Hoops wrote:Because I've given it several times.
I believe I saw you say once that a Christian is defined as one who is saved. Forgive me if I can't see that has helpful at all. Every single person will have to consult you to know saved status or something.
Any religion that teaches contrary to essential Christian doctrine is not a Christian religion. For me: Trinity (Deity of Christ within the Trinity), total depravity. It's one thing to believe these things yet not be able to adequately understand them. It is quite another to deny them, as Mormonism does.
K. So for you part of the definition of being a Christian is acceptance of the Trinity explanation, but not really acceptance because some people don't understand it so they are still Christian, well if they say they are, but Mormonism can't be Christian because it denies the Trinity explanation--at least in part? Is that right? Wowzers.
I would add
Ouch. There's more?
that the picture on Christ's atoning death still seems a bit muddled. Contrast that with RCC's position, but there really is no comparison. And, Mormon practice may not align terribly well with its doctrinal stance, which, at a minimum, should give one pause. At a maximum could be exclusionary.
Okay so added to the definition is that one must have an unmuddled view of the Christ's atoning death? And the standard of having an unmuddled view of Christ's atoning death is the RCC position?
Can you type this all up into one succinct statement or coherent paragraph? I'd be much obliged.