LOL. Proof positive you've never even bothered to read the link I've repeatedly provided for you - in fact, I've provided this link EACH TIME you accuse me of lying about your sexual innuendos.
They're not innuendos. They were snarky and ad hominem references to her own posting style and history. Bad form? Yes. Sexual innuendo? Here's the defininition of "innuendo:
an oblique allusion : hint, insinuation; especially : a veiled or equivocal reflection on character or reputation b : the use of such allusions <resorting to innuendo Looking at all of my comments on this old thread, I see no innuendo whatever. I do see strongly worded, snarky digs aimed at her, but no innuendo. My words here appear to be pretty straight forward.
Moniker spoke incessantly and in detail regarding sexual themes on various posts at that time, including forms of sexual practice. It was, like Paul Osborne, a consistent theme with her. Her claim that I called her a "stupid slut" is one of her own lies, quite in the ballpark with Jack and Scratch, and present company.
The hef remarks seem very odd (and I was probably drunk of my butt when I did this stuff), but they too, are not "innuendos" but barbs aimed at her for her extreme libertine social views, which were well known at the time and upon which we argued heatedly.
I apologized to her for the quip about her past as a stripper and dancing for drooling construction workers.
The "horny froth" comment was, again, not an innuendo, but a pointed reference, as I used to often do with Paul, to her own sex preoccupied liberal mind.
The quip about sex in the derriere was, again, not an innuendo but a pointed reference to her continual sexual banter on that and other similar subjects.
The statement about the strip clubs being "top loaded" with certain kinds of men doesn't appear to make your case at all, so I"m not sure why its there. Its nothing but an observation.
The statement about lefties and cultural libertines being drawn to threads about sex and sexual themes is, again, not remotely an innuendo, nor was it aimed at Moniker personally, but at her, Some Schmo, harmony (with her obsessive preoccupation with the sex life of Joseph Smith) and Coffecat, who had distinguished herself in this forum at that time as a big fan of pornography.
The fact that this was one of another, and perhaps more homosexual marriage threads, is indicative of both the sparks flying and the heat generated by the debate.
You lose, Beastie, and in so doing have exposed yourself, yet again, as fundamentally reptilian in nature.
In all frankness, I would absolutely not do that song again. In all further frankness, I was drinking myself into oblivion almost on a nightly basis back in 2008, and some of this, in all likelihood, represents that fact.
You may need to check out what psychological issues you have that you repeatedly make remarks that are rude and demeaning to women (and men) on this website.
Repeatedly? I count five, perhaps six instances here, since this board's inception.
Crawl on your belly, beastie, but crawl away from me.