and SGW has an account here.

The rules state:

Do not reveal personal or "in real life" information about any poster on this site that he or she has not explicitly revealed here. This includes avoiding mention of his/her actual first or last name, even if he or she has made it available on some other website.*

SeattleGhostWriter registered here and immediately explicitly revealed his own identity.

[_Kishkumen]

Question for clarification, Kish: Are you telling us that you actually approve of the vindictive jihad threads that this sty regularly spawns, or are you merely cheering from the sidelines because you simply haven't the vertebrae to stand up to the hagarchy?

Inquiring minds want to know!

Pahoran, if you're going to rush into a board with your sharp tongue at the ready, the least you can do is your homework. Even jogging your memory would be a decent minimum preparation. As it is, I am so tired of revisiting the same topics with apologists that I simply refuse to do so. If you have a legitimate query, just let me know.

[_beastie]

On the one hand, he claimed to have written a particular piece before he returned to the Church. On the other, he says he is still interested in writing "erotica." Granted that this may well be problematic, depending upon what's in it (contrary to the spiteful asinumptions of the herd, I haven't read any of it) the "contradiction" appears to be either manufactured or merely imagined.

LOL. This may go down as another tattoo incident.

Jack already provided a link to a piece of LDS apologia that he wrote in May 2007. He wrote the piece in question in June 2007. He asserted an interest in writing erotica on his myspace profile at the same time as he was an active LDS member.

And yet you still think it's justified to assert his erotic writing occurred when he was "one of our lot."

[_Kishkumen]

And yet you still think it's justified to assert his erotic writing occurred when he was "one of our lot."

Rule #1 of apologetics: it is only a falsehood if it supports the wrong position.

[_Buffalo]

On the one hand, he claimed to have written a particular piece before he returned to the Church. On the other, he says he is still interested in writing "erotica." Granted that this may well be problematic, depending upon what's in it (contrary to the spiteful asinumptions of the herd, I haven't read any of it) the "contradiction" appears to be either manufactured or merely imagined.

LOL. This may go down as another tattoo incident.

Jack already provided a link to a piece of LDS apologia that he wrote in May 2007. He wrote the piece in question in June 2007. He asserted an interest in writing erotica on his myspace profile at the same time as he was an active LDS member.

And yet you still think it's justified to assert his erotic writing occurred when he was "one of our lot."

Paharon is a great guy. SGW lied to him and the rest of the MAD crew in order to get them to come to his defense. Even after being disrespected like that, he's still here defending SGW. What a guy. :)

[_cafe crema]

So your filthy imagination merely speaks out the the abundance of your heart.

Regards,
Pahoran

Just as Will's filthy imagination speaks of his heart.