Boundaries?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Lucretia MacEvil
_Emeritus
Posts: 1558
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 7:01 am

Re: Boundaries?

Post by _Lucretia MacEvil »

I thought you were going to ask about personal boundaries. Mormons can be a little lacking in those.
The person who is certain and who claims divine warrant for his certainty belongs now to the infancy of our species. Christopher Hitchens

Faith does not give you the answers, it just stops you asking the questions. Frater
_cafe crema
_Emeritus
Posts: 2042
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 5:07 am

Re: Boundaries?

Post by _cafe crema »

The Nehor wrote: Multiple congregations share a building and setting up boundaries prevents bleed-over due to a desire to tailor meeting times to your preferences.

I don't see the problem with tailoring meeting times to work with ones family schedule, it is a good thing to be able to do things with your family and still attend church. Flexibility in "meeting times" has worked in many situations in our life but it's been a particular boon when any of our children has been sick. My husband and I have been able to tag team child care and church in a relaxed fashion, strangely the days with sick kids where we attended at different times were more calm than those where we all went together. I've actually been mulling this over lately as my oldest seems to be sliding into that stay awake late/sleep late teenage thing, thinking that it might work best to bust up family attendance into the "early bird" and the "slug a bed" groups. As a kid I spent the summer at my grandparents lake house along with all my cousins and on Sunday someone was going to church from 6am till noon, I have fond memories of all the "time slots".
_ludwigm
_Emeritus
Posts: 10158
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:07 am

Re: Boundaries?

Post by _ludwigm »

bcspace wrote:.... "parish hopping" or shopping around for wards you like without moving ...

Are these speshul features of the onlytrueone?

I may be a stupid european. I know no such thing in any churches here around us.
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: Boundaries?

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

The Nehor wrote:
The sympathetic answer is that it makes it easier for the Church to organize everything and distribute resources, and the more cynical answer is that it allows the Church to control things more thoroughly and to more accurately keep tabs on all the members.


The actual answer is that it just plain makes sense. Multiple congregations share a building and setting up boundaries prevents bleed-over due to a desire to tailor meeting times to your preferences. It also simplifies Church programs like Home Teaching where Sister Elijah from out of town doesn't attend a far-away ward because the bishop is her second cousin and make the Home Teachers travel farther then they would otherwise need to. It consolidates help as a ward service project or help moving is more likely close by.


What you're describing here is a needless and ridiculous level of control being placed on members' lives within the Church.

And since you seem to disagree with my above point about boundaries being "strictly enforced"... Why don't you describe the reasons why you abide by the boundaries?
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_gramps
_Emeritus
Posts: 2485
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:43 pm

Re: Boundaries?

Post by _gramps »

My most special memories of church attendance were holding sacrament meeting at The Pines, the family ranch on the Smith and Morehouse. Across the river from the cabin, in a beautiful grove of pines, the other family members from cabins nearby would all come together with us to hold sacrament meeting each Sunday morning.

Now, that was living. We had to stop when correlation took hold and we were told (read: commanded) we had to attend the Oakley ward. The kids stopped going and went fishing or horseback riding instead. Even half the adults, my aunts and uncles, stayed at the cabin, rather than dress up to go down to Oakley.

Correlation: the death of the Church, as I see it.
I detest my loose style and my libertine sentiments. I thank God, who has removed from my eyes the veil...
Adrian Beverland
_Joseph
_Emeritus
Posts: 3517
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 11:00 pm

Re: Boundaries?

Post by _Joseph »

You may find more choosing to attend a different ward/congregation during football season when their ward meeting schedule conflicts with the time their favorite football team is playing on TV. This was especially troublesome in a few West Jordan wards we were in while Steve Young was playing for the San Francisco 49ers.

It is also a way to attend your meetings but not have any callings. Can be troublesome though when it comes time to get interviewed for a Temple Recommend.
"This is how INGORNAT these fools are!" - darricktevenson

Bow your head and mutter, what in hell am I doing here?

infaymos wrote: "Peterson is the defacto king ping of the Mormon Apologetic world."
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: Boundaries?

Post by _The Nehor »

Doctor Scratch wrote:What you're describing here is a needless and ridiculous level of control being placed on members' lives within the Church.


Nope.

And since you seem to disagree with my above point about boundaries being "strictly enforced"... Why don't you describe the reasons why you abide by the boundaries?


Because if I 'go to' the 'wrong ward' the 'Gestapo' shows up and 'escorts' me to my 'proper ward'.

I go to the ward I'm in because those are my neighbors, the ones I should know and the ones I should interact with the most. I do my home teaching there, I help the missionaries there, etc.

It's not rocket science Scratch. I realize you've probably wanted to switch wards a few times to find people more sympathetic to your viewpoints. Let me assure you; the problem is that they've met you and that won't change no matter what ward you go to.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: Boundaries?

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

The Nehor wrote:
Doctor Scratch wrote:What you're describing here is a needless and ridiculous level of control being placed on members' lives within the Church.


Nope.


Sure it is. As I noted above, there have been times when wards were split up according to completely arbitrary geographical boundaries. And what real purpose does this serve? If a few people want to attend the "other" ward because they have friends there, what's the problem?

And since you seem to disagree with my above point about boundaries being "strictly enforced"... Why don't you describe the reasons why you abide by the boundaries?


Because if I 'go to' the 'wrong ward' the 'Gestapo' shows up and 'escorts' me to my 'proper ward'.

I go to the ward I'm in because those are my neighbors, the ones I should know and the ones I should interact with the most. I do my home teaching there, I help the missionaries there, etc.


If the Church decided to split up your ward, what would you do? Would you attend the ward that still contained the largest portion of your neighbors & etc., or would you go where the Church told you to go? Similarly, if you could drive twenty minutes each Sunday to attend a ward with your family, friends, and so on, would you do it? Or would you attend the ward that was assigned to you?
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Re: Boundaries?

Post by _asbestosman »

The Nehor wrote:It's not rocket science Scratch. I realize you've probably wanted to switch wards a few times to find people more sympathetic to your viewpoints. Let me assure you; the problem is that they've met you and that won't change no matter what ward you go to.

I'm not sure that's true at all Nehor. I imagine plenty of NOMinal members who hang out here would love to have their own ward--the MDB 1st ward. Harmony could be the bishop with Liz as first counselor and Scratch as second counselor.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_Quasimodo
_Emeritus
Posts: 11784
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:11 am

Re: Boundaries?

Post by _Quasimodo »

Just as a contrast, when I lived in the South East US, my neighbor was a Baptist Minister. His wife was a Methodist. They each attended their own separate churches. No one in the community (other than me) thought it was strange. They were an elderly couple and had been living this way since they were young.
This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.

"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
Post Reply