Six Hundred and Ninety-Nine
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 2690
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:21 pm
Re: Six Hundred and Ninety-Nine
Even worse about the closing of most threads is that in some cases posters/mods are allowed to cast their parting shot after the thread has been closed down. The most blatant case of this is the currently pinned thread by Nemesis where he's (selectively) live blogging this board's response while the thread is closed.
Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded.-charity 3/7/07
MASH quotes
I peeked in the back [of the Bible] Frank, the Devil did it.
I avoid church religiously.
This isn't one of my sermons, I expect you to listen.
MASH quotes
I peeked in the back [of the Bible] Frank, the Devil did it.
I avoid church religiously.
This isn't one of my sermons, I expect you to listen.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 7625
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 1:58 am
Re: Six Hundred and Ninety-Nine
Morning B23-Bingo!,
Far worse then simply "live blogging this board's response while the thread is closed", in my opinion.
The "senior administrator" at MDDB locked that thread (silencing any and all voices) and then posted 17 more posts (carrying on a discussion with himself) in blatant attempt to cast judgement upon, offer sole opinions of, and create an enviornment to, be the one and only human being worthy enough to continue to post in that thread. (On many levels, that strikes me as completely wrong).
It is my firm opinion that this is an enormous abuse of power, clearly vindictive at the roots, very irresponsible, and certainly adds fuel to keep the fire raging (by design in my opinion).
I would have liked to, without question, offer this very post directly to the entire MDDB community (as well as the powers there), but I have lost my privilege to do so.
Peace,
Ceeboo
B23 wrote:Even worse about the closing of most threads is that in some cases posters/mods are allowed to cast their parting shot after the thread has been closed down. The most blatant case of this is the currently pinned thread by Nemesis where he's (selectively) live blogging this board's response while the thread is closed.
Far worse then simply "live blogging this board's response while the thread is closed", in my opinion.
The "senior administrator" at MDDB locked that thread (silencing any and all voices) and then posted 17 more posts (carrying on a discussion with himself) in blatant attempt to cast judgement upon, offer sole opinions of, and create an enviornment to, be the one and only human being worthy enough to continue to post in that thread. (On many levels, that strikes me as completely wrong).
It is my firm opinion that this is an enormous abuse of power, clearly vindictive at the roots, very irresponsible, and certainly adds fuel to keep the fire raging (by design in my opinion).
I would have liked to, without question, offer this very post directly to the entire MDDB community (as well as the powers there), but I have lost my privilege to do so.
Peace,
Ceeboo
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 6186
- Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 10:47 pm
Re: Six Hundred and Ninety-Nine
Yahoo Bot wrote:
Look at poor Consigleri, obviously a smart fellow, who kept his faithless sarcasm in tow for a long, long time before being kicked off for something mean-spirited.
The post that got me banned was two sentences under a thread I created titled, "Putting a Rumor to Rest," and consisting of the following:
I have heard a rumor that the Maxwell Institute is pulling the plug on publishing Will Schryver's Book of Abraham research.
Is there any truth to this?
That's it. But you wouldn't know this by looking at the MDD board.
Because they deleted it when they banned me.
Just for the record.
All the Best!
--Consiglieri
You prove yourself of the devil and anti-mormon every word you utter, because only the devil perverts facts to make their case.--ldsfaqs (6-24-13)
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 12064
- Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm
Re: Six Hundred and Ninety-Nine
I've never been to a board where so many threads are locked - even on some of the forums where I thought the moderation was heavy handed, you never saw anything like 78% thread closure.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 12064
- Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm
Re: Four Hundred and Two
bcspace wrote:
I think LDS apologetics can handle it just fine. Mormon Dialogue is only a small part in a big pond though it might be one of the larger amalgamations. And not everyone there is afraid of open and honest discussion but like the company at least.
Head to head, LDS apologetics wins every encounter. The only reason why it might look to be flailing sometimes is because it is heavily outnumbered.
At first I thought this was satire, and then I saw your moniker. :D
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 12064
- Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm
Re: Six Hundred and Ninety-Nine
B23 wrote:Even worse about the closing of most threads is that in some cases posters/mods are allowed to cast their parting shot after the thread has been closed down. The most blatant case of this is the currently pinned thread by Nemesis where he's (selectively) live blogging this board's response while the thread is closed.
It looks like he finally took that down.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 6215
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm
Re: Six Hundred and Ninety-Nine
Kevin Graham wrote:Every thread I counted as "closed" was started between now and January, so a six month window. I think you're referring to stuff in the archives, which I didn't include.
Nemesis also validated my comment. He says that threads are closed after 30 days of inactivity--that's room enough for many threads in 6 months.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 4502
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:15 pm
Re: Six Hundred and Ninety-Nine
As a fairly active participant over there, I'll just say that I haven't noticed too many interesting or worthwhile threads getting locked.
From what I can tell, it's usually a mercy kill for threads that have devolved into right-wing political diatribes or grade-school insult throwing. Or for threads that have simply run their course (i.e. the question has been answered).
I can't think of too many threads that were shut down because the apologists were having their hats handed to them. And it happens all the time, so it would be pretty noticeable. ;)
From what I can tell, it's usually a mercy kill for threads that have devolved into right-wing political diatribes or grade-school insult throwing. Or for threads that have simply run their course (i.e. the question has been answered).
I can't think of too many threads that were shut down because the apologists were having their hats handed to them. And it happens all the time, so it would be pretty noticeable. ;)
Re: Six Hundred and Ninety-Nine
Buffalo wrote:B23 wrote:Even worse about the closing of most threads is that in some cases posters/mods are allowed to cast their parting shot after the thread has been closed down. The most blatant case of this is the currently pinned thread by Nemesis where he's (selectively) live blogging this board's response while the thread is closed.
It looks like he finally took that down.
No, he didn't take it down. He merely moved it to another section:
http://www.mormondialogue.org/topic/545 ... ge__st__80
Take note that he also blatantly posted Shades' in real life name...and has left it, even after Shades requested it be removed.