MAD Board Joins Meme Fight With Pics of Young Children

[_Simon Belmont]

That's because Simon has been using Facebook to gather "intel" on critics. He's posted family pictures of people before, on the various iterations of his blog. By now his history of blowing up and doing stupid things has been well established. I don't know whether he was responsible for the meme, but it wouldn't surprise me. Even if he didn't do the actual meme, I'd be willing to bet that he circulated that image amongst his TBM pals

When I saw that you had posted on this thread, my first thought was "Scratch will probably pin this on me."

I was correct.

For the record, and I know Scratch will attempt to cause more contention: I had nothing to do with this. I did not use Facebook to gather "intel" on critics. I did not see Kevin Graham's Facebook until he added me as a friend a couple of days ago. The joke about him being shirtless was just that, a joke, I had not seen his Facebook at that time. Again, I had nothing to do with this and condemn it with everything I can. It is despicable for anyone to engage in this behavior.

[_CaliforniaKid]

I see no need for the "sarcasm" note.

You don't have to be French to know the meaning of agent provocateur.

And you don't have to be American to know the meaning of "he who smelt it dealt it."

[_Chap]

A poster who has done as much to damage his own credibility as Belmont can hardly complain when people don't believe everything he says.

Belmont may have done the dirty on Kevin Graham. He may not have done. We don't know, and probably never will.

Given Belmont's record, his denial is simply not a piece of evidence deserving of any weight either way. After all, if he had done it, do you think he would admit it?

[_consiglieri]

The suggestion that this is something that Will Schryver did is almost certainly false.

Nomad?

[_consiglieri]

And you don't have to be American to know the meaning of "he who smelt it dealt it."

Americans can be so jejune.

N'est-ce pas?

All the Best!

--Consiglieri

[_consiglieri]

Again, I had nothing to do with this and condemn it with everything I can. It is despicable for anyone to engage in this behavior.

Methinks the Simon . . .

[_CaliforniaKid]

Americans can be so jejune.

N'est-ce pas?

Sometimes it takes a hammer to drive a nail.

[_Eric]

Ray sent this to me, and since Chris suggested the same thing, I thought I'd respond.

Kevin I have been thinking, how could Eric known[sic] about your meme? Lets[sic] think about this[sic] your meme didn't have your name in it, who would have thought to do a search for apostate bliss? If I were you I would see if he is a Facebook friend of yours and consider removing him. You were the only one that objected to his approval of the juliann meme and I can bet if shades[sic] looks at the poll it will be his moniker that comes up as the only vote out of sync with the rest of the group. Once again sorry they targeted you for taking a stand for something wrong. Hope this gets you one step closer to finding out who is responsible.

First of all, I condemned the indecent captioned memes before DanG's illiterate declaration of war:

June 7 2011: http://www.mormondiscussions.com/phpBB3 ... 01#p464201

Second of all, I only started this thread because Kevin asked me to mention the meme to the MAD board and document their bad behavior. I didn't search for apostate bliss on that site. I saw Kevin's thread about deleting captions, went to the site, and happened to see it on the front page. I recognized Kevin immediately and notified him. He thanked me and asked that I post about it. I wouldn't have if he hadn't asked me to.

I openly admit that I enjoyed the Devilish Rogue memes, although I made none.

If DanG wants to single me out by my full name on his silly little message board, I'd appreciate it if he took the time to write coherently.

[_Kevin Graham]

eric, i just started a thread discussing this

[_beastie]

If DanG wants to single me out by my full name on his silly little message board, I'd appreciate it if he took the time to write coherently.

Wouldn't we all.