The Liberal Lie on Prop 8

[_jskains]

Wouldn't stand anywhere close to you boy, would be too close to the stench.


So, go and bless some widows and orphans with your priesthood. launder and press your white shirts. Visit the Temple and renew your fairy tales. Do dead dunking and save on bathwater.

Such a great Mormon you are.

Yeah, and such a kind, respectful, and intelligent addition to the human race you appear to be.

JMS

[_Spurven Ten Sing]

As a trained historian, allow me to clarify something to the rubes like jskains.

Historians have developed methods to apply various theoretical approaches to the past. Each theory, or perspective, attempts to best explain all available evidence on a meta or micro scale. As a natural outgrowth of this, scholars have discovered that there existed many unexamined aspects of the human story. Gender, race, ethnicity, religion, economic identity, and sexual orientation are critical facets that must be addressed in constructing a theoretical framework.

It is not only expected, and valuable for analysis, it is demanded. Many a graduate student has had his thesis rejected and ripped apart for ignoring an aspect as fundamental as gender or sexual orientation. Every one of these must be addressed in any serious survey or monograph.

What's more, these expectations are decades old. That California wishes to include the relatively (30 years) new study of sexual identity in their curriculum is absolutely, positively in line with main stream academic approaches to history. In fact, it is laughable to leave it out.

So, Mr. Skains, you are speaking out of opaque, brittle, bigoted ignorance. You may wish to educate yourself and learn the difference between solid academic theory and "indoctrination". PC has nothing to do with it, moron.

[_jskains]

As a trained historian, allow me to clarify something to the rubes like jskains.

Start your argument with a childish insult. Check.

So, Mr. Skains, you are speaking out of opaque, brittle, bigoted ignorance. You may wish to educate yourself and learn the difference between solid academic theory and "indoctrination". PC has nothing to do with it, moron.

Finish your argument with a childish insult. Check.

Outstanding liberal citizen. You follow your leaders well.

JMS

[_Buffalo]

As a trained historian, allow me to clarify something to the rubes like jskains.

Start your argument with a childish insult. Check.

So, Mr. Skains, you are speaking out of opaque, brittle, bigoted ignorance. You may wish to educate yourself and learn the difference between solid academic theory and "indoctrination". PC has nothing to do with it, moron.

Finish your argument with a childish insult. Check.

Outstanding liberal citizen. You follow your leaders well.

JMS

Yes, it's too bad he included a few jabs. It gave you a way to weasel out of actually responding to his argument.

[_jskains]

Yes, it's too bad he included a few jabs. It gave you a way to weasel out of actually responding to his argument.

His argument is false. I do not need to know a man or woman's sexual preferences to know their contributions. Do you need to know who butt-screwed who or who liked oral or who liked to fondle goats or who liked to dress in candy underwear to know a person. It's the liberal community that is so hardcore about exposing the bedroom affairs of others. Conservatives generally think those are private matters not for public consumption.

by the way, do you want to tell us all your dirty little bedroom activities? I bet it gives me a better view of your "human" experience.

JMS

[_Morley]

Yes, it's too bad he included a few jabs. It gave you a way to weasel out of actually responding to his argument.

His argument is false. I do not need to know a man or woman's sexual preferences to know their contributions. Do you need to know who butt-screwed who or who liked oral or who liked to fondle goats or who liked to dress in candy underwear to know a person. It's the liberal community that is so hardcore about exposing the bedroom affairs of others. Conservatives generally think those are private matters not for public consumption.

by the way, do you want to tell us all your dirty little bedroom activities? I bet it gives me a better view of your "human" experience.

JMS

Emphasis mine.

How do you explain the Defense of Marriage Act?

[_jskains]

How do you explain the Defense of Marriage Act?

Marriage is a defined institution that did not need re-defining. It maintains that definition for a publicly sponsored institution.

JMS

[_Buffalo]

Yes, it's too bad he included a few jabs. It gave you a way to weasel out of actually responding to his argument.

His argument is false. I do not need to know a man or woman's sexual preferences to know their contributions. Do you need to know who butt-screwed who or who liked oral or who liked to fondle goats or who liked to dress in candy underwear to know a person. It's the liberal community that is so hardcore about exposing the bedroom affairs of others. Conservatives generally think those are private matters not for public consumption.

by the way, do you want to tell us all your dirty little bedroom activities? I bet it gives me a better view of your "human" experience.

JMS

Thank you for demonstrating why you are intellectually incapable of debating your way out of a paper bag.

Putting your gross bigotry on display was also helpful. Thanks.

[_schreech]

His argument is false. I do not need to know a man or woman's sexual preferences to know their contributions. Do you need to know who butt-screwed who or who liked oral or who liked to fondle goats or who liked to dress in candy underwear to know a person. It's the liberal community that is so hardcore about exposing the bedroom affairs of others. Conservatives generally think those are private matters not for public consumption.

by the way, do you want to tell us all your dirty little bedroom activities? I bet it gives me a better view of your "human" experience.

JMS

The fact that you can't separate homosexuality and "butt-screwing" really speaks volumes about how shallow and bigoted you really are...I also find your fear of the "liberal" boogeyman, running around "indoctrinating" your children hilarious...I guess I can see why it would be disturbing to you if your children grew up accepting people for who they are - might make you feel bad about being a small-minded homophobe...

[_Buffalo]

How do you explain the Defense of Marriage Act?

Marriage is a defined institution that did not need re-defining. It maintains that definition for a publicly sponsored institution.

JMS

Gay marriage was already legal before prop 8. Prop 8 re-defined marriage in order to exclude the hated minority.