just me wrote:Well, my other idea is that we have houses like in HP.
Hewlett-Packard builds houses now??
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
moksha wrote:I am pretty sure Homodoxy would be contrary to the Proclamation on the Family.
However, a good slogan for the Maxwell Institute would be:
Orthodoxia, Orthopraxia & Orthodontia
Homodoxy may be a good term for gay russian or greek orthodox church members.
The other terms may offend orthodox members if incorporated by the Mormons. What now? or just saying.
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world. Joseph Smith We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…” Joseph Smith
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world. Joseph Smith We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…” Joseph Smith
Buffalo wrote: The church counts anyone who attends semi-regularly as active. What now?
Then some of NOM are active members and they should be called active and stop trying to find a new identity to commiserate with others who believe themselves to be different too.
Nothing wrong in being active. What about somewhat active for NOM? That was the term in the 70's.
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world. Joseph Smith We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…” Joseph Smith
Buffalo wrote: The church counts anyone who attends semi-regularly as active. What now?
Then some of NOM are active members and they should be called active and stop trying to find a new identity to commiserate with others who believe themselves to be different too.
Nothing wrong in being active. What about somewhat active for NOM? That was the term in the 70's.
Because "active" says nothing about your beliefs. That was my point.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
Active believing=TBM Active nonbelieving=NOM Nonactive believing=Jack Mormon Nonactive nonbelieving=Ex-Mormon (or never-mo, of course)
These aren't all inclusive, because you can be semi-active and/or semi-believing. But the point is that there are more than one axis to consider with regard to one's relationship with and participation in the church, so Active/Nonactive doesn't cover it.