Doctor Scratch wrote:That's not true, Ray. I told you some pretty personal things, and you went and blabbed to other people about it.
And you know this, how?
Because the person you blabbed to told me so in chat. Are you denying that you went and did that, Ray?
Do you and the Administrator of this board have a "thing going", or what? Shades knows who you are, and has the temerity to write something like This, while he let's you totally try to destroy Daniel Peterson's character and reputation.
You're going to have to take that up with Dr. Shades, Ray. I have no control over this board.
He's concerned about your "reputation", not Daniel Peterson's. He's quibbling here about someone using "Uncle Scratch" as being "disrespectful" - while you slander Daniel Peterson without mercy.
I've done nothing of the sort. Dan Peterson has been making his own bed for the past 25+ years. I'll I've done is call a bit more attention to his actions.
Doctor Scratch wrote:Nothing I've said about DCP is false.
Dr. Peterson has already demonstrated this numerous times. So I'll leave you to your blog and your remaining two supporters.
I disagree.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
RayAgostini wrote:Dr. Peterson has already demonstrated this numerous times.
True. Here, for example and beyond any dispute, on this very thread:
Doctor Scratch wrote:And there's one final point, which occurred to me as I observed your lone comment on Mercury's recent thread. Do you remember what you said? Your lone comment was a defense of Simon Belmont's attempt to engage in Mopologetics and make light of Mercury's situation.
That is a flagrant and easily demonstrated falsehood, and, very probably, a malicious lie. Here is my entire post on that thread:
Daniel Peterson in Earlier Post wrote:
Doctor Scratch in Earlier Post wrote:Am I alone in finding it appalling that Simon Belmont would try to exploit this situation for apologetic purposes?
Don't compound the problem by seeking to exploit it against apologetics.
Just stay out of it. I'm going to.
I'm honestly undecided whether you're so consumed with hatred for me that you sincerely believe such obvious falsehoods, or whether your urge to defame me is so intense that you've simply decided to brazenly lie about what I say and do.
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:I believe Mr. Peterwhatever left out "malignant tumor".
LOL. It was entirely intentional. And I'm going to continue to ignore you.
Hello Mr. Peterson,
Well, by all means continue to ignore me. ;)
He also forgot malevolent stalker. Let's get that one in there. Thank you in advance.
V/R Dr. Cameron
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.
Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
Daniel Peterson wrote:True. Here, for example and beyond any dispute, on this very thread...
[SNIP!]
Don't compound the problem by seeking to exploit it against apologetics.
Just stay out of it. I'm going to.
Dan,
Who, besides the biggest idiot, is going to buy what you're saying? You didn't "stay out of it" at all. You popped in for the sole purpose of defending Simon Belmont's post. You showed zero interest or sympathy for the sentiments in the thread apart from trying to score a point and trying to defend your "protege" Simon Belmont.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
Doctor Scratch wrote:Because the person you blabbed to told me so in chat. Are you denying that you went and did that, Ray?
Poor you, Scratch. King of accusation and innuendo. Forgive me Father, for I have sinned against Scratch. As you sow, you shall reap in the whirlwind.
Come on, Ray.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
What is your real name? Who are you? Put your real name to your posts here, and then I'll take you seriously. If you don't have the intestinal fortitude to do this - then don't try to appease me.