Just wait long enough, and the truth pokes its head up...

[Guest]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/06 ... to-enrich/


It's only a matter of time until the curtain is pulled back on the rest of them as well. The climate cabal of which Hansen was a pivotal part will eventually unravel for all to see.

All in good time.

[_Buffalo]

It's all twoo! Science is fake!

[_Quasimodo]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/06/22/nasa-scientist-accused-using-celeb-status-among-environmental-groups-to-enrich/


It's only a matter of time until the curtain is pulled back on the rest of them, as well. The climate cabal of which Hansen was a pivotal part will eventually unravel for all to see.

All in good time.

I give Fox News the same credulity that I give The National Enquirer. Maybe a little less (The National Enquirer doesn't really have an ax to grind).

If a pipe broke in your house and it was filling with water, would you just say that God knows what he is doing? Or would you call a plummer?

[_Valorius]

I would call my home teachers.
If I really needed a plumber, God would tell them,
and they could get me one.

You have to do things in order, Quasimodo.

[_Quasimodo]

I would call my home teachers.
If I really needed a plumber, God would tell them,
and they could get me one.

You have to do things in order, Quasimodo.

Very funny, Valorius!

If you were lucky, one of your home teachers would be a plummer.

I have visions of you (mask, hat and all) and the home teachers, sitting on the couch, with water up to your ankles, politely not mentioning the disaster.

[_Droopy]

It's all twoo! Science is fake!

We've known for a very long time now that their science was fake, and that the entire edifice of CAGW was built on the circumvention of empirical science for political ends.

The scope and audacity of the fraud is truly breathtaking to contemplate, and the corruption of the scientific community in allied climate related disciplines has been nothing short of outrageous in its brazen disdain for both science and the ethics that make good science possible.

[_Droopy]

I give Fox News the same credulity that I give The National Enquirer. Maybe a little less (The National Enquirer doesn't really have an ax to grind).

Its a balanced and both-sides-of-the-issue oriented alternative to the ideologically monochromatic mainstream media and its formatted, predigested view of every issue in which the script is written detailing the spin or interpretation of a story the reporter or media outlet will take before the details of the story are even known based on the story's ideological value in news creation, or in relation to a longstanding agenda pursuant to that issue.

If a pipe broke in your house and it was filling with water, would you just say that God knows what he is doing? Or would you call a plummer?

AGW is the fundamentalist secular left's mythical eschaton and its messiahs are Marx, Carson, and Ehrlich. More and more of the Left are trying to fool an ever less gullible public as time goes by, and the emperor is not only naked, but he's fallen off his horse.

[_asbestosman]

Just because some famous people in a movement are crooked does not render the whole movement crooked. Is Mormonism tarnished by George P. Lee? Are Christians everywhere to be held accountable for Peter Popoff's humbuggery?

Incidentally, I saw nothing in the article refuting the science of AGW. All I saw was that one man acted unethically with respect to his employment.

[_Droopy]

Just because some famous people in a movement are crooked does not render the whole movement crooked. Is Mormonism tarnished by George P. Lee? Are Christians everywhere to be held accountable for Peter Popoff's humbuggery?

Incidentally, I saw nothing in the article refuting the science of AGW. All I saw was that one man acted unethically with respect to his employment.

Mann, Hansen, Briffa, Jones, et al, as well as the ideologically motivated leadership of several major government science organizations (the NAS, Royal Society etc.) and the IPCC are the central core of a major scientific fraud of monumental historic proportions, similar to, but dwarfing the influence of Trofim Lysenko in the Soviet Union.

All the data manipulation, all the hiding of data and computer source code, all the curve fitting, all the corruption of the peer review process and manipulation editorial decisions at major scientific magazines and journals; all of the moral corruption of the scientific process by vast oceans of politically interested government grant money seeking scientific conclusions with policy implications, can be traced to the work of a rather small cabal of highly politicized/agenda or economically interested scientists, government agencies, political groups (the IPCC), and corporations for whom AGW means either power, money, or both.

For many on the Left, it is an aspect of their anti-human, militant neo-pantheistic religion. For others, it is a vehicle for the wrenching and thorough social transformation that could not be achieved by appeal to class war alone from within the framework of an older theory which has now been able to "hitchhike" upon the back of the Green movement.

There is no "science" behind AGW. The entire edifice has been falsified and/or rendered moot by actual empirical earth science. The only thing left for the cult of Climatism is the unvalidated and utterly unreliable computer models -where they began

[_Valorius]

Sometimes I wish there was a "like" button on forums, Droopy. I like your style, even though I don't follow everything you say. Thanks.