Shulem wrote:Bring back the smiles and I swear I'll abuse them.
And there you have it, folks. Now you see why they aren't coming back.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
And with that, y'all just failed the test. I was about to bring them back, but as a final test I wanted to see if this thread could play itself out without them being abused.
Apparently not.
FAIL.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
Dr. Shades wrote:And with that, y'all just failed the test. I was about to bring them back, but as a final test I wanted to see if this thread could play itself out without them being abused.
Apparently not.
FAIL.
That really doesn't work, Shades.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Jersey Girl wrote:That really doesn't work, Shades.
Of course it does.
Just because you fail a test doesn't mean the test is faulty.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
Just because you fail to comprehend an explanation doesn't mean there was anything inherently wrong with it.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"