The Book of Happy faces

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: The Book of Happy faces

Post by _Buffalo »

stemelbow wrote:I'm a fool, no doubt, to wonder this out loud, but why is porn such a hot topic of conversation around here?

LDS and many others think porn is bad. So what?


Maybe it's because of the Mormon obsession with porn. Also, the Mormon idea that apostasy = secret porno addiction.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_stemelbow
_Emeritus
Posts: 5872
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:40 pm

Re: The Book of Happy faces

Post by _stemelbow »

Buffalo wrote:Maybe it's because of the Mormon obsession with porn.


call me ignorant on this topic but aren't porn obsessions something which is not religion specific? Some people may be obsessed with porn, again I admit ignorance of this, but where does that translate into "Mormon obsession with porn"?

Also, the Mormon idea that apostasy = secret porno addiction.


huh? Many posters here who have left the Chuch bring up porn often and in so doing downplay, it seems, the perhaps negatives of porn that the Church would probably espouse. I'm not familiar with any "Mormon idea that apostasy = secret porn addiction", but I can attest that the number of times porn is brought up here far outnumbers the amount of times i hear it in Church or from LDS folks in general relatively speaking.
Love ya tons,
Stem


I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
_Quasimodo
_Emeritus
Posts: 11784
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:11 am

Re: The Book of Happy faces

Post by _Quasimodo »

stemelbow wrote:huh? Many posters here who have left the Chuch bring up porn often and in so doing downplay, it seems, the perhaps negatives of porn that the Church would probably espouse. I'm not familiar with any "Mormon idea that apostasy = secret porn addiction", but I can attest that the number of times porn is brought up here far outnumbers the amount of times i hear it in Church or from LDS folks in general relatively speaking.


Hey,Stem,

What are the negatives of pornography? I can think of a few on the porn industry side.

Obviously, child pornography is a true evil and exploits the innocent. Adult pornography can also be exploitive and manipulative of the "actors" involved. I also understand that there is fair amount of organized crime involvement in porn production (never a good thing).

What is the down side for viewers of porn? A serious question.

Who's definition of pornography are we using? At the turn of the last century, a knee showing might have been considered pornographic. Any sort of cleavage would have prompted legal action.

Does the LDS Church have an official definition of pornography?
This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.

"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Re: The Book of Happy faces

Post by _Some Schmo »

stemelbow wrote:call me ignorant on this topic but aren't porn obsessions something which is not religion specific?

I'm pretty sure it's religion specific to the cult in Eyes Wide Shut at least.
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
_stemelbow
_Emeritus
Posts: 5872
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:40 pm

Re: The Book of Happy faces

Post by _stemelbow »

Quasimodo wrote:Hey,Stem,

What are the negatives of pornography? I can think of a few on the porn industry side.


I can only offer regurgitated ideas that I have gotten wind of from others. I really have no particular interest or training here.

Obviously, child pornography is a true evil and exploits the innocent. Adult pornography can also be exploitive and manipulative of the "actors" involved. I also understand that there is fair amount of organized crime involvement in porn production (never a good thing).


Alright.

What is the down side for viewers of porn? A serious question.


I honestly don't know this. As I said, I can only offer vague statements that I've heard from others and since I don't really know, I'd prefer to say I don't know.

Who's definition of pornography are we using? At the turn of the last century, a knee showing might have been considered pornographic. Any sort of cleavage would have prompted legal action.


I'm not the originator of this thread. I don't have any specific definition of pornography in my head, as per my participation in this thread.

Does the LDS Church have an official definition of pornography?


The Church very well could, but i don't know.
Love ya tons,
Stem


I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: The Book of Happy faces

Post by _Buffalo »

stemelbow wrote:
Buffalo wrote:Maybe it's because of the Mormon obsession with porn.


call me ignorant on this topic but aren't porn obsessions something which is not religion specific? Some people may be obsessed with porn, again I admit ignorance of this, but where does that translate into "Mormon obsession with porn"?

Also, the Mormon idea that apostasy = secret porno addiction.


huh? Many posters here who have left the Chuch bring up porn often and in so doing downplay, it seems, the perhaps negatives of porn that the Church would probably espouse. I'm not familiar with any "Mormon idea that apostasy = secret porn addiction", but I can attest that the number of times porn is brought up here far outnumbers the amount of times i hear it in Church or from LDS folks in general relatively speaking.


Zee's extended family accused him of having a secret pornography addiction when he came out as an unbeliever. It's pretty common.

I challenge you to find a special priesthood meeting (conference or otherwise) that doesn't harp on porno.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_karl61
_Emeritus
Posts: 2983
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 6:29 pm

Re: The Book of Happy faces

Post by _karl61 »

I think an issue is whether an addiction* to pornography is a problem or a symptom of a problem. If you watch the video that was linked on this board then you would see it as a problem, likely made my those who are not mental health professionals, who would likely say it is a symptom of deeper issues.

* I would say an addiction is where you are spending large amounts of money, time, or energy, on a certain activity, that you know could bring undesireable consequences, but you feel helpless and unable to stop when you are doing it.
I want to fly!
_Hoops
_Emeritus
Posts: 2863
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:11 am

Re: The Book of Happy faces

Post by _Hoops »

karl61 wrote:I think an issue is whether an addiction* to pornography is a problem or a symptom of a problem. If you watch the video that was linked on this board then you would see it as a problem, likely made my those who are not mental health professionals, who would likely say it is a symptom of deeper issues.

* I would say an addiction is where you are spending large amounts of money, time, or energy, on a certain activity, that you know could bring undesireable consequences, but you feel helpless and unable to stop when you are doing it.

that's YOUR definition. It is LDS authority that is making judgement on its members, so it THEIR definition that is operative here. Where can this be found so one can know if one has an addiction or not? But, this is the inevitable destination of the LDS brand of legalism.

Like many things LDS, there is no clear cut line so one knows where one stands. For all the faults of Protestant Christianity (and there are many), they at least have staked out ground that let's one know where they stand.
_stemelbow
_Emeritus
Posts: 5872
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:40 pm

Re: The Book of Happy faces

Post by _stemelbow »

Buffalo wrote:Zee's extended family accused him of having a secret pornography addiction when he came out as an unbeliever. It's pretty common.

I challenge you to find a special priesthood meeting (conference or otherwise) that doesn't harp on porno.


Well, what do you mean by "harp on porno"? In the way I'd categorize "harp on porno" I don't' thin kI've ever seen one church meeting that can be considered doing as much. Mentioning it? I think there are tons, perhaps the majority, of priesthood meetings that don't even mention the word or concept. I don't know for sure though, and I don't think I'm too concerned anyway. I don't think mentioning the word can be considered anything close to harping on it though. So, I think the ball is kind of in your court. If they all harp on it, then I'd like to see evidence that any has ever harped on it, first. Perhaps this will give me an idea what you mean by harping on it.
Love ya tons,
Stem


I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: The Book of Happy faces

Post by _Buffalo »

stemelbow wrote:
Buffalo wrote:Zee's extended family accused him of having a secret pornography addiction when he came out as an unbeliever. It's pretty common.

I challenge you to find a special priesthood meeting (conference or otherwise) that doesn't harp on porno.


Well, what do you mean by "harp on porno"? In the way I'd categorize "harp on porno" I don't' thin kI've ever seen one church meeting that can be considered doing as much. Mentioning it? I think there are tons, perhaps the majority, of priesthood meetings that don't even mention the word or concept. I don't know for sure though, and I don't think I'm too concerned anyway. I don't think mentioning the word can be considered anything close to harping on it though. So, I think the ball is kind of in your court. If they all harp on it, then I'd like to see evidence that any has ever harped on it, first. Perhaps this will give me an idea what you mean by harping on it.


By harp on porno I mean obsessively talk about what a menace it is. How evil it is. You know, like how preachers in the 20s might have harped on the menace of that "demon liquor."

I've never seen a special priesthood meeting (ie, General Conference, or Stake meetings) that didn't harp on porno.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
Post Reply