Darwin Was A Panic Ridden Genius Who Lied

[_Nightlion]

Life on earth, in all its variety and abundance, and more especially in its locale proves animals must have been seeded upon the planet.

Australia could not have independently evolved. The odds of evolution happening once is impossible. Twice on the same planet?

The Amazon could not have independently evolved. The specialization of this region is so rich and diverse from all other locales on the planet that a rational mind could not conclude this is random selection compared with the scarceness of species everywhere else.

The Galapagos Islands' oddity proves that it was seeded and could never have evolved independent from the rest of the world.

I submit that all the variety on the planet proves it was seeded with life and that animals were placed upon the earth by a deliberate act of seeding by its creator.

It would further be obvious that the Amazon is a horticulture of God. Possibly an ongoing creation event right under our noses. Those who wanted God out of academia must have panicked when they began to realize the obviousness of the truth from all that exists upon the planet and freaked out in desperation to force a conclusion upon everyone at pain of exclusion.

[_zeezrom]

Where is this panic you mention?

[_Morley]

Life on earth, in all its variety and abundance, and more especially in its locale proves animals must have been seeded upon the planet.

Science doesn't claim that these locations 'independently evolved,' at least in the beginning. All land masses were united in one continent of Pangaea.

Image from Wikipedia entry on Pangaea.

[_Quasimodo]

Australia could not have independently evolved. The odds of evolution happening once is impossible. Twice on the same planet?

The evidence for evolution is overwhelming. It's not a rare or impossible occurrence. It's happening right now in every species in the world.

A simple example... dogs. All dogs are, in fact, still wolves to some degree. Any dog can mate with a wolf and produce fertile offspring (the definition of a species).

Dogs have been selectively bred to produce an amazing variety. Big, little, black, white, spotted. All are still wolves (I know it's hard to think of a miniature poodle as a wolf).

The genetic process that allows this selective breeding is the same one that powers evolution. It's the same for horses and cattle.

It's the same for the development of food grains such as corn. An ear of corn you buy from the store looks radically different from the natural corn it was developed from.

Human genetic manipulation (selective breeding) is only a speeding up of the evolutionary process.

If you want to be truly honest, Night, you will have to fit evolution into your philosophy somewhere.

[_Runtu]

Life on earth, in all its variety and abundance, and more especially in its locale proves animals must have been seeded upon the planet.

Australia could not have independently evolved. The odds of evolution happening once is impossible. Twice on the same planet?

The Amazon could not have independently evolved. The specialization of this region is so rich and diverse from all other locales on the planet that a rational mind could not conclude this is random selection compared with the scarceness of species everywhere else.

The Galapagos Islands' oddity proves that it was seeded and could never have evolved independent from the rest of the world.

I submit that all the variety on the planet proves it was seeded with life and that animals were placed upon the earth by a deliberate act of seeding by its creator.

It would further be obvious that the Amazon is a horticulture of God. Possibly an ongoing creation event right under our noses. Those who wanted God out of academia must have panicked when they began to realize the obviousness of the truth from all that exists upon the planet and freaked out in desperation to force a conclusion upon everyone at pain of exclusion.

Much as I like you, James, you do not know what you are talking about. The Galapagos are very strong evidence of evolution, as the species there evolved from mainland South American species and then further evolved on separate islands.

[_Tarski]

Life on earth, in all its variety and abundance, and more especially in its locale proves animals must have been seeded upon the planet.

Australia could not have independently evolved. The odds of evolution happening once is impossible. Twice on the same planet?

The Amazon could not have independently evolved. The specialization of this region is so rich and diverse from all other locales on the planet that a rational mind could not conclude this is random selection compared with the scarceness of species everywhere else.

The Galapagos Islands' oddity proves that it was seeded and could never have evolved independent from the rest of the world.

I submit that all the variety on the planet proves it was seeded with life and that animals were placed upon the earth by a deliberate act of seeding by its creator.

It would further be obvious that the Amazon is a horticulture of God. Possibly an ongoing creation event right under our noses. Those who wanted God out of academia must have panicked when they began to realize the obviousness of the truth from all that exists upon the planet and freaked out in desperation to force a conclusion upon everyone at pain of exclusion.

Here is where actually reading a book may have helped. You see, biogeographic data support Darwin very very strongly and was the part of his book that was considered most convincing. You know nothing! The divergences in species that separate Australia from those on nearby land masses occur at the same time as the land masses diverged and basically explains all sorts of things that would otherwise be mysterious.

Please read at least this much:
http://biology.clc.uc.edu/courses/bio303/contdrift.htm

[_moksha]

How many varieties of finches live on Apocalrock and how did they become differentiated for their various niches?

[_Dr. Shades]

Australia could not have independently evolved.

Nobody thinks it did.

The Amazon could not have independently evolved.

Nobody thinks it did.

The Galapagos Islands' oddity proves that it was seeded and could never have evolved independent from the rest of the world.

Nobody thinks it evolved independent from the rest of the world.

Those who wanted God out of academia must have panicked when they began to realize the obviousness of the truth from all that exists upon the planet and freaked out in desperation to force a conclusion upon everyone at pain of exclusion.

What does this "pain of exclusion" look and feel like?

[_Nightlion]

Where is this panic you mention?

The panic was the overwhelming evidence of creation that pinned the truth to the roof. The only way science could rid themselves of the Omnipresence Dynamic was to panic and rewrite an entire new script that ignores God.

Its kind of like the microcosmic dimension where MDD denies that I exist and my doctrine does not exist and my gifts do not exist and my testimony does not exist, and that I do not have a better answer for everything. That is the ONLY way they can continue valid. I panic them.

Science craves validity and by removing God their validity goes through the roof. So the value they receives betrays their motive for theocide.

[_Nightlion]

Life on earth, in all its variety and abundance, and more especially in its locale proves animals must have been seeded upon the planet.

Science doesn't claim that these locations 'independently evolved,' at least in the beginning. All land masses were united in one continent of Pangaea.

Image from Wikipedia entry on Pangaea.

With all the circumspection of the 'Scientific Method' you would think that all the world would pan evolution for having claims with nothing backing up the weight of conclusion against the amount of evidence.
But no one will temp that task.

TENURE TENURE MY SOUL FOR TENURE

If the earth did not locally evolve separate events the face of earth makes no sense. You cannot account for it. Course, no one will tempt that task.

I bet a dozen donuts that if you do the timeline Pangea and evolution fail to align. Well, not until they realize it and fix it by moving all the dates around.