My position on this has been pretty consistent, as long as I can remember. "Cult" is one of those words that doesn't add to a conversation. It's sort of a catch-all pejorative that usually means "a religion I don't agree with." You can't have a meaningful discussion with someone when you label them "deluded" or tell them they belong to a "cult."
jon wrote:I'm interested in finding out your opinion about how a cult exerts control over it's membership and how that differs from the Church (oJCoLDS)?
Think "Heaven's Gate." The guy had enough control to make a group of people commit suicide!
That's probably more along the lines of what a "cult" actually is.
Also, Golden Dawn, Argenteum Astrum, and Thelema, in my opinion, began as cults -- Thelema in Crowley's time, but I'm unsure about it now. I think it's officially recognized as a religion in the UK. I don't think Golden Dawn or A:.A:. are practiced anymore (could be wrong).
Simon Belmont wrote:Think "Heaven's Gate." The guy had enough control to make a group of people commit suicide!
That's probably more along the lines of what a "cult" actually is.
Also, Golden Dawn, Argenteum Astrum, and Thelema, in my opinion, began as cults -- Thelema in Crowley's time, but I'm unsure about it now. I think it's officially recognized as a religion in the UK. I don't think Golden Dawn or A:.A:. are practiced anymore (could be wrong).
Again, the designation of "cult" is just not helpful. A lot of people think the LDS church is a cult because Joseph Smith "had enough control to make a group of people" surrender their wives and property to him. People killed and were killed for Joseph Smith. Does that make the LDS church a cult?
Be careful what you label, because the label can just as easily be used against you.
jon wrote:I'm interested in finding out your opinion about how a cult exerts control over it's membership and how that differs from the Church (oJCoLDS)?
Think "Heaven's Gate." The guy had enough control to make a group of people commit suicide!
That's probably more along the lines of what a "cult" actually is.
Also, Golden Dawn, Argenteum Astrum, and Thelema, in my opinion, began as cults -- Thelema in Crowley's time, but I'm unsure about it now. I think it's officially recognized as a religion in the UK. I don't think Golden Dawn or A:.A:. are practiced anymore (could be wrong).
I tend to agree that there is a scale of 'control' along which organisations operate. The organisation gets more extreme and the mind control heavier as you move along the scale. At what point something becomes a 'cult' I don't know. I'm sure some very clever psychologists could model this and identify the point.
I think the Church will sit on the scale somewhere. Does the Church exert some control over it's members? Undoubtedly, through peer pressure or the behaviour/reward metric. Does this make it a 'cult'? In the academic sense, probably not.
I do think local leadership has a direct influence over where the local ward/branch sits on the control scale, more so than Church central. I also think Church central would like more control over ward operations than it currently has.
(not so stupid questions after all...)
'Church pictures are not always accurate' (The Nehor May 4th 2011)
Morality is doing what is right, regardless of what you are told. Religion is doing what you are told, regardless of what is right.
Runtu wrote:My position on this has been pretty consistent, as long as I can remember. "Cult" is one of those words that doesn't add to a conversation. It's sort of a catch-all pejorative that usually means "a religion I don't agree with." You can't have a meaningful discussion with someone when you label them "deluded" or tell them they belong to a "cult."
Again Runtu is the one to get it right. The word cult is almost always used to attack another group.