Re: Response to ( annilid worm reference deleted) Buffalo.

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Re: Response to ( annilid worm reference deleted) Buffalo.

Post by _beastie »

Molok wrote:What exactly is so wrong about making non flirtacious "sexualized insults" to someone who is widely known for speaking openly and frankly about sexual topics? Do any of ou seriously think Paul O, for example, would give a good goddamn if someone made "sexualized insults" to him? Of course not. The idea is laughable.

I never knew Moniker, so if I have any of these details wrong, please correct me. She apparently talked about working as a stripper, anal sex, and other sexual topics regularly (incidentally, isn't this also the rather unhinged person who was banned from here some time ago?) And Droopy made a song parody about here, essentially labelled her a slut, and worst of all, referred to her as Hef. How can you live with yourself Droopy?


She didn't talk about being a stripper in the context of being proud of it. It was part of her victimized past, which included other tragic events.

Yes, she talked about human sexuality, although I'm not sure "regularly" would be accurate. Does that make her a slut?

If so, perhaps it's time for female posters to don the figurative burqa. I'm sure it would make droopy much more comfortable, how about you? Neutered barbie dolls, that's the ticket.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... rsary.html
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Re: Response to ( annilid worm reference deleted) Buffalo.

Post by _beastie »

beastie wrote:
Molok wrote:What exactly is so wrong about making non flirtacious "sexualized insults" to someone who is widely known for speaking openly and frankly about sexual topics? Do any of ou seriously think Paul O, for example, would give a good goddamn if someone made "sexualized insults" to him? Of course not. The idea is laughable.

I never knew Moniker, so if I have any of these details wrong, please correct me. She apparently talked about working as a stripper, anal sex, and other sexual topics regularly (incidentally, isn't this also the rather unhinged person who was banned from here some time ago?) And Droopy made a song parody about here, essentially labelled her a slut, and worst of all, referred to her as Hef. How can you live with yourself Droopy?


She didn't talk about being a stripper in the context of being proud of it. It was part of her victimized past, which included other tragic events.

Yes, she talked about human sexuality, although I'm not sure "regularly" would be accurate. Does that make her a slut?

And does the fact that she may have had some emotional stability issues make her an appropriate target?

If so, perhaps it's time for female posters to don the figurative burqa. I'm sure it would make droopy much more comfortable, how about you? Neutered barbie dolls, that's the ticket.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... rsary.html
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Re: Response to ( annilid worm reference deleted) Buffalo.

Post by _beastie »

by the way, I want to point out that I'm not the one who keeps bringing this up. I bring it up only to defend myself against droopy's charge that I'm lying about his past history of sexualized insults.

Whether or not one thinks his sexualized insults were justified or problematic is, I suppose, another matter. But there is no doubt that droopy did engage in this behavior, so he ought to stop calling me a liar.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_Molok
_Emeritus
Posts: 1832
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 4:31 am

Re: Response to ( annilid worm reference deleted) Buffalo.

Post by _Molok »

Personally Beastie, I couldn't care less about what anyone talks about on this board. Feel free to talk about anything in as graphic detail as you wish, I won't bat an eye. My point was, that people who discuss issues like sex, or politics, in an environment where they know there are going to be others who vehemently disagree, possibly even be offended by their remarks, those people shouldn't be too surprised when people turn their remarks on them.
_Molok
_Emeritus
Posts: 1832
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 4:31 am

Re: Response to ( annilid worm reference deleted) Buffalo.

Post by _Molok »

Oh, and Beastie, what other posters has Droopy sexually insulted??
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Re: Response to ( annilid worm reference deleted) Buffalo.

Post by _beastie »

Molok wrote:Personally Beastie, I couldn't care less about what anyone talks about on this board. Feel free to talk about anything in as graphic detail as you wish, I won't bat an eye. My point was, that people who discuss issues like sex, or politics, in an environment where they know there are going to be others who vehemently disagree, possibly even be offended by their remarks, those people shouldn't be too surprised when people turn their remarks on them.


As I said, whether or not droopy's remarks were justified or, as he put it, in "bad form" is a matter of subjective opinion.

But the fact that he made sexualized insults is not a matter of opinion. So he ought not to call me a liar.

He also insulted me in a sexualized way, although he vehemently denied that was his intent.

Some are bad boys, play with Paul's toys
Get ready for a long grind
Might have to get some moonshine
Some are bad girls, Beastie's swine pearls


http://mormondiscussions.com/phpBB3/vie ... 26#p331226

Droopy has never been able to admit that it was quite reasonable to interpret this in a sexual manner. However, it was clear to other posters, including Paul who, of course, made his own sexual riff from it. He had the good manners to edit my name out of it when requested, however, without engaging in endless arguments about whether or not it was a sexual innuendo. You can see that occur later on the thread I linked.

I'm not saying droopy has continued this particular style of insulting. I'm just saying that I'm not lying when I said he had a history of it. He has repeatedly brought this up in the recent past in order to call me a liar.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Re: Response to ( annilid worm reference deleted) Buffalo.

Post by _beastie »

Here's another one of his songs, about the posters on this site. It included a "women's chorus":

ALL
There's no exmos like low exmos like no exmos I know

MEN'S CHORUS:
Everything about it is revealing

WOMEN'S CHORUS:
Everything Hugh Hefner would allow

(later)

MEN'S CHORUS:
Let's go now where the lowbrow buy and sell

WOMEN'S CHORUS:
A place where exmos like to kiss and tell


http://mormondiscussions.com/phpBB3/vie ... 12#p329512

Everything Hugh Hefner would allow? Kiss and tell?

Just what is Droopy insinuating about the female posters on this site? Care to guess?

Again, droopy appears to have stopped this particular style of insult. But I'm not lying when I said he had a history of it.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Re: Response to ( annilid worm reference deleted) Buffalo.

Post by _beastie »

On the thread I linked earlier wherein Moniker listed all of his sexualized insults toward her, droopy apologized thusly:

I'm not insulting anyone in this manner anymore, or doing songs, and I apologized for it and that's that. Yet, if I think someone's mind has been destroyed, by their public school education, the mainstream media, or simply by not taking very much care for its health and safety, I'm going to say so. I don't mean r******* or of low intelligence, I mean destroyed--corrupted.

I'm quite sorry for all those posts, and it will not be repeated again.


viewtopic.php?p=158102#p158102

So why is he calling me a liar still?

And, of course, there's this one I already quoted

Let's change the focus of this thread, shall we (say don't you notice its always the same lefties and cultural libertines who are drawn to threads about sex and masturbation. Beastie, Moniker, Schmo, B&L, Harmony (oh, and Coffecat, she really liked porn...).

Drag 20 dollars through a trailer park and who knows what you'll find...


This is clearly an innuendo that the posters he named, which did include one male for a change, are like prostitutes.

Of course, he wrote his little song about me after this apology. So I suppose it isn't a mystery that, despite this apology, he now calls me a liar for saying he had a history of sexulized insults toward female posters.

Now let me go find an appropriate burqa. Heaven knows no female poster better discuss human sexuality, or she is inviting herself to be compared to a prostitute.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_Molok
_Emeritus
Posts: 1832
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 4:31 am

Re: Response to ( annilid worm reference deleted) Buffalo.

Post by _Molok »


Now let me go find an appropriate burqa. Heaven knows no female poster better discuss human sexuality, or she is inviting herself to be compared to a prostitute.

Oh for God's sakes, get off your cross.
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Re: Response to ( annilid worm reference deleted) Buffalo.

Post by _beastie »

Molok wrote:Oh for God's sakes, get off your cross.


Well, at least you didn't tell me to get off my stripper pole.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
Post Reply