Rich's Website

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Morley
_Emeritus
Posts: 3542
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:19 pm

Re: Rich's Website

Post by _Morley »

Morley wrote:
Nothing defensive, Simon. I've talked about my history before, but in this thread it's just a deflection.

Back to the topic. Though the LDS Church takes no present official position on what constitutes the "Great and Abominable Church," several LDS leaders have specifically noted that it refers to Christianity or the Catholic Church. Personally, I don't have any problems with this. I do, however, think that it's an example of LDS leaders attacking another faith.


Reposting for a response from Simon. How is what LDS leaders have done any different from Rich's so-called attacks?
_Simon Belmont

Re: Rich's Website

Post by _Simon Belmont »

Morley wrote:Reposting for a response from Simon. How is what LDS leaders have done any different from Rich's so-called attacks?


I am not responsible for other people's opinions, actions, or words. I am responsible for mine, and Rich is responsible for his.

Yes, some past leaders have said some things which are negative towards other faiths, but on the whole, we have always been a people who love and include everyone.
_Morley
_Emeritus
Posts: 3542
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:19 pm

Re: Rich's Website

Post by _Morley »

Simon Belmont wrote:
Morley wrote:Reposting for a response from Simon. How is what LDS leaders have done any different from Rich's so-called attacks?


I am not responsible for other people's opinions, actions, or words. I am responsible for mine, and Rich is responsible for his.

Yes, some past leaders have said some things which are negative towards other faiths, but on the whole, we have always been a people who love and include everyone.


I can think of some very notable exceptions, but will let it go.

Thank you, Simon, for the response. Take care.
Last edited by Guest on Mon Jun 27, 2011 9:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Rich's Website

Post by _Buffalo »

Simon Belmont wrote:
Morley wrote:Reposting for a response from Simon. How is what LDS leaders have done any different from Rich's so-called attacks?


I am not responsible for other people's opinions, actions, or words. I am responsible for mine, and Rich is responsible for his.

Yes, some past leaders have said some things which are negative towards other faiths, but on the whole, we have always been a people who love and include everyone.


Um, no. That's a very recent development.

They used to have another character in the endowment - an evil minister who represented fallen religions (read: every religion but the COTPOTCOJCOLDS). :D
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_Valorius
_Emeritus
Posts: 92
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 9:17 pm

Re: Rich's Website

Post by _Valorius »

Simon Belmont wrote:
rich kelsey wrote:Claiming that I am completly ignorant about Mormonism is just one of the reasons I find no credibility in what that man says.


You have shown, time and again, that you know very little about my faith.
Great Caesar's Ghost, man! Can't you tell the difference between
"completely ignorant"
and
"know very little"?

Were you raised on a pig farm, to just throw words out like slop without paying any attention where they go or what they mean?
_Simon Belmont

Re: Rich's Website

Post by _Simon Belmont »

Valorius wrote:Great Caesar's Ghost, man! Can't you tell the difference between
"completely ignorant"
and
"know very little"?

Were you raised on a pig farm, to just throw words out like slop without paying any attention where they go or what they mean?


You can argue every nuance of my writing that you wish, if that makes you happy.

Attacking people and groups who are different than Rich makes him happy.

Defending people and faiths from people like Rich make me happy.

To each their own.
_thews
_Emeritus
Posts: 3053
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 2:26 pm

Re: Rich's Website

Post by _thews »

Simon Belmont wrote:You can argue every nuance of my writing that you wish, if that makes you happy.

Translation - You can point out where I'm being hypocritical and ignorant, but I won't listen and I'll continue to be a broken record and acknowledge nothing.

Simon Belmont wrote:Attacking people and groups who are different than Rich makes him happy.

Translation - I pretend to know what makes someone else happy to defend my ignorance of the truth.

Simon Belmont wrote:Defending people and faiths from people like Rich make me happy.

Translation - If I blatantly ignore intellectual honesty, someone who needs to feed their cognitive dissonance with distortion can potentially be kept from learning the truth.
2 Tim 4:3 For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine.
2 Tim 4:4 They will turn their ears away from the truth & turn aside to myths
_schreech
_Emeritus
Posts: 2470
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 3:49 pm

Re: Rich's Website

Post by _schreech »

Simon Belmont wrote:Attacking people and groups who are different than Rich makes him happy.

Defending people and faiths from people like Rich make me happy.


Lol - Its like you are not intelligent enough to grasp the hypocrisy of creating a thread to attack someone you disagree with for "attacking" people he disagrees with...You are quite the clown...

by the way - thanks for pointing out Rich's site as I didn't know it existed until you decided to publicly attack him and his faith...
"your reasoning that children should be experimented upon to justify a political agenda..is tantamount to the Nazi justification for experimenting on human beings."-SUBgenius on gay parents
"I've stated over and over again on this forum and fully accept that I'm a bigot..." - ldsfaqs
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: Rich's Website

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

Simon,

Your arguments on this thread have been terrible--completely devoid of nuance, substance, or evidence. It's shameful.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_schreech
_Emeritus
Posts: 2470
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 3:49 pm

Re: Rich's Website

Post by _schreech »

http://objectiveministries.org/shutdown/ - does this guy remind you of anybody? don't worry simon, you are not alone in your crusade to shut down anything/anyone that doesn't agree with your "beliefs"...
"your reasoning that children should be experimented upon to justify a political agenda..is tantamount to the Nazi justification for experimenting on human beings."-SUBgenius on gay parents
"I've stated over and over again on this forum and fully accept that I'm a bigot..." - ldsfaqs
Post Reply