Temple Movie: New John?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Temple Movie: New John?

Post by _harmony »

There appears to be no explanation for this action. Which, of course, is not surprising. When was the last time the Brethren explained any actions?
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Runtu
_Emeritus
Posts: 16721
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 5:06 am

Re: Temple Movie: New John?

Post by _Runtu »

I've heard that Fred (can't remember his last name), who played John and was on "Center Street" on BYUTV, came out as gay. But I can't confirm that.
Runtu's Rincón

If you just talk, I find that your mouth comes out with stuff. -- Karl Pilkington
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Temple Movie: New John?

Post by _harmony »

Runtu wrote:I've heard that Fred (can't remember his last name), who played John and was on "Center Street" on BYUTV, came out as gay. But I can't confirm that.


Even if that is true (and I can't confirm because I know nothing about Fred), being gay isn't an offense, in and of itself. Or has that changed? ThaT just being gay gets a person erased now?
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Mad Viking
_Emeritus
Posts: 566
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:27 pm

Re: Temple Movie: New John?

Post by _Mad Viking »

"Sire, I had no need of that hypothesis" - Laplace
_just me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9070
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:46 pm

Re: Temple Movie: New John?

Post by _just me »

Mad Viking wrote:http://www.affirmation.org/news/2011_008.shtml


Thanks for the linky.
~Those who benefit from the status quo always attribute inequities to the choices of the underdog.~Ann Crittenden
~The Goddess is not separate from the world-She is the world and all things in it.~
_Joseph
_Emeritus
Posts: 3517
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 11:00 pm

Re: Temple Movie: New John?

Post by _Joseph »

A new John?

Next they will be saying it is because Eve is a hooker?
"This is how INGORNAT these fools are!" - darricktevenson

Bow your head and mutter, what in hell am I doing here?

infaymos wrote: "Peterson is the defacto king ping of the Mormon Apologetic world."
_cinepro
_Emeritus
Posts: 4502
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:15 pm

Re: Temple Movie: New John?

Post by _cinepro »

Mad Viking wrote:http://www.affirmation.org/news/2011_008.shtml


Well, I guess it's public now.

I was in Fred's ward years ago, and he's one of the nicest, most sincere Church members I have ever met. It really tore me up when he "came out" to his friends and shared how much he had struggled with his homosexuality. In the Temple movie, it looks like they only altered the scenes where he was easily identifiable, so it's still him in the long-shots.

He had some interesting stories about filming the Temple movie. Apparently they went way out onto the Church's property in Wyoming, but the anti-Mormons in a helicopter were still able to find them and try to disrupt (or see) what was going on.

Fred was also the "We've gotta go back" elder in the Church's "Labor of Love" video. I wonder if they'll edit that too...?

(Go to 9:11 in this video. For some reason it was much easier to find in Spanish)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KT7FFkh1B2w
Post Reply