hatersinmyward wrote:What do you belive or worship Schreech?
? - who cares? arent you the homophobe who hates Mormonism and homosexuals? If not, I apologize - just trying to keep the screen-names straight....
hatersinmyward wrote:What do you belive or worship Schreech?
schreech wrote:Wow...so much substance...Yes, I agree that its embarrassing for you
Joseph Antley wrote:schreech wrote:Wow...so much substance...Yes, I agree that its embarrassing for you
You do understand that agreeing with something that you're pretending someone else said is an extremely immature debate tactic, right?
2 Peter 2
“But there were false prophets also among the people [of old], even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily [i.e., secretly] shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.
“And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of.” (2 Pet. 2:1–2.)
When we think of false prophets and false teachers, we tend to think of those who espouse an obviously false doctrine or presume to have authority to teach the true gospel of Christ according to their own interpretation. We often assume that such individuals are associated with small radical groups on the fringes of society. However, I reiterate: there are false prophets and false teachers who have or at least claim to have membership in the Church. There are those who, without authority, claim Church endorsement to their products and practices. Beware of such.
Of such President Joseph F. Smith warned when he spoke of the “proud and self-vaunting ones, who read by the lamps of their own conceit; who interpret by rules of their own contriving; who have become a law unto themselves, and so pose as the sole judges of their own doings”
False prophets and false teachers are those who arrogantly attempt to fashion new interpretations of the scriptures to demonstrate that these sacred texts should not be read as God’s words to His children but merely as the utterances of uninspired men, limited by their own prejudices and cultural biases. They argue, therefore, that the scriptures require new interpretation and that they are uniquely qualified to offer that interpretation.
...
However, in the Lord’s Church there is no such thing as a “loyal opposition.” One is either for the kingdom of God and stands in defense of God’s prophets and apostles, or one stands opposed. And as Lehi of old counseled his sons, so this counsel is true for us today:
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
Joseph Antley wrote:
You do understand that agreeing with something that you're pretending someone else said is an extremely immature debate tactic, right?
Kevin Graham wrote: That's pretty much what DCP and Hamblin have been doing for days now over at MAD.
Heil Mitchell!
floatingboy wrote:knock it off, screech. you originally mentioned it as a joke, or at least a half-joke ("yeah, i went there"), but when he calls you out on it, you suddenly feel like you have to defend your stance? you know there's no real comparison between the two...no more than you can make between Hitler and any strong-willed leader. but being strong-willed does not equate to aggressively taking over neighboring countries and viciously enslaving/killing millions of people. get real. but i know you know this already.
KimberlyAnn wrote:PS. Floatingboy, I don't know your musical tastes, but it stands to reason that you might like a little Floating Action: 50 Lashes; Don't Stop Loving Me Now. I found them via Dr. Dog.