Mormon apologists are necessarily cranks

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Mormon apologists are necessarily cranks

Post by _Buffalo »

stemelbow wrote:
Buffalo wrote: Atheism is just about not believing. Period.


Ironically, and interestingly, what a dogmatic way of putting it, Buffalo. To be clear, atheism, at least as the word ws created, is meant to suggest "no god" and says nothing about not believing period.


What do you think is meant by "no god" stem?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_stemelbow
_Emeritus
Posts: 5872
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:40 pm

Re: Mormon apologists are necessarily cranks

Post by _stemelbow »

Buffalo wrote:What do you think is meant by "no god" stem?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism


Yepster. I'm not sure what you're looking for here, Buffalo. I agree with the link you provided.
Love ya tons,
Stem


I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Mormon apologists are necessarily cranks

Post by _Buffalo »

Stem, consider: anyone who has never been taught about the concept of god is by default an atheist. This would've course include babies.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_stemelbow
_Emeritus
Posts: 5872
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:40 pm

Re: Mormon apologists are necessarily cranks

Post by _stemelbow »

Buffalo wrote:Stem, consider: anyone who has never been taught about the concept of god is by default an atheist. This would've course include babies.


Interesting thought. So what if God showed Himself to a baby and thence the baby believes and is made a prophet? Move over Pres. Monson. Wait a second...what are we talking about here. I guess I don't see how this thought of yours is working. but to be clear I did agree with Jon that it was silly of me to say that atheism is the most dogmatic. I'm past that.
Love ya tons,
Stem


I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Mormon apologists are necessarily cranks

Post by _Buffalo »

stemelbow wrote:
Buffalo wrote:Stem, consider: anyone who has never been taught about the concept of god is by default an atheist. This would've course include babies.


Interesting thought. So what if God showed Himself to a baby and thence the baby believes and is made a prophet? Move over Pres. Monson. Wait a second...what are we talking about here. I guess I don't see how this thought of yours is working. but to be clear I did agree with Jon that it was silly of me to say that atheism is the most dogmatic. I'm past that.


Coolness.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_Nomad
_Emeritus
Posts: 504
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 7:07 pm

Re: Mormon apologists are necessarily cranks

Post by _Nomad »

Daniel Peterson wrote:
Buffalo wrote:Daniel, the question we all want to know is, do you want to believe?

Not particularly. I'm certainly open to the idea that certain participants on this board are space aliens, and that this is a photo of the craft on which they arrived, but I remain unconvinced, and I think other explanations for their behavior are intuitively more likely.

Whatever the explanation, it is always interesting to me how their behavior so much resembles schools of herring in the ocean, moving everywhere as one coordinated body. And whenever a new convert joins the ranks, he almost immediately becomes indistiguishable from all the others, reacting to the same stimuli in the same way, speaking the same common language, swimming blindly into the same net ...
... she said that she was ready to drive up to Salt Lake City and confront ... Church leaders ... while well armed. The idea was ... dropped ... [because] she didn't have a 12 gauge with her.
-DrW about his friends (Link)
_jon
_Emeritus
Posts: 1464
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:15 am

Re: Mormon apologists are necessarily cranks

Post by _jon »

Nomad wrote:Whatever the explanation, it is always interesting to me how their behavior so much resembles schools of herring in the ocean, moving everywhere as one coordinated body. And whenever a new convert joins the ranks, he almost immediately becomes indistiguishable from all the others, reacting to the same stimuli in the same way, speaking the same common language, swimming blindly into the same net ...


Nomad accurately describes Mormonism...
'Church pictures are not always accurate' (The Nehor May 4th 2011)

Morality is doing what is right, regardless of what you are told.
Religion is doing what you are told, regardless of what is right.
_Nomad
_Emeritus
Posts: 504
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 7:07 pm

Re: Mormon apologists are necessarily cranks

Post by _Nomad »

jon wrote:
Nomad wrote:Whatever the explanation, it is always interesting to me how their behavior so much resembles schools of herring in the ocean, moving everywhere as one coordinated body. And whenever a new convert joins the ranks, he almost immediately becomes indistiguishable from all the others, reacting to the same stimuli in the same way, speaking the same common language, swimming blindly into the same net ...


Nomad accurately describes Mormonism...

Right on cue.
... she said that she was ready to drive up to Salt Lake City and confront ... Church leaders ... while well armed. The idea was ... dropped ... [because] she didn't have a 12 gauge with her.
-DrW about his friends (Link)
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: Mormon apologists are necessarily cranks

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

jon wrote:
Nomad wrote:Whatever the explanation, it is always interesting to me how their behavior so much resembles schools of herring in the ocean, moving everywhere as one coordinated body. And whenever a new convert joins the ranks, he almost immediately becomes indistiguishable from all the others, reacting to the same stimuli in the same way, speaking the same common language, swimming blindly into the same net ...

Nomad accurately describes Mormonism...

Nearly three hundred statements from these allegedly indistinguishable Mormons -- mind-numbed, conformist, robotic automatons, all of them -- can be found here:

http://mormonscholarstestify.org/
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Mormon apologists are necessarily cranks

Post by _Buffalo »

Nomad wrote:Whatever the explanation, it is always interesting to me how their behavior so much resembles schools of herring in the ocean, moving everywhere as one coordinated body. And whenever a new convert joins the ranks, he almost immediately becomes indistiguishable from all the others, reacting to the same stimuli in the same way, speaking the same common language, swimming blindly into the same net ...


Image
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
Post Reply