Schryver from Kinderhook Bomb

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Droopy
_Emeritus
Posts: 9826
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:06 pm

Re: Schryver from Kinderhook Bomb

Post by _Droopy »

What we have here is a great example of how MsJack is liar. I’m sure she remembers very well that, in the thread where he is alleged to have called harmony the “c” word, the primary person Will was having a discussion with was Rollo Tomasi. Rollo replied to the post where Will allegedly used the word. Liz provided evidence that the post harmony deleted (that supposedly contained the offending word) was up on the board for over 7 hours—from 11:00am to 6:30pm that day. Rollo was the only one to quote Will’s post, and his reply he didn’t mention anything about Will having used such a word. Of course, everyone here knows perfectly well that, if Will had used that word, it would have been a VERY big deal to all the “righteous” people on this board, much more so that the pair of posts where he used the “bitch” word in describing harmony and beastie, which were both seized on and quoted multiple times over the course of months and even years to show what a bad person Will is. But somehow the sensitive people here let Will’s “c” word offense go unmentioned not just in the 7+ hours on the day he is supposed to have said, but then it went unmentioned on the board for 6 MONTHS until MsJack unveiled the accusation in her “Misogyny” thread.


And this is precisely and exactly why I dubbed it, "The Anita Hill Syndrome." It was all forgotten and ignored until the publication of Will's work by the NAMI was a real going concern. Then, suddenly, as if by Gandalfian magic, it reappeared, along with each and every bad word Will had ever used in describing a female critic of the Church whom he found particularly galling, very rare as they were against the background of his entire posting history.

He had also used certain ad hominem terms against males here, but this, for some reason, did not become part of the dogpile. Only attacks aimed at female posters were, for some reason, important. Terms like "bitch," of course (a female dog) are coarse, but hardly different than something like traditional terms such as "dog" or "cur" aimed at a male (and anyone familiar with Robert E. Howard will know that these were once, in English, solid terms of personal dislike).

Calling a woman a "bitch"or "whore," while certainly hard edged, are no indication of "misogyny." Misogyny is hatred of woman as a class, and is a psychological orientation. Hard words aimed at gender specific individuals is indicative, unless there is some other facts at hand, of nothing more than extreme dislike of a gendered person in which one uses derogatory, gender specific language.


Sorry I'm so late to this conversation. I just logged in and noted several PM's asking me to comment on the charge of Will calling harmony the "c" word. It's been over 6 months since the thread in question occurred, so my memory is pretty hazy. But I can honestly say that I do not recall ever seeing Will use the "c" word, in that thread or in any other. And given how repulsed I am by that word, I'm pretty sure I would remember if he had.


And yet, Jack is still beating away at the same drum, even though she herself never saw the offending term.

MsJack is a liar and a propagandist. She has tried to manipulate public opinion, either through lies or blatant misrepresentation. That is what propagandists do. But in this case the evidence was strongly against her lies, and there were many observers, in addition to a first-hand witness (Rollo) who outright denied that Will was guilty of the charges she was making.


Which, despite her smarmy pose of intellectual sophistication, belies the reality behind the Kabuki doll.

It's no wonder MsJack doesn't want to revisit that discussion. It really made her look bad, and I'm not surprised that DCP was not persuaded by the case she had to make. Even some of Will's harshest critics weren't convinced, and they had the courage to say so. And that wasn't the only lie in MsJack's thread. She also lied, using out of context quotes and other fabrications, to say taht Will had called women "whores" and "sluts", which he also never did, unless someone wants to stretch it by saying citing a scripture reference (which, if you look it up, contains in part the phrase "whore of all the earth") is the same as calling a woman a "whore" or a "slut".


Yes, this is all so old, and we all went over Jack's own links at that time. There were some inappropriate things, here and there, spread out over huge periods of time in which Will engaged in no such talk, not to mention a great deal of overwrought theatrical stretching of what he had said.

She's on some kind of strange crusade to discredit Will Schryver,


"Strange crusades to discredit" are the coin of the realm here. There's the crusade to discredit Will, Scratch's year in, year out frothing over Danial Peterson, Kevin's obsession with me, Wade, Gee and Will, and on and on and on.
Nothing is going to startle us more when we pass through the veil to the other side than to realize how well we know our Father [in Heaven] and how familiar his face is to us

- President Ezra Taft Benson


I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.

- Thomas Sowell
_Nomad
_Emeritus
Posts: 504
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 7:07 pm

Re: Schryver from Kinderhook Bomb

Post by _Nomad »

MsJack:
/snip redundant rehearsal of her old propaganda crapola/

It’s enough to know that your effort at character assassination failed in the long run. Truth is funny that way. Fight against it all you want, it eventually rises to the top.

Maybe with this experience under your belt, you’ll be more successful the next time. Although I seriously doubt it, since you won’t have your phony reputation as a fair dealer to fall back on anymore.
... she said that she was ready to drive up to Salt Lake City and confront ... Church leaders ... while well armed. The idea was ... dropped ... [because] she didn't have a 12 gauge with her.
-DrW about his friends (Link)
_Nomad
_Emeritus
Posts: 504
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 7:07 pm

Re: Schryver from Kinderhook Bomb

Post by _Nomad »

Droopy wrote:"Strange crusades to discredit" are the coin of the realm here.

QFT
... she said that she was ready to drive up to Salt Lake City and confront ... Church leaders ... while well armed. The idea was ... dropped ... [because] she didn't have a 12 gauge with her.
-DrW about his friends (Link)
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: Schryver from Kinderhook Bomb

Post by _EAllusion »

Will didn't just use sexist epithets. That'd be easier to ignore. Will habitually insulted female posters by going after their sexual attractiveness to him. He continually engaged in hoary gender stereotyping and the language of sexism because he knew it would upset the female posters.

Take this thread I brought up as an example recently.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=9756&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=105

In it, Will is busy arguing that natural selection is a tautology, among other ignorant things about evolutionary theory. The Dude, JSM, and myself are mainly the people replying. Beastie chimes in some posts as well. How does Will respond to her?
You’re in completely over your head here, baby. You don’t have a freaking clue what is even going on. You’re just here for what you believe is a circle-jerk pile on, with me as the target.

But if you’d like to attempt to disprove my assessment, feel free to restate, or even directly quote, those instances where anyone has demonstrated that "natural selection" (absent the influence of external forces, such as described above) amounts to anything more than "those who reproduce best are selected." I’m quite confident you cannot do it. The best you can hope for is to play cheerleader for someone else who might try. So grab your pompoms, beastlie baby, and cheer on your boys.

I am convinced that no single group of humans can be more wilfully blind and dogmatic than is the overwhelmingly majority of LDS apostates. Fortunately, catastrophic events, such as the one presumed to have deselected the dinosaurs, can forcibly bring reproduction to an end. That’s what will happen to apostates at the second coming. And, believe me, deselection will never have come more deserved.


That's sexist as all get out, and a dime a dozen post from his history. That's Will. It's not just him occasionally calling someone a b-word.
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: Schryver from Kinderhook Bomb

Post by _EAllusion »

It's good to know that if I called a black poster "boy" and told him to go pick up his welfare check while others speak, pointing out that I'm racist could be described as an unfair smear campaign against me. Because that's who the real victim is. DCP, it would seem, might helpfully point out that I seem like a nice guy in person (if I'm a Mormon anyway) and therefore what I say to people via 1's and 0's over fiber optics doesn't matter so much.
_Droopy
_Emeritus
Posts: 9826
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:06 pm

Re: Schryver from Kinderhook Bomb

Post by _Droopy »

EAllusion wrote:Will didn't just use sexist epithets. That'd be easier to ignore. Will habitually insulted female posters by going after their sexual attractiveness to him.


"Habitually?" You see, this is the problem, because there was no "habit." There were a core of isolated incidents, over a vast posting history of no such verbiage. Roll the dice again, and keep rolling Delusion. You may eventually hit the daily double.

He continually engaged in hoary gender stereotyping and the language of sexism because he knew it would upset the female posters.


"Continually?" Roll again. You're heading for Boardwalk and Park Place, and I've got hotels on both.

Take this thread I brought up as an example recently.

http://mormondiscussions.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=9756&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=105


In it, Will is busy arguing that natural selection is a tautology, among other ignorant things about evolutionary theory.


Of course its a tautology. Anyone with a speck of philosophical acumen could easily argue that point.

The Dude, JSM, and myself are mainly the people replying. Beastie chimes in some posts as well. How does Will respond to her?

You’re in completely over your head here, baby. You don’t have a freaking clue what is even going on. You’re just here for what you believe is a circle-jerk pile on, with me as the target.


1. The term "baby" would indeed be a pressing issue...for Cathrine MacKinnon or Naomi Wolf. For most of us, in this context, its simply a turning on its head of what is otherwise a term of endearment. I had a girlfriend once who called me "babe," and in the Army, Drill Sargents routinely called other male soldiers "sweetheart" when issuing dire warnings.

You're so far out to sea here, Delusion, that even Al Gore's floating polar bears couldn't get to you, even if on the verge of starvation.

2. "Circle Jerks" are the guys who sit around the stage as a stripper dances and put money in her garter. I've used that term myself here to describe the intellectual masturbation that goes on in this echo chamber between the in-group. It's an apt metaphor for this entire place.

The best you can hope for is to play cheerleader for someone else who might try. So grab your pompoms, beastlie baby, and cheer on your boys.


Again, for Gloria Steinem, this is a shocking attack by a member of the Patriarchy against a woman who, as a woman, represents all woman (radical feminism is a major branch of Cultural Marxism, amended for its specific issues orientation), but for intellectually normal, balanced human beings, its all it appears to be...a modest ad hominem, if gender specific joust.

I am convinced that no single group of humans can be more wilfully blind and dogmatic than is the overwhelmingly majority of LDS apostates. Fortunately, catastrophic events, such as the one presumed to have deselected the dinosaurs, can forcibly bring reproduction to an end. That’s what will happen to apostates at the second coming. And, believe me, deselection will never have come more deserved.


Delusion:
That's sexist as all get out


It is? I don't even see any gender specific language in the sentence. It appears to me to be, in point of fact, gender neutral. The Great and Terrible day is, indeed, as gender neutral as it gets.

Have you taken your temperature today, E?
Nothing is going to startle us more when we pass through the veil to the other side than to realize how well we know our Father [in Heaven] and how familiar his face is to us

- President Ezra Taft Benson


I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.

- Thomas Sowell
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: Schryver from Kinderhook Bomb

Post by _EAllusion »

Of course its a tautology. Anyone with a speck of philosophical acumen could easily argue that point.

Lol. E for effort.


Anyway, repeatedly calling a woman who has previously complained about sexist comments from you "baby" when saying she is in over her head is quite sexist. Will wrote that to needle her. Saying that the same woman would be better served to grab her pompoms and cheer on her boys is even more so. Changing her name to "beastlie" was also another example of how he likes to specifically take shots at the physical appearance of female posters, but that's a minor thing compared to his trying to make sexist jabs.

It's an unambiguously sexist post. And the reason I quoted it is because it's not sexist because of an epithet or two. But I get that you're a fan of him and willing to defend such behavior. That's cool. That's who you are. It's up to others to decide if that's the kind of attitude they endorse as well.

It is? I don't even see any gender specific language in the sentence

I didn't break down the post line by line like you did. My comment was in reference to the post. Droopy, baby, maybe you shouldn't worry your pretty little head about this.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Schryver from Kinderhook Bomb

Post by _Buffalo »

Nomad wrote:MsJack:
/snip redundant rehearsal of her old propaganda crapola/

It’s enough to know that your effort at character assassination failed in the long run. Truth is funny that way. Fight against it all you want, it eventually rises to the top.

Maybe with this experience under your belt, you’ll be more successful the next time. Although I seriously doubt it, since you won’t have your phony reputation as a fair dealer to fall back on anymore.


How did it fail, Will? Your name is still mud, isn't it?

I'm not sure how quoting you can be called character assassination, though.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_Will Schryver
_Emeritus
Posts: 438
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:12 pm

Re: Schryver from Kinderhook Bomb

Post by _Will Schryver »

I want to thank EADelusion for bringing to my recollection one of the greatest threads in which I have participated over the years here in the GSTP. In it, against the combined attack of virtually every single member of the "wise in their own eyes" GSTP Battalion of Lost Souls, and armed with the MaDeuce of Unassailable Logic and Irrefutable Argument, I single-handedly mowed down the entire GSTP horde as it attempted to storm the hill and pull down the banner of reason. 'Twas truly a thing of beauty.

Oh, to be sure, none of those vanquished during that battle will ever acknowledge (nor did they even recognize at the time) what really happened over the course of my participation in that thread, notwithstanding the utter and complete slaughter that took place and the stench of rotting arguments that remains on the hill to this day ... but I enthusiastically invite any truly objective passerby to check it out for themselves. For my own part, I will be saving off the entire thread to a folder where I am assembling my message board "greatest hits" for posterity.

My Favorite cogdis of the Mormons
I thought myself the wiser to have viewed the evidence left of such a great demise. I followed every step. But the only thing I ever learned before the journey's end was there was nothing there to learn, only something to forget.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Schryver from Kinderhook Bomb

Post by _Buffalo »

Will Schryver wrote:I want to thank EADelusion for bringing to my recollection one of the greatest threads in which I have participated over the years here in the GSTP. In it, against the combined attack of virtually every single member of the "wise in their own eyes" GSTP Battalion of Lost Souls, and armed with the MaDeuce of Unassailable Logic and Irrefutable Argument, I single-handedly mowed down the entire GSTP horde as it attempted to storm the hill and pull down the banner of reason. 'Twas truly a thing of beauty.

Oh, to be sure, none of those vanquished during that battle will ever acknowledge (nor did they even recognize at the time) what really happened over the course of my participation in that thread, notwithstanding the utter and complete slaughter that took place and the stench of rotting arguments that remains on the hill to this day ... but I enthusiastically invite any truly objective passerby to check it out for themselves. For my own part, I will be saving off the entire thread to a folder where I am assembling my message board "greatest hits" for posterity.

My Favorite cogdis of the Mormons


You know, Nomad, every time you refuse to apologize for your sins (and indeed, glory in them), Jesus sweats another drop of blood in Gethsemane.

Please, think before you post.

Image
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
Post Reply